Skip to main content

Variation in stalk rot resistance and physiological traits of sorghum genotypes in the field under high temperature

A Correction to this article was published on 11 August 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

Sorghum grown in semi-arid regions is often exposed to stresses during reproductive development, leading to decreased grain yield. In field studies using irrigation, here we (1) evaluated 45 sorghum genotypes in a randomized complete block design with three replications for 3 years for tolerance to high temperature (HT) and resistance to Fusarium stalk and charcoal rots, (2) identified traits conferring tolerance to HT and resistance to two stalk rot diseases, and (3) studied the relationship between Fusarium stalk and charcoal rots with HT. The fungi Fusarium thapsinum and Macrophomina phaseolina were injected into stalks during anthesis. Relative chlorophyll content, photosystem II quantum yield (Fv/Fm), leaf temperature, lesion length, and grain yield were measured. Year had a significant effect on plant height, chlorophyll, Fv/Fm, leaf temperature, lesion length, and seed yield. HT stress decreased chlorophyll and Fv/Fm. For inoculated plants, physiological traits were not related to lesion length or seed yield. However, the chlorophyll index had a significant, negative correlation with leaf temperature. Genotypes PI533946, IS23992, IS26749, SC35, and RTx7000 had the maximum Fv/Fm. Inoculated plants and controls differed significantly in lesion length and seed yield. Genotypes SC35, IS27912, IS19262, and PI576380 had resistance to both pathogens. Principal component analysis indicated that there was no relationship between chlorophyll, Fv/Fm, and leaf temperature with lesion length or seed yield.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Change history

  • 11 August 2020

    In the original publication of the article, figure 2 was repeated as figure 1. The correct figures are published in this correction.

References

  1. Assefa Y, Staggenborg SA, Prasad PVV (2010) Grain sorghum water requirement and responses to drought stress: a review. Crop Manag. https://doi.org/10.1094/CM-2010-1109-01-RV

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bandara AY, Weerasooriya DK, Tesso TT, Little CR (2019) Stalk rot resistant sorghum genotypes are resilient to pathogen-mediated photosystem II quantum yield retardation. Crop Prot 124:104852

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boyer JS (1982) Plant productivity and environment. Science 218:443–448

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Camejo D, Jiménez A, Alarcón JJ, Torres W, Gómez JM, Sevilla F (2006) Changes in photosynthetic parameters and antioxidant activities following heat-shock treatment in tomato plants. Funct Plant Biol 33:177–187

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Demmig-Adams B, William W, Adams I (2006) Photoprotection in an ecological context: the remarkable complexity of thermal energy dissipation. New Phytol 172:11–21

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Diourte M, Starr JL, Jeger MJ (1995) Charcoal rot (M. phaseolina) resistance and the effects of water stress on disease development in sorghum. Plant Pathol 44:196–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Djanaguiraman M, Prasad PVV, Boyle DL, Schapaugh WT (2011) High temperature stress and soybean leaves: leaf anatomy and photosynthesis. Crop Sci 51:2125–2131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dodd JL (1980) The photosynthetic stress translocation balance concept of sorghum stalk rots. In: Leslie JF (ed) Sorghum diseases, a world review; Proc international workshop on sorghum diseases, sponsored jointly by Texas A&M University (USA) and ICRISAT, Hyderabad, India. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, pp 300–305

  9. Hassan MH, Salam MA, Arsan MR (1996) Influence of certain factors on severity of stalk rot disease of grain sorghum in Upper Egypt. Aust J Agric Sci 27:179–189

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hundekar AR, Anahahosur KH (1994) Pathogenicity of fungi associated with sorghum stalk rot. Karnataka J Agric Sci 7:291–295

    Google Scholar 

  11. ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics) (1984) Sorghum root and stalk rots, a critical review. In: Proceedings of the consultative group discussion on research needs and strategies for control of sorghum root and stalk rot diseases, 27 Nov–2 Dec 1983, Bellagio, Patancheru, pp 20

  12. IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: mitigation. Contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 863

    Google Scholar 

  13. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2014) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Working Group II. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 1132

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Kakani VG, Reddy KR, Koti S, Wallace TP, Prasad PVV, Reddy VR, Zhao D (2005) Differences in in-vitro pollen germination and pollen tube growth of cotton cultivars in response to high temperature. Ann Bot 96:59–67

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kapanigowda MH, Perumal R, Djanaguiraman M, Aiken RM, Tesso T, Prasad PVV, Little C (2013) Genotyping variation in sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] exotic germplasm collections for drought and disease tolerance. SpringerPlus 2:650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Klittich CJR, Leslie JF, Nelson PE, Marasas WFO (1997) Fusarium thapsinum (Gibberella thapsina): a new species in section Liseola from sorghum. Mycologia 89:643–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li PM, Cheng LL, Gao HY, Jiang CD, Peng T (2009) Heterogeneous behavior of PSII in soybean (Glycine max) leaves with identical PSII photochemistry efficiency under different high temperature treatments. J Plant Physiol 166:1607–1615

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Moore KJ, Dixon PM (2015) Analysis of combined experiments revisited. Agron J 107:763–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Prasad PVV, Djanaguiraman M (2011) High night temperature decreases leaf photosynthesis and pollen function in grain sorghum. Funct Plant Biol 38:993–1003

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Prasad PVV, Boote KJ, Allen LH Jr (2006) Adverse high temperature effects on pollen viability, seed-set, seed yield and harvest index of grain-sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] are more severe at elevated carbon dioxide due to higher tissue temperatures. Agric For Meteorol 139:237–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Prasad PVV, Pisipati SR, Mutava RN, Tuinstra MR (2008) Sensitivity of grain sorghum to high temperature stress during reproductive development. Crop Sci 48:1911–1917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ristic Z, Bukovnik U, Prasad PVV (2007) Correlation between heat stability of thylakoid membranes and loss of chlorophyll in winter wheat under heat stress. Crop Sci 47:2067–2073

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rosenow DT, Clark LE (1995) Drought and lodging resistance for a quality sorghum crop. In: Proc 50th annu corn and sorghum industry res conf, Dec 6–7, 1995, American Seed Trade Association, Chicago, pp 82–97

  24. Schmidhuber J, Tubiello FN (2007) Global food security under climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:19703–19708

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Seetharama N, Sachan RC, Huda AKS, Gill KS, Rao RN, Bidinger FR, Reddy DM (1991) Effect of pattern and severity of moisture-deficit strew on stalk-rot incidence in sorghum. II. Effect of source/sink relationships. Field Crop Res 26:355–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sultan B, Guan K, Kouressy M, Biasutti M, Piani C, Hammer GL, McLean G, Lobell DB (2014) Robust features of future climate change impacts on sorghum yields in West Africa. Environ Res Lett 9:104006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tenkouano F, Miller R, Frederiksen RA, Rosenow DT (1993) Genetics of non-senescence and charcoal rot resistance in sorghum. Theor Appl Gen 85:644–648

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tesso T, Claflin LE, Tuinstra MR (2004) Estimation of combining ability for resistance to Fusarium stalk rot in grain sorghum. Crop Sci 44:1195–1199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tesso T, Claflin LE, Tuinstra MR (2005) Analysis of stalk rot resistance and genetic diversity among drought tolerant sorghum genotypes. Crop Sci 45:645–652

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tesso TT, Ochanda N, Little CR, Claflin L, Tuinstra MR (2010) Analysis of host plant resistance to multiple Fusarium species associated with stalk rot disease in sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. Field Crop Res 118:177–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tesso T, Perumal R, Little CR, Adeyanju A, Radwan GL, Prom LK, Magill CW (2012) Sorghum pathology and biotechnology—a fungal disease perspective: part II. Anthracnose, stalk rot, and downy mildew. Eur J Plant Sci Biotech 6:31–44

    Google Scholar 

  32. Todorov D, Karanov E, Smith AR, Hall MA (2003) Chlorophyllase activity and chlorophyll index in wild and mutant plants of Arabidopsis thaliana. Biol Plant 46:125–127

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Trimboli DS, Burgess LW (1983) Reproduction of Fusarium moniliforme basal stalk rot and root rot of grain sorghum in the greenhouse. Plant Dis 67:891–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Turner JA (2008) Tracking changes in the importance and distribution of diseases under climate change. In: Proceedings HGCA R&D conference: ARABLE cropping in a changing climate, pp 68–77

  35. Upadhyaya HD, Pundir RPS, Dwivedi SL, Gowda CLL, Reddy VG, Singh S (2009) Developing a minicore collection of sorghum for diversified utilization of germplasm. Crop Sci 49:1769–1780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wahid A, Gelani S, Ashraf M, Foolad MR (2007) Heat tolerance in plants: an overview. Environ Exp Bot 61:199–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. White TJ, Bruns TD, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal genes form phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfrand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds) PCR protocols. Academic Press, San Diego, California, pp 315–322

Download references

Acknowledgements

Isolate M-3790 of Fusarium thapsinum was obtained from diseased sorghum tissue obtained in Manhattan, Kansas and was provided by Dr. Christopher Little, Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Kansas. Isolate r144 of Macrophomina phaseolina was obtained from lodged sorghum plants in Saline County, Kansas and provided by Dr. Gary Odvody (Texas A&M Research and Extension Center, Corpus Christi, Texas. We thank the Kansas Grain Sorghum Commission for continuous funding support. This paper is Contribution No. 20-095-J from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station, Manhattan, KS.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ramasamy Perumal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving human and animal participants

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 26 kb)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 38 kb)

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Perumal, R., Tomar, S.S., Bandara, A. et al. Variation in stalk rot resistance and physiological traits of sorghum genotypes in the field under high temperature. J Gen Plant Pathol 86, 350–359 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10327-020-00940-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Sorghum
  • Charcoal rot
  • Fusarium stalk rot
  • Chlorophyll content
  • Drought
  • Leaf temperature