Skip to main content
Log in

Resetting the energy-transition paths amid the dual crises: the EU-South Korean responses to the war in Ukraine and US-China rivalry

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Asia Europe Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Following the Paris Agreement, the European Union (EU) and South Korea became active in their pursuits of low-carbon energy solutions marked by substantial renewable energy growth and reforms in the mobility, power, and industrial sectors. Policy initiatives, such as the European Green Deal (2019) and Korean Green New Deal (2020), demonstrated their ambitious decarbonization commitments. However, their sustainable energy transitions have encountered two major challenges. First, the energy crisis due to the Russo-Ukrainian war accounts for the reduced supplies of Russian oil and gas, global price spikes, and a renewed focus on energy security; second, the US-China strategic competition exposed the over-reliance on China for the production of rare-earth materials that are essential for renewable energy technologies. The intersection of energy security and transition has emerged as a pivotal concern for both parties. In response, the EU introduced the “REPowerEU” plan to accelerate energy transition, whereas South Korea strategically expanded its nuclear power usage and recalibrated its energy mix. Both the EU and South Korea have augmented their investments in renewable energies while ensuring stable supplies of rare-earth materials and navigating new regulatory pressures from the USA. This study first represents a comparative survey of the energy-transition initiatives of both parties, including a comprehensive assessment of the European and Korean Green Deals and their measures for energy security. Further, the potential EU–Korea cooperation toward overcoming the energy crises, recognizing their shared values and opportunities to synergize bilateral- and multilateral-level energy transition, was explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The authors confirm that all data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article. All data and materials comply with field standards.

Notes

  1. The plan was finalized 2 months later, on May 18.

Abbreviations

BAU :

Business-as-usual

BBC :

British Broadcasting Corporation

BCM :

Billion cubic meters

CBAM :

Carbon border adjustment mechanism

CC :

Carbon capture

CCS :

Carbon capture and storage

CO2 :

Carbon dioxide

COP21 :

21st Conference of the Parties

COPs :

United Nations Climate Change Conferences

EC COM :

European Commission Communication

ERMA :

European Raw Materials Alliance

ETS :

Emission Trading System

EU :

European Union

EV :

Electric vehicle

EVs :

Electric vehicles

GHG :

Greenhouse gas

HEV :

Hybrid and electric vehicle

HEV-TCP :

Hybrid and electric vehicle collaboration programme

IEA :

International Energy Agency

IRA :

Inflation Reduction Act

KOSIS :

Korean Statistical Information Service

LNG :

Liquefied natural gas

U.S.:

United States

UNFCCC :

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

WEF :

World Economic Forum

References

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the KU-DIS Special Research Grant (2023).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Jae-Seung Lee-Corresponding author (Project planning, drafting, editing); Hayaan Lee-First author (Drafting, editing).

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jae-Seung Lee.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The authors confirm a compliance with ethical standards and no potential conflicting interest with the participants.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, H., Lee, JS. Resetting the energy-transition paths amid the dual crises: the EU-South Korean responses to the war in Ukraine and US-China rivalry. Asia Eur J 21, 607–623 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-023-00681-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-023-00681-x

Navigation