Abstract
In the context of globalization and internationalization, several common development trends and challenges have emerged in higher education systems around the world. These will have an impact on the individual university governance structures. Since the international university network gets an increasing importance and several university functions are shared within that network, it is crucial to take the international context into account when reshaping the university governance structure. Although several publications are dedicated to the countrywide or regional governance principles in the EU member states, it is often impossible to assimilate these global descriptions to the individual governance structure of a particular university. In this paper, we conduct case studies on five Chinese universities and five European universities from the perspective of governance structure, from four dimensions of the internal democratic nature, the external involvement, the level of centralization of decision-making authority, and the level of individual responsibility. This study analyzes the differences and commonalities between both. Chinese universities have a unified governance structure that is statutory based on the “President Responsibility System” in which the university’s party committee is officially designated to play the core role of leading the university. EU universities are more diversified in their governance principles, and each of them has its own unique features. To achieve better and deeper cooperation and collaboration between EU and Chinese universities, it is critical to understand and acknowledge these differences. Future research can add more dimensions and factors to broaden the scope of the analysis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Modern university: the term is used here for a university in which a multitude of missions are recognized within a fully developed third pillar of societal engagement and international embedding, next to education and research (Van den Akker et al. 2017). Modern universities engage across a broad transdisciplinary spectrum of activities with governments, funders, the private sector, civil society, and society at large in order to embrace a broad impact agenda (Wernli and Darbellay 2016).
UPC of the Communist Party of China (CPC) is a team composed of a secretary, deputy secretaries, and standing committee members. The president and some vice presidents are also members of the party committee. As a representative of the authority of CPC, the university party committee is officially recognized as the highest authority in universities.
In this article, the party secretary is referred to in Chinese pinyin by “Shuji.” The Shuji and Vice-Shuji are elected by the university’s party committee and need to be approved by the appropriate level of the CPC. The Shuji is sometimes directly appointed by the CPC and acts by consulting the university personnel on their opinion, often through voting.
References
ARWU (2020). Academic ranking of world universities since 2003. http://www.shanghairanking.com/index.html
Barnes J (2020) Collegial governance in postwar Australian universities. Hist Educ Rev. https://doi.org/10.1108/HER-12-2019-0050
Bennetot Pruvot E, Estermann T (2018) University governance: autonomy, structures and inclusiveness. Eur High Educ Area Impact Past Futur Policies 619–638. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77407-7_37
Bie D, Yi M (2014) The context of higher education development and policy response in China. Stud High Educ 39:1499–1510. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.949545
Boyko L, Jones G a (2010). The changing dynamics of higher education middle management. High Educ Dyn 33:83–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9163-5
Christensen T, Gornitzka A, Maassen P (2014). Global pressures and national cultures. Univ Adapt difficult Econ times 30–51
Côme T, Gueorguieva P, Gura R, Rouet G (2019) University governance in Europe: managerial convergences or political harmonization? J Intercult Manag 10:61–81. https://doi.org/10.2478/joim-2018-0017
Cornelis JPH (2019) “Research and innovation” as an integral part of strategic university governance: the case of VUB–A subtle power game in a complex academic ecosystem. In: University governance and academic leadership in the EU and China. IGI Global, pp 118–143
De Boer H, Enders J, Schimank U (2007) On the way towards new public management? The governance of university systems in England, the Netherlands, Austria, and Germany. New Forms Gov Res Organ Discip Approaches, Interfaces Integr 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5831-8_5
De Boer H, Stensaker B (2007) An internal representative system: the democratic vision. In: University dynamics and European integration. Springer, pp 99–118
Donina D, Hasanefendic S (2019) Higher education institutional governance reforms in the Netherlands, Portugal and Italy: a policy translation perspective addressing the homogeneous/heterogeneous dilemma. High Educ Q 73:29–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12183
EHEA (2020). European higher education area and Bologna process. www.EHEA.info
Fan H (2006) A comparative study on president tenure of research universities between China and USA [J]. In: Fudan Education Forum
Frølich N, Christensen T, Stensaker B (2019) Strengthening the strategic capacity of public universities: the role of internal governance models. Public Policy Adm 34:475–493. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076718762041
