Abstract
This study presents the analysis of panel data on steep terrain logging productivity in Norway. Given the specification of a Cobb Douglas stochastic frontier production function in which the technical inefficiency is a function of six different environmental factors, it was found that only one (terrain hindrance) decreased the efficiency significantly. The estimated efficiencies for the sample crews ranged from 0.43 to 0.99. Because of the nature of the inefficiency factors, one way to improve the efficiency could be to train the crews for working on steep slopes. This would also improve the safety when exposing workers to these types of environmental hazards.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aigner D, Lovell K, Schmidt P (1977) Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. J Econ 6:21–37
Baardsen S, Lien G, Størdal S (2009) Profit efficiency in timber supply: marginalization and other relevant influences. For Sci 55:524–532
Berg S, Forshed N (1982) Terrängtypsschema för skogsarbete. Forskningsstift Skogsarbeten, Kista
Bergseng E, Solberg B (2007) Evaluating Financing of Forestry in Europe (EFFE) Country Report-Norway. Institutt for Natur Forvaltning Universitet for Miljø og Biovitenskap, Ås
Chavas J-P, Aliber M (1993) An analysis of economic efficiency in agriculture: a nonparametric approach. J Agric Resour Econ 18:1–16
Chumbler JR, Ricardo JM (2002) Utilization of logging capacity in the southern United States and Maine. PhD thesis, University of Georgia, Athens
Cobb CW, Douglas PH (1928) A theory of production. Am Econ Rev 18(1):139–165
Coelli TJ (1995) Recent developments in frontier modelling and efficiency measurement. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 39:219–245
Coelli TJ, Battese GE (1996) Identification of factors which influence the technical inefficiency of Indian farmers. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 40:103–128
Coelli T J, Henningsen A (2013) Stochastic frontier analysis, Reference manual of Package ‘frontier’ Version 1.1-0. project’s R-Forge site. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/frontier/frontier.pdf
Core Team R (2012) R: foundation for statistical computing. Austria, Vienna
Dale Ø, Hagen K B, Stamm J (1993) Driftsøkonomi og arbeidsmiljø blant norske skogsmaskinentreprenører (Norwegian logging contractor’s economy and work environment). Skogforsk Report, 25/93: 43, Norwegian Institute for Forestry Research, Ås (in Norwegian)
Debreu G (1951) The coefficient of resource utilization. Econometrica 19:273–292
Dodd K, McNeel JF (1996) Factors affecting productivity of newly established thinning operations. Int J For Eng 7(2):43–50
Farrell MJ (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J R Stat Soc A 120:253–290
Ghaffariyan MR, Stampfer K, Sessions J (2009) Production equations for tower yarders in Austria. Int J For Eng 20(1):17–21
Haynes H, Visser R (2001) Productivity improvements through professional training in Appalachian cable logging operations. In: Schiess P, Krogstad F (eds) Proceedings of the International Mountain Logging and 11th Pacific Northwest Skyline Symposium. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington and International Union of Forestry Research Organizations, Seattle, pp 48–55
Howard AF, Coultish LE (1993) Production equations for tower yarding in Coastal British Columbia. J For Eng 4(2):19–25
Huyler N K, LeDoux C B (1997) Cycle-time equation for the Koller K300 cable yarder operating on steep slopes in the Northeast. Research Paper NE-705, United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Northeastern Forest 13 Experiment Station, Newtown Square http://www.fs.fed.us/ne/newtown_square/publications/research_papers/pdfs/scanned/ne_rp705p.pdf
Koopmans TC (1951) Analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. Act Anal Prod Alloc 13:33–37
Kumbhakar SC, Lovell CK (2003) Stochastic frontier analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Larsson JY, Hylen G (2007) Statistikk over skogforhold og skogressurser i Norge registrert i perioden 2000–2004. Norsk Institutt for Skog og Landskap, Ås
Meeusen W, van Den Broeck J (1977) Efficiency estimation from Cobb–Douglas production functions with composed error. Int Econ Rev 18:435–444
Nicholls A, Bren L, Mumphreys N (2004) Harvester productivity and operator fatigue: working extended hours. Int J For Eng 15(2):57–65
Ovaskainen H, Uusitalo J, Väätäinen K (2004) Characteristics and significance of a harvester operators’ working technique in thinnings. Int J For Eng 15(2):67–77
Samset I (1990) Some observations on time and performance studies in forestry. Norsk Institutt for Skogforskning, Ås
Shephard RW (1970) Theory of cost and production functions. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Slappendel C, Laird I, Kawachi I, Marshall S, Cryer C (1993) Factors affecting work-related injury among forestry workers: a review. J Saf Res 24:19–32
Statistisk Sentral Byro-Statistics Norway (2012) Focus on forests. http://www.ssb.no/skog_en/. Accessed 16 Dec 2013
Vik T (1984) Impact of terrain on human effort in forest operations. In: Human resources in logging. Proceedings of a seminar, Rotorua, New Zealand, pp 150–155
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Scientific Engineer Morten Nitteberg and Researcher Jorn Lilleng for collecting the data, Dr. Olvar Bergland for his support with the statistical revision and, last but not least, Mr. Torbjørn Frivik for having made available teams and the equipment.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Ottaviani Aalmo, G., Baardsen, S. Environmental factors affecting technical efficiency in Norwegian steep terrain logging crews: a stochastic frontier analysis. J For Res 20, 18–23 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10310-014-0466-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10310-014-0466-x