Skip to main content
Log in

Retentionsraten bei kontrollierten Antiepileptika-Studien

Retention rates of antiepileptic drugs in controlled trials

  • ORIGINALARBEIT
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Epileptologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Efficacy of antiepileptic drugs is usually given in randomized, placebo-controlled trials as seizure-reduction rates and in rates of frequency of seizure-free patients. All side-effects have to be documented in these trials before new drugs come to the market. These data are not sufficient to give the potency of an antiepileptic drug in detail. Long-term retention rate gives us a better tool for measuring efficacy and side effects of patients on long-term antiepileptic drug treatment. In this meta analysis all papers from the Pubmed and Cochrane Library databanks, in which long-term retention rates of antiepileptic drugs were given as one of the key words, were analyzed. Controlled studies with long-term retention rates from at least six months were included.

Zusammenfassung

Die Beurteilung von antiepileptischer Medikation erfolgt in den randomisierten, Placebo-kontrollierten Zulassungsstudien meist in Form von Anfallsreduktionsquoten, zusätzlich wird die Häufigkeit von anfallsfreien Patienten angegeben und alle berichteten unerwünschten Wirkungen. Wirksamkeit und Nebenwirksamkeit werden so erfasst, wenn auch unvollständig. Ein Maß, das verschiedene Aspekte der Potenz einer antiepileptischen Substanz ausdrücken kann, ist das der Langzeitretention, in das sowohl Verträglichkeit als auch Wirksamkeit, wie auch Aspekte von Lebensqualität mit eingehen. Anhand der Datenbanken Pubmed und der Cochrane Library wird eine Analyse aller der Arbeiten vorgenommen, die Langzeitretention bei Antiepileptika als Maß berücksichtigten. Dabei sollte die Beobachtungszeit mindestens 6 Monate betragen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  1. Arroyo Dodson DE, Privitera MD et al (2005) Randomized dose-controlled study of topiramate as firstline therapy in epilepsy. Acta Neurol Scand 112:214–222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Beghi E, Gatti E, Tonini C et al (2003) Adjunctive therapy versus alternative monotherapy in patients with partial epilepsy failing on a single drug: a multicentre, randomised, pragmatic controlled trial. Epilepsy Res 57(1):1–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bill PA, Vigonius U, Pohlmann H et al (1997) A double-blind controlled clinical trial of oxcarbazepin versus phenytoin in adults with previously untreated epilepsy. Epilepsy Res 27:195–204

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bootsma HP, Coolen F, Aldenkamp AP et al (2004) Topiramate in clinical practice: long-term experience in patients with refractory epilepsy referred to a tertiary epilepsy center. Epilepsy Behav 5:380–387

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brodie MJ, Chadwick DW, Anhut H et al (2002) Gabapentin versus lamotrigine monotherapy: a double-blind comparison in newly diagnosed epilepsy. Epilepsia 43:993–1000

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brodie MJ, Overstall PW, Giorgi L et al (1999) Multicenter, double-blind, randomised comparison between lamotrigine and carbamazepine in elderly patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. Epilepsy Res 37:81–87

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Brodie MJ, Richens A, Yuen AWC (1995) Double-blind comparison of lamotrigine and carbamazepine in newly diagnosed epilepsy. Lancet 345:476–479

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chadwick D, Anhut H, Greiner MJ et al (1998) A double-blind trial of gabapentin monotherapy for newly diagnosed partial seizures. Neurology 51:1282–1288

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Christe W, Kramer G, Vigonius U et al (1997) A double-blind controlled clinical trial: oxcarbazepine versus sodium valproate in adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy. Epilepsy Res 26:451–460

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cocito L, Mani M, Loeb C (1994) Long-term observations on the clinical use of lamotrigine as add-on drug in patients with epilepsy. Epilepsy Res 19:123–127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dam M, Ekberg R, Løyning Y, Waltimo O, Jakobsen K (1989) A doubleblind study comparing oxcarbazepine and carbamazepine in patients with newly diagnosed, previously untreated epilepsy. Epilepsy Res 3:70–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Depondt J, Yuen AW, Bell GS, Mitchel T, Koepp MJ, Duncan JS, Sander JW (2006) The long term retention of levetiracetam in a large cohort of patients with epilepsy. Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 77:101–103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Guerrero MM, Vigonius U, Pohlmann H et al (1997) A double-blind controlled clinical trial of oxcarbazepine versus phenytoin in children and adolescents with epilepsy. Epilepsy Res 27:205–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kluger G et al (2005) Retentionsraten neuer Antiepileptika bei Kindern. In: Aksu F (Hrsg) Aktuelle Neuropädiatrie. Novartis Verlag, pp 301–304

