This study examines the level of application of Japanese-style management to the Czech Republic from the perspective of hybridization, by employing a survey of Japanese manufacturing firms based in this country. The survey reveals that the Japanese system of production control is strictly enforced, while work organization, labour relations and group consciousness have been—despite targeted practices used by Japanese companies to facilitate application of the Japanese system—largely adapted to the local conditions. Furthermore, this study identifies the transitional process from relying upon Japanese expatriates towards engaging local human resources in the parent-subsidiary relationship. In addition, even though the Japanese-style procurement method is applied with a large number of local suppliers, the local content ratio nevertheless remains relatively low in the Czech Republic. Overall, Japanese manufacturing firms, via their vigorous effort to transfer their distinctive management style, are challenging European business practices and Czech socio-cultural traditions, even though the level of hybridization is strongly variegated according to particular management spheres.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
The CzechInvest figure includes FDI from Japanese firms in Europe.
1 Euro = 25.3 CZK. http://www.xe.com/currencyconverter/convert/?Amount=1&From=EUR&To=CZK [accessed 27 January 2018].
Japanese FDI increased rapidly after the Plaza Accord in 1985 due to the appreciation of the yen.
Please note that there are only five assemblers in our survey. Thus, most data on the procurement method captured in Table 7b relate to first tier or second tier suppliers.
OECD Stat. https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=TUD# [accessed 25 January 2018]
Abegglen J (1958) The Japanese factory: aspects of its social organization. Free Press, New York
Abo T (1994) Hybrid factory: the Japanese production system in the United States. Oxford University Press, New York
Abo T (1998) Hybridization of the Japanese production system in North America, newly industrializing economies, South-East Asia, and Europe. In: Boyer et al (eds) Between imitation and innovation: the transfer and hybridization of production models in the international automotive industry. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 216–230
Abo T (2015) Researching international transfer of the Japanese-style management and production system: hybrid factories in six continents. Asian Bus Manag 14(1):5–35
Abo T, Kumon H, Juhn W (2013) The Japanese hybrid factories in Africa, 2009-2010: an interim report (in Japanese). Akamon Manag Rev 12(12):795–840
Boyer R (1998) Hybridization and model of production: geography, history, and theory. In: Boyer et al (eds) Between imitation and innovation: the transfer and hybridization of production models in the international automotive industry. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 23–55
Dore R (1973) British factory – Japanese factory: the origins of national diversity in industrial relations. University of California Press, Berkeley
Drahokoupil J (2009) Globalization and the state in Central and Eastern Europe: the politics of foreign direct investment. Routledge, London
Elger T, Smith C (1994) Global Japanization? The transnational transformation of the labour process. Routledge, London
Fukuda J (1988) Japanese-style management transferred: the experience of East Asia. Routledge, London
Gamble J (2010) Transferring organizational practices and the dynamics of hybridization: Japanese retail multinationals in China. J Manag Stud 47(4):705–732
Gill R, Wong A (1998) The cross-cultural transfer of management practice: the case of Japanese human resource management practices in Singapore. Int J Hum Resour Manag 9(1):116–135
Giroud A (2015) Abo’s ‘application-adaptation (hybrid) model’: a commentary. Asian Bus Manag 14(1):37–42
Gong Y (2003) Subsidiary staffing in multinational enterprises: agency, resources, and performance. Acad Manag 46(6):728–739
Imai M (1986) Kaizen: the key to Japan’s competitive success. McGraw-Hill, New York
Ishida H (1981) Human resources management in overseas Japanese firms. Jpn Econ Stud 10(1):53–81
Kenney M, Florida R (1993) Beyond mass production: the Japanese system and its transfer to the U.S. Oxford University Press, New York
Kumon H, Abo T (2004) The hybrid factory in Europe: the Japanese management and production system transferred. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke
Liker J, Fruin M, Adler P (1999) Remade in America: transplanting and transforming Japanese management systems. Oxford University Press, New York
Majek T, Hayter R (2008) Hybrid branch plants: Japanese lean production in Poland’s automobile industry. Econ Geogr 84(3):333–358
Ohno T (1988) Toyota production system: beyond large-scale production. Productivity Press, Portland
Olenjniczak T, Itohisa M (2017) Hybridization revised: new insights from the evolutionary approach. J Manag Bus Adm, Centr Eur 25(2):43–62
Oliver N, Wilkinson B (1988) The Japanization of British industry. Basil Blackwell, Oxford
Pavlínek P (2004) Regional development implications of foreign direct investment in Central Europe. Eur Urban Reg Stud 11(1):47–70
Pudelko M (2009) The end of Japanese-style management? Long Range Plan 42(4):439–462
Schlunze R (2002) Locational adjustment of Japanese management in Europe. Asian Bus Manag 1(2):267–283
Schonberger R (1982) The transfer of Japanese manufacturing management approaches to U.S. industry. Acad Manag Rev 7(3):479–487
Strange R, Kawai N (2015) The past, present and future of the hybrid factory: lessons from the study of the management of Japanese MNEs overseas. Asian Bus Manag 14(1):43–51
Takeuchi N (2009) How Japanese manufacturing firms align their human resource policies with business strategies: testing a contingency performance prediction in a Japanese context. Int J Hum Resour Manag 20(1):34–56
Tsurumi Y (1976) The Japanese are coming: a multinational interaction of firms and politics. Ballinger Publishing, Cambridge
Turnbull P (1986) The ‘Japanisation’ of production and industrial relations at Lucas. Ind Relat J 17(3):193–206
Womack J, Jones D, Roos D (1990) The machine that changed the world. In: Rawson Associates. Simon & Schuster, New York
World Economic Forum (2016) The global competitiveness report 2016–2017. World Economic Forum, Geneva
Yokozawa K, Steenhuis HJ & de Bruijn EJ (2012) Factors affecting international transfer of kaizen. Oper Supply Chain Manag 5(1): 1–13
Yoshino M (1976) Japan’s multinational enterprises. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
We should like to thank the Japanese Chamber of Commerce and Industry in the Czech Republic, JETRO Prague Office, all Japanese manufacturing firms in the Czech Republic (with special thanks to ACZ, Aisin, Daikin, TPCA, and TRCZ for the permission to use the corporate name) that supported our study, and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (KAKENHI Grant No. 15K03496) for research finance. We are also grateful to two anonymous referees for very helpful comments, although the usual disclaimer applies.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
|Point||18. Ratio of Japanese expatriates||21. Local content|
|5||4% or more||Less than 20%|
|4||3-less than 4%||20-less than 40%|
|3||2-less than 35%||40-less than 60%|
|2||1-less than 2%||60-less than 80%|
|1||less than 1%||More than 80%|
About this article
Cite this article
Natsuda, K., Sýkora, J. & Blažek, J. Transfer of Japanese-style management to the Czech Republic: the case of Japanese manufacturing firms. Asia Eur J 18, 75–97 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-019-00534-6
- M16 International Business Administration