Journal of Forest Research

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 12–21 | Cite as

Contrasting the financial efficiency of agroforestry practices in buffer zone management of Madhupur National Park, Bangladesh

  • H. M. Tuihedur Rahman
  • Jiban Chandra Deb
  • Gordon M. Hickey
  • Imrul Kayes
Original Article
  • 398 Downloads

Abstract

This research contrasts the financial profitability of different agroforestry practices in community-based buffer zone management of Madhupur National Park (MNP), Bangladesh. This park is the second largest in Bangladesh and subjected to enormous anthropogenic pressure and land rights-related conflicts. This paper reports the different agroforestry practices of villagers in different modules of the buffer zone of MNP, identified by a participatory research approach. It then assesses the profitability of each module on the basis of cost–benefit analysis, net present value, internal rate of return, and annualized income. Results indicate three agroforestry systems were being practised in the buffer zone by the participants: agro-silviculture, agro-silvo-horticulture, and combined woodlot and agroforestry. Among these modules, agro-silvo-horticulture was the most profitable, followed by agro-silviculture then combined woodlot and agroforestry. We recognize that not all of the participants can practise intensive agroforestry; our results suggest that the community-based buffer zone management strategy for MNP would benefit from prioritizing agroforestry practices where possible. This will lead to more successful buffer zone management for the conservation of natural forests while supporting the development of local resource-dependent communities.

Keywords

Buffer zone management Community livelihoods Financial analysis Land-use strategy Protected area 

References

  1. Ajayi OC, Akinnifesi FK, Sileshi G, Kanjipite W (2009) Labour inputs and financial profitability of conventional and agroforestry-based soil fertility management practices in Zambia. Agrekon 48:276–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alam M, Furukawa Y, Harada K (2010) Agroforestry as a sustainable land use option in degraded tropical forests: a study from Bangladesh. Environ Dev Sustain 12:147–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashley R, Russell D, Swallow B (2006) The policy terrain in protected area landscapes: challenges for agroforestry in integrated landscape conservation. Biodivers Conserv 15:663–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bisong FE, Andrew-Essien EE, Animashaun AI, Utang PB (2009) Indigenous agroforestry initiatives for protected area management: a study of ‘support zone’ villages of the Cross River National Park, Nigeria. Eur J Sci Res 25:165–173Google Scholar
  5. Elevitch CR, Wilkinson KM (2000) Economics of farm forestry: financial evaluation for landowners. Agroforestry guides for pacific island #7, Sustainable Education Research and EducationGoogle Scholar
  6. Farooque M (1997) Law and custom on forest of Bangladesh: issues and remedies. Bangladesh Environmental Lawyers Association, DhakaGoogle Scholar
  7. Folke C (2004) Traditional knowledge in social–ecological systems. Ecol Soc 9(3):7Google Scholar
  8. Franzel S, Denning GL, Lillesø JPB, Mercado Jr AR (2004) Scaling up the impact of agroforestry: lessons from three sites in Africa and Asia. Agrofor Syst 61:329–344Google Scholar
  9. Garrity DP (2004) Agroforestry and the achievement of the millennium development goals. Agrofor Syst 61:5–17Google Scholar
  10. Heinen JT, Mehta JN (2000) Emerging issues in legal and procedural aspects in buffer zone management with case studies from Nepal. J Environ Dev 9:45–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoque AE, Nazrul-Islam AKM, Huq SMI (2008) Seasonal variability of edaphic features of Madhupur sal forest of Bangladesh. Ecoprint 15:7–14Google Scholar
  12. Khaleque Q, Gold MA (1993) Pineapple agroforestry: an indigenous system among the Garo community of Bangladesh. Soc Nat Resour Int J 6:71–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kumar BM (2006) Agroforestry: the new old paradigm for Asian food security. J Trop Agric 44:1–14Google Scholar
  14. Lai CK (1991) Design of agroforestry systems: some examples and lessons from Bangladesh. For Ecol Manag 45:193–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lynagh FM, Urich PB (2002) A critical review of buffer zone theory and practice: a Philippine case study. Soc Nat Resour 15:129–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Manandhar PK (1986) Plan of action of agroforestry programme in Community Forestry Project in 1986 (RR). ADB/FAO Project BDG/81/028, BograGoogle Scholar
  17. Martin CE, Chehebar C (2001) The national parks of Argentinian Patagonia—management policies for conservation, public use, rural settlements, and indigenous communities. J R Soc N Z 5:845–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mehta JN, Heinen JT (2001) Does community-based conservation shape favorable attitudes among locals? An empirical study from Nepal. Environ Manag 28:165–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Michon G, Mary F, Bompard J (1986) Multistoried agroforestry garden system in West Sumatra, Indonesia. Agrofor Syst 4:315–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Muhammed N, Koike M, Sajjaduzzaman M, Sophanarith K (2005) Reckoning social forestry in Bangladesh: policy and plan versus implementation. Forestry 78:373–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Muhammed N, Koikea M, Haquea F, Miah MD (2008) Quantitative assessment of people-oriented forestry in Bangladesh: a case study in the Tangail forest division. J Environ Manag 88:83–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Murniati GDP, Gintings AN (2001) The contribution of Agroforestry systems to reducing farmers’ dependence on the resources of adjacent national parks: a case study from Sumatra, Indonesia. Agrofor Syst 52:171–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Priess JA, Mimler M, Klein AM, Schwarze S, Tscharntkr T, Steffan-Dewenter I (2007) Linking deforestation scenario to pollination services and economic return in coffee agroforestry systems. Ecol Appl 17:407–417CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Rahman MM, Vacik H, Begum F, Nishad A, Islam KK (2007) Comparison of structural diversity of tree-crop associations in peripheral and buffer zones of Gachabari sal forest area, Bangladesh. J For Res 18:23–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rahman MM, Motiur MR, Guogang Z, Islam KS (2010) A review of the present threats to tropical moist deciduous Sal (Shorea robusta) forest ecosystem of central Bangladesh. Trop Conserv Sci 3:90–102Google Scholar
  26. Rashid M, Satter F (2006) Indigenous people’s land right: Bangladesh perspective. Presented in international conference on land, poverty, social justice and development. Institute of Social Studies, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  27. Salam MA, Noguchi T, Koike M (2005) Factors influencing the sustained participation of farmers in participatory forestry: a case study in central Sal forests in Bangladesh. J Environ Manag 74:43–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stræde S, Treue T (2006) Beyond buffer zone protection: a comparative study of park and buffer zone products’ importance to villagers living inside Royal Chitwan National Park and to villagers living in its buffer zone. J Environ Manag 78:251–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Forest Society and Springer Japan 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. M. Tuihedur Rahman
    • 1
  • Jiban Chandra Deb
    • 1
  • Gordon M. Hickey
    • 2
  • Imrul Kayes
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Forestry and Environmental ScienceShahjalal University of Science and TechnologySylhetBangladesh
  2. 2.Department of Natural Resource Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental SciencesMcGill UniversitySte-Anne-de-BellevueCanada

Personalised recommendations