  15. Krakow K, Walker M, Otoul C, Sander JW (2001) Long-term continuation of levetiracetam in patients with refractory epilepsy. Neurology 56:1772–1774

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lhatoo SD, Wong IC, Polizzi G, Sander JW (2000) Long-term retention rates of lamotrigine, gabapentin, and topiramate in chronic epilepsy. Epilepsia 41:1592–1596

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lhatoo SD, Wong IC, Sander JW (2000) Prognostic factors affecting long-term retention of topiramate in patients with chronic epilepsy. Epilepsia 41:338–341

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Marson AG, Williamson PR, Clough H et al (2002) Carbamazepine versus valproate monotherapy for epilepsy: a meta-analysis. Epilepsia 43:505–513

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mattson RH, Cramer JA, Mc Cutchen B et al (1985) Comparison of carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin and primidone in partial and secondary generalized tonic-cloncic epileptic seizures. NEJM 313:145–151

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mattson RH, Cramer JA, Collins JF (1992) A comparison of valproate with carbamazepine for the treatment of complex partial seizures and secondarily generalised tonic clonic seizures in adult. N Engl J Med 327:765–771

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Montenegro MA, Cendes F, Noronha AL et al (2001) Efficacy of Clobazam as Add-On Therapy in Patients with Refractory Partial Epilepsy. Epilepsia 42 (4):539–542

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Nicolson A, Appleton RE, Chadwick DW, Smith DF (2004) The relationship between treatment with valproate, lamotrigine, and topiramate and the prognosis of the idiopathic generalised epilepsies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 75:75–79

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Nieto-Barrera M, Brozmanova M, Capovilla G et al (2001) A comparison of monotherapy with lamotrigine or carbamazepine in patients with newly diagnosed partial epilepsy. Epilepsy Res 46:145–155

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Privitera MD, Brodie MJ, Mattson RH et al (2003) Topiramate, carbamazepine and valproate monotherapy: double-blind comparison in newly diagnosed epilepsy. Acta Neurol Scand 107:165–175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rainesalo S, Peltola J, Auvinen A, Keanen T (2005) Retention rate of oxcarbazepine monotherapy in an unselected population of adult epileptics. Seizure 14(1):72–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Reunanen M, Dam M, Yuen AW (1996) A randomised open multicenter comparative trial of lamotrigine and carbamazepine as monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent epilepsy. Epilepsy Res 23:149–155

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Rowan AR, Ramsyay AE Collin JF et al (1999) New onset geriatric epilepsy: A randomized study of gabapentin, lamotrigine, and carbamazepine. Neurology 64:1868 –1873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sander JW, Trevisol-Bittencourt PC, Hart YM, Patsalos PN, Shorvon SD (1990) The efficacy and long-term tolerability of lamotrigine in the treatment of severe epilepsy. Epilepsy Res 7:226–229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sivenius J, Ylinen A, Kalviainen R, Riekkinen PJ Sr (1994) Longterm study with gabapentin in patients with drug-resistant epileptic seizures. Arch Neurol 51:1047–1050.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Steiner TJ, Dellaportas CI, Findley LJ et al (1999) Lamotrigine monotherapy in newly diagnosed untreated epilepsy: a double-blind comparison with phenytoin. Epilepsia 40:601–607

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Taylor S, Tudur Smith C, Williamson PR, Marson AG (2001) Phenobarbitone versus phenytoin monotherapy for partial onset seizures and generalized onset tonic-clonic seizures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD002217

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tudur Smith C, Marson AG, Clough HE, Williamson PR (2002) Carbamazepine versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD001911

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tudur Smith C, Marson AG, Williamson PR (2001) Phenytoin versus valproate monotherapy for partial onset seizures and generalized onset tonic-clonic seizures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD0017690

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Mayer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mayer, T. Retentionsraten bei kontrollierten Antiepileptika-Studien. Z. Epileptol. 21, 6–16 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10309-008-0292-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10309-008-0292-2

Key words

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation