Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Application of a simple model to estimate the footprint of CO2/H2O emission from tall forest

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Forest Research

Abstract

The interpretation of eddy covariance flux measurements over inhomogeneous surfaces depends largely on the footprint over which the fluxes are captured. Based on the Schuepp’s footprint model, the Gaussian distribution was introduced to take into account the lateral dispersion, and a simple analytical model was proposed to determine the footprint of eddy flux measurements. The model was validated at an eddy flux site in a tall forest in Changbai Mountain, northeast China, and it was demonstrated to give more detailed descriptions of spatial representativeness for CO2/H2O flux measurements. The proposed model was evaluated against a relatively complicated analytical footprint model, the FSAM model, and the two models showed reasonable consistency. This study pointed out that the usually used 0.01 isopleth of source weight function for outer-limit boundaries of source area integration may cause systematic underestimation of footprint dimensions, and a 0.001 isopleth was suggested for scalar flux footprint analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  • Aubinet M, Chermanne B, Vandenhaute M, Longdoz B, Yernaux M, Laitat E (2001) Long term carbon dioxide exchange above a mixed forest in the Belgian Ardennes. Agric For Meteorol 108:293–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldocchi DD (1997) Flux footprints within and over forest canopies. Bound-Layer Meteorol 85:273–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldocchi DD, Falge E, Gu L, Olson R, Hollinger DY, Running SW, Anthoni P, Davis KJ, Evans R, Fuentes J, Goldstein A, Katul G, Law BE, Lee X, Malhi Y, Meyers TP, Munger JW, Oechel WC, Paw KT, Pilegaard UK, Schmid H, Valentini R, Verma S, Vesala T, Wilson KB, Wofsy SC (2001) FLUXNET: a new tool to study the temporal and spatial variability of ecosystem-scale carbon dioxide, water vapor, and energy flux densities. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 82:2415–2434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Businger JA (1986) Evaluation of the accuracy with which dry deposition can be measured with current micrometeorological technique. J Clim Appl Meteor 25:1100–1124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer A (1974) A review of flux-profile relationships. Bound-Layer Meteorol 7:363–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flesch TK (1996) The footprint for flux measurements, from backward Lagrangian stochastic models. Bound-Layer Meteorol 78:399–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foken T, Leclerc MY (2004) Methods and limitations invalidation of footprint models. Agric For Meteorol 127:223–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friend AD, Arneth A, Kiang NY, Lomas M, Ogee J, Rodenbeck C, Running SW, Santaren JD, Sitch S, Viovy N, Woodwards FI, Zaehle S (2007) FLUXNET and modelling the global carbon cycle. Glob Change Biol 13:610–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gash JHC (1986) A note on estimating the effect of a limited fetch on micrometeorological evaporation measurements. Bound-Layer Meteorol 35:409–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan DX, Wu JB, Zhao XS, Yu GR (2006) CO2 fluxes over an old, temperate mixed forest in northeastern China. Agric For Meteorol 137:138–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holwerda F, Burkard R, Eugster W, Scatena FN, Meesters AG, Bruijnzeel LA (2006) Estimating fog deposition at a Puerto Rican elfin cloud forest site: comparison of the water budget and eddy covariance methods. Hydrol Process 20:2669–2692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horst TW, Weil JC (1992) Footprint estimation for scalar flux measurements in the atmospheric surface layer. Bound-Layer Meteorol 59:279–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horst TW, Weil JC (1994) How far is far enough—the fetch requirements for micrometeorological measurement of surface fluxes. J Atmos Ocean Technol 11:1018–1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh CI, Katul GG, Schieldge J, Sigmon JT, Knoerr KR (1997) The Lagrangian stochastic model for fetch and latent heat flux estimation above uniform and non-uniform terrain. Water Resour Res 33:427–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klaassen W, Sogachev A (2006) Flux footprint simulation downwind of a forest edge. Bound-Layer Meteorol 121:459–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kljun N, Kormann R, Rotach M, Meixner FX (2003) Comparison of the Lagrangian footprint model LPDM-B with an analytical footprint model. Bound-Layer Meteorol 106:349–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kljun N, Calanca P, Rotach MW, Schmid HP (2004) A simple parameterisation for flux footprint predictions. Bound-Layer Meteorol 112(3):503–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kormann R, Meixner FX (2001) An analytic footprint model for non-neutral stratification. Bound-Layer Meteorol 99:207–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kustas WP, Anderson MC, French AN, Vickers D (2006) Using a remote sensing field experiment to investigate flux-footprint relations and flux sampling distributions for tower and aircraft-based observations. Adv Water Resour 29:355–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leclerc MY, Thurtell GW (1990) Footprint prediction of scalar fluxes using a Markovian analysis. Bound-Layer Meteorol 52:247–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd CR (1995) The effect of heterogeneous terrain on micrometeorological flux measurements: a case study from HAPEX-SAHEL. Agric For Meteorol 73:209–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy MT, Janssens IA, Yuste JC, Carrara A, Ceulemans R (2006) Footprint-adjusted net ecosystem CO2 exchange and carbon balance components of a temperate forest. Agric For Meteorol 139:344–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ono K, Miyata A, Yamada T (2008) Apparent downward CO2 flux observed with open-path eddy covariance over a non-vegetated surface. Theor Appl Climatol 92:195–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebmann C, Göckede M, Foken T, Aubinet M, Aurela M, Berbigier P, Bernhofer C, Buchmann N, Carrara A, Cescatti A, Ceulemans R, Clement R, Elbers AJ, Granier A, Grünwald T, Guyon D, Havránková K, Heinesch B, Knohl A, Laurila T, Longdoz B, Marcolla B, Markkanen T, Miglietta F, Moncrieff J, Montagnani L, Moors E, Nardino M, Ourcival JM, Rambal S, Rannik Ü, Rotenberg E, Sedlak P, Unterhuber G, Vesala T, Yakir D (2005) Quality analysis applied on eddy covariance measurements at complex forest sites using footprint modeling. Theor Appl Climatol 80:121–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid HP (1994) Source areas for scalars and scalar fluxes. Bound-Layer Meteorol 67:293–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid HP (1997) Experimental design for flux measurements: matching scales of observations and fluxes. Agric For Meteorol 87:179–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid HP (2002) Footprint modeling for vegetation atmosphere exchange studies: a review and perspective. Agric For Meteorol 113:159–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid HP, Oke TR (1988) Estimating the source area of a turbulent flux measurement over a patchy surface. Preprint in: the 8th symposium on turbulence and diffusion. Am Meteorol Soc, Boston, pp 123–126

