Skip to main content
Log in

A blended learning approach for clinical epileptology

Implementing an inverted classroom concept into the epileptology portion of the practical course on neurology for medical students. English Version

Ein Blended-Learning-Ansatz für die klinische Epileptologie

Implementierung eines Inverted-Classroom-Konzepts für den epileptologischen Teil der Ausbildung im Fach Neurologie für Medizinstudierende. Englische Version

  • Übersichten
  • Published:
Clinical Epileptology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The skills necessary for recognizing episodic disorders with transient symptoms, such as epileptic seizures, can be difficult to teach in clinical education; however, specialized recording methods, such as video electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring, document a wide range of transient episodes that can be used for teaching in medical studies.

Objective

We developed and designed a digital course according to the Inverted Classroom Model (ICM) which supported the students’ training regarding epileptic seizures during their practical course on neurology. This digital course was intended to provide instructions on the fundamentals and terminology of clinical epileptology, as well as training in recognizing seizures using clinical videos.

Methods

Students were provided access to various interactive digital learning material and seizure videos in a digital self-learning module prior to the 2‑day face to face event. Satisfaction with the digital course was evaluated using a questionnaire. Additionally, the examination results were retrospectively compared between students who only attended the in-person event versus those who also completed the digital course.

Results and conclusion

Student feedback revealed a high level of satisfaction with the digital course and a participation rate of approximately 90%. The clinical teaching videos appear to be an especially effective means of conveying the semiology and analysis of epileptic seizures; however, the examination results between students with and without access to the digital course were not different, possibly due to the retrospective analysis and the lack of explicit examination questions related to the content of the digital learning platform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kerres M (2005) Gestaltungsorientierte Mediendidaktik und ihr Verhältnis zur Allgemeinen Didaktik. In: Stadtfeld P, Dieckmann B (eds) Allgemeine Didaktik im Wandel. Klinkhardt, Bad Heilbrunn, pp 214–234

    Google Scholar 

  2. Akçayır G, Akçayır M (2018) The flipped classroom: a review of its advantages and challenges. Comput Educ 126:334–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tolks D, Schäfer C, Raupach T, Kruse L, Sarikas A, Gerhardt-Szép S, Kllauer G, Lemos M, Fischer MR, Eichner B, Sostmann K, Hege I (2016) Eine Einführung in die Inverted/Flipped-Classroom-Methode in der Aus- und Weiterbildung in der Medizin und den Gesundheitsberufen. GMS J Med Educ 33(3):12–23

    Google Scholar 

  4. O’Flaherty J, Phillips C (2015) The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: a scoping review. Internet High Educ 25:85–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zheng R (2018) Factors influencing learners’ cognitive and affective processes in visual learning. In: Ursyn A (ed) Visual approaches to cognitive education with technology integration. IGI Global, Hershey, pp 216–232

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Keller JM (1987) Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. J Instr Dev 10(3):2–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mann HB, Whitney DR (1947) On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Ann Math Stat 18(1):50–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Deci EL, Ryan RM (1993) Die Selbstbestimmungstheorie der Motivation und ihre Bedeutung für die Pädagogik. Z Padagog 39:223–238

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dyrna J, Riedel J, Schulze-Achatz S (2018) Wann ist Lernen mit digitalen Medien (wirklich) selbstgesteuert? Ansätze zur Ermöglichung und Förderung von Selbststeuerung in technologieunterstützten Lernprozessen. In: Köhler T, Schoop E, Kahnwald N (eds) Gemeinschaften in neuen Medien. Forschung zu Wissensgemeinschaften in Wissenschaft, Wirtschaft, Bildung und öffentlicher Verwaltung. TUDpress, Dresden, pp 155–166

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Claß.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

S. Claß declares that she has no competing interests. Memberships and advisory activities of R. von Wrede: memberships: DGfE, DGKN; advisory or speaker activities: Angelini, Arvelle, Apocare, Bial, Desitin, Eisai, JAZZ pharmaceuticals, UCB Pharma. Memberships and advisory activities of T. Baumgartner: memberships: DGN, DGfE, DGKN; advisory or speaker activities: Eisai, UCB Pharma. Memberships and advisory activities of R. Surges: memberships: AES, DGN, DGfE, DHV, DGKN, AG Epilepsiechirurgie; advisory or speaker activities: Angelini, Arvelle, Bial, Desitin, Eisai, Janssen-Cilag GmbH, Livanova, Novartis, Precisis GmbH, UNEEG, UCB Pharma, Zogenix.

The Ethics Commission for Clinical Trials on Humans and Epidemiological Research with Personal Data of the Medical Faculty of the Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn has confirmed that there are no professional ethical or professional legal concerns to be raised for the project described here (reference number 082/23). The creation and integration of the digital learning tools were not planned as a prospective trial, but were part of the department’s implementation to support the clinical teaching. Thus, informed consent was not obtained from the students.

The supplement containing this article is not sponsored by industry.

Additional information

figure qr

Scan QR code & read article online

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Claß, S., von Wrede, R., Baumgartner, T. et al. A blended learning approach for clinical epileptology. Clin Epileptol 36 (Suppl 2), 109–114 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10309-023-00628-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10309-023-00628-7

Keywords

Navigation