Gornitzka Å, Maassen P, de Boer H (2017) Change in university governance structures in continental Europe. High Educ Q 71:274–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12127
Hong M (2018) Public university governance in China and Australia: a comparative study. High Educ 76:717–733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0234-5
Hood C (1991) A public management for all seasons? Public Adm 69:3–19
Huang F (2018) University governance in China and Japan: major findings from national surveys. Int J Educ Dev 63:12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.05.006
Jian T, Yan C (2012) Selection of a university president: practice and thinking from the perspective of comparative research between US and China [J]. High Educ Dev Eval 2
Kretek PM, Dragšić Ž, Kehm BM (2013) Transformation of university governance: on the role of university board members. High Educ 65:39–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9580-x
Kwiek M (2015) The unfading power of collegiality? University governance in Poland in a European comparative and quantitative perspective. Int J Educ Dev 43:77–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.05.002
Lawn M (2011) Standardizing the European education policy space. Eur Educ Res J 10:259–272. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2011.10.2.259
Liu P, Wang X, Liang X (2019) Understanding university president leadership research in China: a review. Front Educ China 14:138–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-019-0006-8
Liu W, Yan W (2019) The internal governance model in Chinese universities: an international comparative analysis. J Appl Res High Educ 11:428–438. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-09-2018-0200
Liu X (2017) The governance in the development of public universities in China. J High Educ Policy Manag 39:266–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2017.1300122
Luo C, Wei C (2014) The difficulties and countermeasures of the principal responsibility system under the leadership of the party committee for the newly-founded undergraduate university. In: Higher Education Forum. p 4
Maassen P (2003) Shifts in governance arrangements. In: Amaral A, Meek VL, Larsen IM (eds) The higher education managerial revolution? Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0072-7_2
Mok KH (2005) Globalization and educational restructuring: university merging and changing governance in China. High Educ 50:57–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6347-z
Mok KH, Han X (2017) Higher education governance and policy in China: managing decentralization and transnationalism. Policy Soc 36:34–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1288964
Nokkala T (2007) Constructing the ideal university - the internationalisation of higher education in the competitive knowledhe society
Olsen JP (2007) The institutional dynamics of the European university. 25–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5971-1_2
Qian X, Verhoeven JC (2004) From centralization to decentralization in Chinese higher education. Educ Policy Anal Arch 12:67
QS (2020) Quacquarelli Symonds -world university ranking. https://www.topuniversities.com/qs-world-university-rankings/methodology
Saiti A, Abbott I, Middlewood D (2018) University governance: insights from England and Greece. Int J Educ Manag 32. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-05-2016-0091
Semela T (2017) Higher education expansion and the gender question in Ethiopia: a case study of women in a public university. Ethiop J High Educ 3:63–86
Shattock M (2017) University governance in flux. The impact of external and internal pressures on the distribution of authority within British universities: a synoptic view. High Educ Q 71 https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12132
Sporn B (2001) Building adaptive universities: emerging organisational forms based on experiences of European and US universities. Tert Educ Manag 7:121–134
THE (2020) Times higher education -world university rankings since 2004. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings
Van den Akker W, Spaapen J, Maes K (2017) Productive interactions: societal impact of academic research in the knowledge society. LERU position Pap
Wernli D, Darbellay F (2016) Interdisciplinarity and the 21st century research-intensive university. Leag Eur Res Univ
Westerheijden DF (2018) University governance in the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Japan: autonomy and shared governance after new public management reforms. Nagoya J High Educ 18:199–220
Zayim-Kurtay M, Zhu C (2019) Challenges of Chinese and European universities in the modernization and global context. Front Educ China 14:284–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-019-0014-8
Zhu C, Zayim-Kurtay M (2019) University governance and academic leadership in the EU and China. IGI Global
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.
Code availability
Not applicable.
Funding
This research was conducted in the framework of an EU project supported under the Erasmus+ Programme, and also funded by the China Scholarship Council.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xue, Y., Cornelis, J. & Zhu, C. EU-China university governance structures—case studies. Asia Eur J 20, 137–171 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-021-00637-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-021-00637-z