  • Schuepp PH, Leclerc MY, MacPherson JI, Desjardins RL (1990) Footprint prediction of scalar fluxes from analytical solutions of the diffusion equation. Bound-Lay Meteorol 50:355–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sogachev A, Leclerc MY, Karipot A, Zhang G, Vesala T (2005a) Effect of clearcuts on footprints and flux measurements above a forest canopy. Agric For Meteorol 133:182–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sogachev A, Panferov O, Gravenhorst G, Vesala T (2005b) Numerical analysis of flux footprints for different landscapes. Theor Appl Climatol 80:169–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Ulden AP (1978) Simple estimates for vertical diffusion from sources near the ground. Atmos Environ 12:2125–2129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vourlitis GL, Oechel WC, Hope A, Stow D, Boynton B, Verfaillie J Jr, Zulueta R, Hastings SJ (2000) Physiological models for scaling plot-measurements of CO2 flux across an arctic tundra landscape. Ecol Appl 10:60–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Guan D, Wu J, Jin C, Han S (2004) Zero-plane displacement and roughness length of the mixed forest of broad-leaved and Korean-pine in Changbai Mountain. Chin J Ecol 23(5):84–88

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the State Key Laboratory of Forest and Soil Ecology (Grant No. LFSE2013-11) and the Frontier Project of Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences. The authors would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions to improve the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Forest and Soil Ecology, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wenhua Road 72#, Shenyang, 110016, China

    Jiabing Wu & Jia Zhai

  2. Ernst Moritz Arndt University of Greifswald, 17489, Greifswald, Germany

    Jiabing Wu & Jayenda Singh

  3. Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China

    Jia Zhai

Authors
  1. Jiabing Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jia Zhai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jayenda Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiabing Wu.

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, J., Zhai, J. & Singh, J. Application of a simple model to estimate the footprint of CO2/H2O emission from tall forest. J For Res 20, 222–229 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10310-014-0437-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10310-014-0437-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation