Skip to main content
Log in

Biomass equations for four shrub species in subtropical China

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Forest Research

Abstract

Estimation of shrub biomass can provide more accurate estimates of forest biomass and carbon sequestration. We developed species-specific biomass regression models for four common shrub species, Chinese loropetal (Loropetalum chinense), white oak (Quercus fabri), chastetree (Vitex negundo var. cannabifolia), and Gardenia (Gardenia jasminoides), in southeast China. The objective of this study was to derive appropriate regression equations for estimation of shrub biomass. The results showed that the power model and the quadratic model are the most appropriate forms of equation. CA (canopy area, m2) as the sole independent variable was a good predictor of leaf biomass. D 2 H, where D is the basal diameter (cm) and H is the shrub height (cm), is a good predictor of branch and root biomass, except for V. negundo var. cannabifolia and the root biomass of L. chinense. For total biomass, D 2 is the best variable for estimation of L. chinense and G. jasminoides, and D 2 H is the best variable for estimation of Q. fabri and V. negundo var. cannabifolia. Although variables D 2, D 2 H, and H are the preferred predictors for biomass estimation, CV (canopy projected volume, m3) could be used alone to predict branch, root, and total biomass in shrub species with acceptable accuracy and precision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alaback PB (1986) Biomass regression equations for understory plants in coastal Alaska: effects of species and sampling design on estimates. Northwest Sci 60:90–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Araújo TM, Higuchi N, Carvalho JA Jr (1999) Comparison of formulae for biomass content determination in a tropical rain forest site in the state of Pará, Brazil. For Ecol Manag 117:43–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JK (1976) Estimation shrub biomass from basal stem diameters. Can J For Res 6:154–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown S (1997) Estimating biomass and biomass change of tropical forests: a primer. FAO forestry paper 134. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Buech RR, Rugg DJ (1989) Biomass relations of shrub components and their generality. For Ecol Manag 26:257–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clough BF, Scott K (1989) Allometric relationships for estimating above-ground biomass in six mangrove species. For Ecol Manag 27:117–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foroughbakhch R, Reyes G, Alvarado-Vázquez MA, Hernández-Piñero J, Rocha-Estrada A (2005) Use of quantitative methods to determine leaf biomass on 15 woody shrub species in northeastern Mexico. For Ecol Manag 216:359–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frandsen WH (1983) Modelling big sagebrush as a fuel. J Range Manag 36:596–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haase R, Haase P (1995) Above-ground biomass estimates for invasive trees and shrubs in the Pantanal of Mato Grosso, Brazil. For Ecol Manag 73:29–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern CB, Miller EA, Geyer MA (1996) Equations for predicting aboveground biomass of plant species in early successional forests of the western Cascade Range, Oregon. Northwest Sci 70:306–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Houghton RA (1991) Tropical deforestation and carbon dioxide. Clim Change 19:99–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lu JS, Lai L (2003) Biostatistics (in chinese). Higher Education Press, Beijing, pp 218

  • Marland G, Schlamadinger B, Leiby P (1997) Forest/biomass based mitigation strategies: does the timing of carbon reduction matter? Crit Rev Environ Sci Tech 27:213–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin WL, Sharik TL, Oderwald RG, Smith DW (1981) Equations for estimating above ground phytomass in the understory of Appalachian oak forests. School of Forestry and Wildlife Resources. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA

  • Montès N, Gauquelin T, Badri W, Bertaudière V, Zaoui EH (2000) A non-destructive method for estimating above-ground forest biomass in threatened woodlands. For Ecol Manag 130:37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray RB, Jacobson MQ (1982) An evaluation of dimension analysis for predicting shrub biomass. J Range Manag 35:451–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadezhdina N, Tatarinov F, Ceulemans R (2004) Leaf area and biomass of Rhododendron understory in a stand of Scots pine. For Ecol Manag 187:235–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Návar J, Nájera J, Jurado E (2002) Biomass estimation equation in the Tamaulipan thornscrub of north-eastern Mexico. J Arid Environ 52:167–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Návar J, Méndez E, Nájera A, Graciano J, Dale V, Parresol B (2004) Biomass equations for shrub species of Tamaulipan thornscrub of North-eastern Mexico. J Arid Environ 59:657–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohmann LF, Grigal DF, Rogers LL (1981) Estimating plant biomass for undergrowth species of northeastern Minnesota forest communities. General Technical Report NC-61. USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experimental Station, St. Paul, MN, USA, 10 pp

  • Paton D, Azocar P, Tovar J (1998) Growth and productivity in forage biomass in relation to the age assessed by dendrochronology in the evergreen shrub Cistus ladanifer (L.) using different regression models. J Arid Environ 38:221–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paton D, Nuñez J, Bao D, Muñoz A (2002) Forage biomass of 22 shrub species from Monfragüe Natural Park (SW Spain) assessed by log–log regression models. J Arid Environ 52:223–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peek JM (1970) Relation of canopy area and volume to production of three woody species. Ecology 51:1098–1101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sah JP, Ross MS, Koptur S, Snyder JR (2004) Estimating aboveground biomass of broadleaved woody plants in the understory of Florida Keys pine forests. For Ecol Manag 203:319–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satoo T, Madgewick HAI (1982) Forest biomass. Junk, The Hague, Boston, 152 pp

  • Schimel D, Mellillo J, Tian HK, McGuire AD, Kicklighter D, Kittel T, Rosenbloom N, Running S, Thornton P, Ojima D, Parton W, Kelly R, Sykes M, Neilson R, Rizzo B (2000) Contribution of increasing CO2 and climate to carbon storage by ecosystems in the United States. Science 287:2004–2006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith WB, Brand GJ (1983) Allometric biomass equations for 96 species of herb, shrubs and small trees. Research Note NC-299. USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experimental Station, St. Paul, MN, USA

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 3rd edn. Freeman WH, New York, 887 pp

  • Tietema T (1993) Biomass determination of fuelwood trees and bushes of Botswana, southern Africa. For Ecol Manag 60:257–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VEMAP Members (1995) Vegetation/ecosystem modeling and analysis project: comparing biogeography and biogeochemistry modes in a continental-scale study of terrestrial ecosystem responses to climate change and CO2 doubling. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 9:407–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vora RS (1988) Prediction biomass of five shrub species in Northeastern California. J Range Manag 41:83–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams RA, McCleanahen JR (1984) Biomass prediction equations for seedlings, sprouts, and saplings of ten central hardwood species. For Sci 30:523–527

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was sponsored by the Funding of International Cooperative Projects no. 2006DFB91920, Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology, the Funding of Chinese Ecological Research Network, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and the National Key Basic Research Special Foundation of China (no. 2002CB4125). We would like to thank the staff of QYZ station for their assistance during the investigation. Thanks go to Hai-Qing Zhang, Xuan-Ran Li, Zhe Cai, and Zhen-Ying Zeng who assisted with harvesting and data processing. Their cooperation is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qi-Jing Liu.

About this article

Cite this article

Zeng, HQ., Liu, QJ., Feng, ZW. et al. Biomass equations for four shrub species in subtropical China. J For Res 15, 83–90 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10310-009-0150-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10310-009-0150-8

Keywords

Navigation