Abstract
Intensive monitoring of multiple taxonomic groups is essential to understand ecosystem structure and function. In such studies, plant ecologists desire to monitor animal communities as efficiently as possible. We examined the efficiency of two trapping methods with different trap distances and total trapping areas for monitoring forest-floor rodent communities. We especially targeted two endemic, terrestrial, and semi-arboreal species dominating in forests throughout Japan. The long-distance (25 m) and the short-distance (10 m) methods assumed less than and more than one trap per female territory, respectively. Irrespective of species, capture efficiency tended to be higher in the long-distance than in the short-distance method. Recapture probabilities of two species were more similar in the short-distance than in the long-distance method in 2013. Observed densities for both species in the short-distance method were relatively similar to the estimated densities based on the long-distance method in 2011. In contrast, observed densities were lower than the estimated densities in the short-distance method in 2013. Observed densities of semi-arboreal species tended to be underestimated when only terrestrial traps were used. From these results, we propose that the short-distance method can efficiently estimate densities and community composition when researchers plan a small-effort study for a short time with a small area. In contrast, the long-distance method will allow researchers to estimate population densities robustly, when taking a large effort of a 3- to 4-day session with a large area. Our results also suggest that using both terrestrial and arboreal traps will improve the estimation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abe M, Honda A, Hoshizaki K, Miguchi H (2008) Advantage of early seedling emergence in Fagus crenata: importance of cotyledon stage for predator escape and pathogen avoidance. Ecol Res 23:681–688
Baxter R, Hansson L (2001) Bark consumption by small rodents in northern and southern hemispheres. Mamm Rev 31:47–59
Biodiversity Center of Japan, Ministry of the Environment (2012) Monitoring site 1000 projects. http://www.biodic.go.jp/moni1000/index.html (in Japanese)
Criddle S (1930) The prairie pocket gopher, Thomomys talpoides rufescens. J Mamm 11:265–280
Doi T, Iwamoto T (1982) Local distribution of two species of Apodemus in Kyushu. Res Pop Ecol 24:110–122
Dueser RD, Shugart HH Jr (1978) Microhabitats in a forest-floor small mammal fauna. Ecology 59:89–98
Dyer LA, Letourneau DK, Chavarria GV, Amoretti DS (2010) Herbivores on a dominant understory shrub increase local plant diversity in rain forest communities. Ecology 91:3707–3718
Efford M (2004) Density estimation in live-trapping studies. Oikos 106:598–610
Focardi S, Capizzi D, Monetti D (2000) Competition for acorns among wild boar (Sus scrofa) and small mammals in a Mediterranean woodland. J Zool 250:329–334
Fontaine JB, Kennedy PL (2012) Meta-analysis of avian and small-mammal response to fire severity and fire surrogate treatments in U.S. fire-prone forests. Ecol Appl 22:1547–1561
Gelman A, Rubin D (1992) Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Stat Sci 7:457–511
Hamilton WJ Jr (1941) The food of small forest mammals in eastern United States. J Mamm 22:250–263
Hobbie JE, Carpenter SR, Grimm NB, Gosz JR, Seastedt TR (2003) The US long term ecological research program. BioSci 53:21–32
Holloway G, Malcolm JR (2007) Nest trees used by northern and southern flying squirrels in central Ontario. J Mamm 88:226–233
Japan Long-Term Ecological Research Network (2012) About JaLTER. http://www.jalter.org/modules/about/
Lambert TD, Malcolm JR, Zimmerman BL (2005) Variation in small mammal species richness by trap height and trap type in southeastern Amazonia. J Mamm 86:982–990
Laurance WF (1994) Rainforest fragmentation and the structure of small mammal communities in tropical Queensland. Biol Conserv 69:23–32
Lincoln FC (1930) Calculating waterfowl abundance on the basis of banding returns. USDA Circ 118:1–4
Lunn DJ, Thomas A, Best N, Spiegelhalter D (2000) WinBUGS—a Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility. Stat Comp 10:325–337
Miyao T, Morozumi W, Morozumi M, Hanamura H, Sato N, Akahane H, Sakai A (1963) Small mammals on Mt Yatsugatake. I. Small mammals in the subalpine forest zone on Mt Yatsugatake. Zool Mag 72:133–138 (in Japanese with English summary)
Mizuki I, Takahashi A (2009) Secondary dispersal of Dioscorea japonica (Dioscoreaceae) bulbils by rodents. J For Res 14:95–100
Murakami O (1974) Growth and development of the Japanese wood mouse (Apodemus speciosus). I. The breeding season in the field. Jpn J Ecol 24:194–206 (in Japanese with English summary)
Nakata T, Saitoh T, Iwasa MA (2009) Apodemus speciosus, Apodemus argenteus. In: Ohdachi SD, Ishibashi Y, Iwasa MA, Saitoh T (eds) The wild mammals of Japan. Mammalogical Society of Japan, Kyoto, pp 169–173
O’Farrell MJ, Clark WA, Emmerson FH, Juarez SM, Kay FR, O’Farrell TM, Goodlett TY (1994) Use of a mesh live trap for small mammals: are results from Sherman live traps deceptive? J Mamm 75:692–699
Oka T (1992) Home range and mating system of two sympatric field mouse species, Apodemus speciosus and Apodemus argenteus. Ecol Res 7:163–169
Ostfeld RS, Canham CD (1993) Effects of meadow vole population density on tree seedling survival in old fields. Ecology 74:1792–1801
Pearson DE, Ruggiero LF (2003) Transect versus grid trapping arrangements for sampling small-mammal communities. Wildl Soc Bull 31:454–459
Petersen CGJ (1896) The yearly immigration of young plaice into the Limfjord from the German Sea. Rep Dan Biol Station 6:1–48
Sakamoto SH, Suzuki SN, Degawa Y, Koshimoto C, Suzuki RO (2012) Seasonal habitat partitioning between sympatric terrestrial and semi-arboreal Japanese wood mice, Apodemus speciosus and A. argenteus in spatially heterogeneous environment. Mamm Stud 37:261–272
R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org
Sekijima T (1997) Evaluation of vertical habitat use in Apodemus argenteus and A. speciosus, by the footprint recording method. Jpn J Ecol 47:151–158 (in Japanese with English abstract)
Sekijima T (2004) Does interspecific competition affect the vertical habitat segregation of Apodemus argenteus and Apodemus speciosus? Experimental evaluation by removal and food supplementation. Mamm Stud 29:97–104
Shimada T (2001) Hoarding behaviors of two wood mouse species: different preference for acorns of two Fagaceae species. Ecol Res 47:127–133
Soné K, Kohno A (1999) Acorn hoarding by the field mouse, Apodemus speciosus Temminck (Rodentia: Muridae). J For Res 4:167–175
Steele BB, Bayn RL Jr, Grant CV (1984) Environmental monitoring using populations of birds and small mammals: analyses of sampling effort. Biol Conserv 30:157–172
Sturtz S, Ligges U, Gelman A (2005) R2WinBUGS: a package for running WinBUGS from R. J Stat Soft 12:1–16
Sugadaira Montane Research Center, University of Tsukuba (2012) Outline. http://www.sugadaira.tsukuba.ac.jp/english/e_summary.html
Swanson ME, Franklin JF, Beschta RL, Crisafulli CM, DellaSala DA, Hutto RL, Lindenmayer DB, Swanson FJ (2011) The forgotten stage of forest succession: early-successional ecosystems on forest sites. Front Ecol Env 9:117–125
Takahashi A, Shimada T (2008) Selective consumption of acorns by the Japanese wood mouse according to tannin content: a behavioral countermeasure against plant secondary metabolites. Ecol Res 23:1033–1038
Tamura N, Hayashi F (2008) Geographic variation in walnut seed size correlates with hoarding behaviour of two rodent species. Ecol Res 23:607–614
US Long Term Ecological Research Network (2012) LTER Network History. http://www.lternet.edu/about/history.html
Vander Wall SB (1990) Food hoarding in animals. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Weihong J, Veitch CR, Craig JL (1999) An evaluation of the efficiency of rodent trapping methods: the effect of trap arrangement, cover type, and bait. NZ J Ecol 23:45–51
Weltzin JF, Archer S, Heitschmidt RK (1997) Small-mammal regulation of vegetation structure in a temperate savannah. Ecology 78:751–763
Wiener JG, Smith MH (1972) Relative efficiencies of four small mammal traps. J Mamm 53:868–873
Williams DF, Braun SE (1983) Comparison of pitfall and conventional traps for sampling small mammal populations. J Wildl Manag 47:841–845
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the Sugadaira Montane Research Center, University of Tsukuba, for permission to conduct research within the site. We also thank Takahiro Ogai, Shigekazu Tomizuka, Kouji Nagaoka, and Mariko Katsuyama for their research assistance and a member of SMRC for valuable advice on the field research. This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Challenging Exploratory Research from JSPS (Grant Numbers 24657018 to Shinsuke H. Sakamoto; 23650236 to Chihiro Koshimoto), and by grants from the University of Miyazaki (Support Program for Integrated Research Project for Human and Veterinary Medicine).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
S. H. Sakamoto, S. N. Suzuki, and R. O. Suzuki equally contributing authors.
About this article
Cite this article
Sakamoto, S.H., Suzuki, S.N., Koshimoto, C. et al. Trap distance affects the efficiency and robustness in monitoring the abundance and composition of forest-floor rodents. J For Res 20, 151–159 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10310-014-0447-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10310-014-0447-0