Skip to main content
Log in

Environmental factors affecting technical efficiency in Norwegian steep terrain logging crews: a stochastic frontier analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Forest Research

Abstract

This study presents the analysis of panel data on steep terrain logging productivity in Norway. Given the specification of a Cobb Douglas stochastic frontier production function in which the technical inefficiency is a function of six different environmental factors, it was found that only one (terrain hindrance) decreased the efficiency significantly. The estimated efficiencies for the sample crews ranged from 0.43 to 0.99. Because of the nature of the inefficiency factors, one way to improve the efficiency could be to train the crews for working on steep slopes. This would also improve the safety when exposing workers to these types of environmental hazards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aigner D, Lovell K, Schmidt P (1977) Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. J Econ 6:21–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baardsen S, Lien G, Størdal S (2009) Profit efficiency in timber supply: marginalization and other relevant influences. For Sci 55:524–532

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg S, Forshed N (1982) Terrängtypsschema för skogsarbete. Forskningsstift Skogsarbeten, Kista

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergseng E, Solberg B (2007) Evaluating Financing of Forestry in Europe (EFFE) Country Report-Norway. Institutt for Natur Forvaltning Universitet for Miljø og Biovitenskap, Ås

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavas J-P, Aliber M (1993) An analysis of economic efficiency in agriculture: a nonparametric approach. J Agric Resour Econ 18:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chumbler JR, Ricardo JM (2002) Utilization of logging capacity in the southern United States and Maine. PhD thesis, University of Georgia, Athens

  • Cobb CW, Douglas PH (1928) A theory of production. Am Econ Rev 18(1):139–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelli TJ (1995) Recent developments in frontier modelling and efficiency measurement. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 39:219–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelli TJ, Battese GE (1996) Identification of factors which influence the technical inefficiency of Indian farmers. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 40:103–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelli T J, Henningsen A (2013) Stochastic frontier analysis, Reference manual of Package ‘frontier’ Version 1.1-0. project’s R-Forge site. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/frontier/frontier.pdf

  • Core Team R (2012) R: foundation for statistical computing. Austria, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale Ø, Hagen K B, Stamm J (1993) Driftsøkonomi og arbeidsmiljø blant norske skogsmaskinentreprenører (Norwegian logging contractor’s economy and work environment). Skogforsk Report, 25/93: 43, Norwegian Institute for Forestry Research, Ås (in Norwegian)

  • Debreu G (1951) The coefficient of resource utilization. Econometrica 19:273–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodd K, McNeel JF (1996) Factors affecting productivity of newly established thinning operations. Int J For Eng 7(2):43–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell MJ (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J R Stat Soc A 120:253–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghaffariyan MR, Stampfer K, Sessions J (2009) Production equations for tower yarders in Austria. Int J For Eng 20(1):17–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes H, Visser R (2001) Productivity improvements through professional training in Appalachian cable logging operations. In: Schiess P, Krogstad F (eds) Proceedings of the International Mountain Logging and 11th Pacific Northwest Skyline Symposium. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington and International Union of Forestry Research Organizations, Seattle, pp 48–55

  • Howard AF, Coultish LE (1993) Production equations for tower yarding in Coastal British Columbia. J For Eng 4(2):19–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Huyler N K, LeDoux C B (1997) Cycle-time equation for the Koller K300 cable yarder operating on steep slopes in the Northeast. Research Paper NE-705, United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Northeastern Forest 13 Experiment Station, Newtown Square http://www.fs.fed.us/ne/newtown_square/publications/research_papers/pdfs/scanned/ne_rp705p.pdf

  • Koopmans TC (1951) Analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. Act Anal Prod Alloc 13:33–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar SC, Lovell CK (2003) Stochastic frontier analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson JY, Hylen G (2007) Statistikk over skogforhold og skogressurser i Norge registrert i perioden 2000–2004. Norsk Institutt for Skog og Landskap, Ås

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeusen W, van Den Broeck J (1977) Efficiency estimation from Cobb–Douglas production functions with composed error. Int Econ Rev 18:435–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls A, Bren L, Mumphreys N (2004) Harvester productivity and operator fatigue: working extended hours. Int J For Eng 15(2):57–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Ovaskainen H, Uusitalo J, Väätäinen K (2004) Characteristics and significance of a harvester operators’ working technique in thinnings. Int J For Eng 15(2):67–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Samset I (1990) Some observations on time and performance studies in forestry. Norsk Institutt for Skogforskning, Ås

    Google Scholar 

  • Shephard RW (1970) Theory of cost and production functions. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Slappendel C, Laird I, Kawachi I, Marshall S, Cryer C (1993) Factors affecting work-related injury among forestry workers: a review. J Saf Res 24:19–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistisk Sentral Byro-Statistics Norway (2012) Focus on forests. http://www.ssb.no/skog_en/. Accessed 16 Dec 2013

  • Vik T (1984) Impact of terrain on human effort in forest operations. In: Human resources in logging. Proceedings of a seminar, Rotorua, New Zealand, pp 150–155

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Scientific Engineer Morten Nitteberg and Researcher Jorn Lilleng for collecting the data, Dr. Olvar Bergland for his support with the statistical revision and, last but not least, Mr. Torbjørn Frivik for having made available teams and the equipment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanna Ottaviani Aalmo.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ottaviani Aalmo, G., Baardsen, S. Environmental factors affecting technical efficiency in Norwegian steep terrain logging crews: a stochastic frontier analysis. J For Res 20, 18–23 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10310-014-0466-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10310-014-0466-x

Keywords

Navigation