Normative versus market power Europe? The EU-India trade agreement

Abstract

The normative power Europe concept has greatly enriched the academic debate on what the EU is (should be), what it does (should do) and what impact it has (should have). However, various theoretical, methodological and empirical issues remain insufficiently addressed. This article will address two issues that have mostly been neglected: the perspective of the norm takers (in line with this special issue) and the market norms of the EU. The first section elaborates on these two issues, relying on recent advances in the literature and specifically the contributions by Damro (J Eur Publ Pol 19(5):682–699, 2012) and Rosamond (Brit J Polit Int Relat 16(1):133–148, 2013). Against this background, the second section examines the controversial EU trade negotiations with India. Specifically, this empirical part section focuses on how market liberal norms (government procurement) and cosmopolitan norms (human rights) are being promoted and received. We conclude that in the eyes of the EU, trade agreements could be a means to mitigate partners’ opposition and an eventual stepping stone for successful off-take of international social standards and multilateral procurement liberalization regulations by its partner countries. But, partner countries might not necessarily espouse the EU’s interest-led motivation and lend support to the EU’s desire to effuse multilateral norms through trading agreements. The case study on EU-India trade talks illustrates this, highlighting the divergence between the EU and Indian perspectives and demonstrates India’s lack of enthusiasm to adopt the EU’s preferred model for liberalization.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    This is based on a close reading of Manners (re)formulations and the wider NPE debate (e.g. Manners 2000, 2006, 2008, 2011; Manners and Whitman 2003; Whitman 2013)

  2. 2.

    We would like to thank all the participants to the ‘Normative Power Europe?’ workshop at the University of Canterbury, in particular the editors of this special issue, as well as Fabienne Bossuyt, Lore Van den Putte and Hoang Hai Ha, for their feedback and suggestions on earlier versions.

  3. 3.

    See http://www.ilo.org/declaration/thedeclaration/lang--en/index.htm. India has not ratified the ILO conventions related to discrimination and child labour.

References

  1. Aggestam L (2008) Introduction: ethical power Europe? Int Aff 84(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bailey D, Bossuyt F (2013) The European Union as a conveniently-conflicted counter-hegemon through trade. J Contemp Eur Res 9(4):560–577

    Google Scholar 

  3. Björkdahl A, Chaban N, Leslie J, Masselot A (eds) (2015) Importing EU norms? conceptual framework and empirical findings. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  4. Börzel T, Risse T (2012) From Europeanisation to diffusion: introduction. West Eur Polit 35(1):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bossuyt F (2009) The social dimension of the new generation of EU free trade agreements with Asia and Latin America: ambitious continuation for the sake of policy coherence. Eur Foreign Aff Rev 14(5):703–742

    Google Scholar 

  6. Business Standard (2012) FTA with EU to benefit textile exports, 11 July. http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/ftaeu-soon-to-benefit-textile-exports/480043/. Accessed on 02 Sept 2014

  7. Chandler D (2003) Rhetoric without responsibility: The attraction of ‘ethical’ foreign policy. Brit J Polit Int Rel 5(3):295–316

  8. Campling L, Harrison J, Richardson B, Smith A (2014) Working beyond the border? a new research agenda for the evaluation of labour standards in EU trade agreements. A new research agenda for the Evaluation of labour standards in EU trade agreements (April 4, 2014). Warwick School of Law Research Paper, (2014/03)

  9. Cox R (1981) Social forces, states and world order: beyond international relations theory. J Int Stud 10(2):126–155

    Google Scholar 

  10. Damro C (2012) Market power Europe. J Eur Publ Pol 19(5):682–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Diez T (2005) Constructing the self and changing others: reconsidering ‘normative power Europe’. Millennium: J Int Stud 33(3):613–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Diez T (2013) Normative power as hegemony. Coop Confl 48(2):194–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Duchêne F (1973) The European community and the uncertainties of interdependence. In: Kohnstamm M, Hager W (eds) A nation writ large?foreign-policy problems before the european community. Macmillan, London, pp 1–21

    Google Scholar 

  14. European Parliament (2009) An EU-India FTA, Report no.: 2008/2135/INI (Brussels March 26). http://www.indianet.nl/pdf/ep090312.pdf. Accessed on 02 Sept 2014

  15. European Parliament (2011) Report on the EU as a global actor: its role in multilateral organisations, Committee on Foreign Affairs (rapporteur: María Muñiz de Urquiza), Report no: 2010/2298 (INI), Brussels, 29 April, paragraph 4

  16. European Commission (2006) Global Europe: Competing in the World. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2006/october/tradoc_130376.pdf. Accessed on 02 Sept 2014

  17. European Commission (2008) EU-India FTA Negotiations: EC Key Messages, January-February

  18. European Commission (2010) Report on progress achieved on the Global Europe strategy, 2006-2010, Commission Staff Working document, SEC(2010) 1268/2 (Brussels). http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2010/november/tradoc_146941.pdf. Accessed on 02 Sept 2014

  19. Gupwell D, Gupta N (2009) EU FTA negotiations with India, ASEAN and Korea: the question of fair labour standards. Asia Eur J 7(1):79–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jörgensen KE (ed) (1997) Reflective approaches to European Governance. Houndmills, Palgrave

    Google Scholar 

  21. Karat P (2012) A treaty for the rich. Morning Star. 25 May

  22. Khorana S, Asthana A (2014) EU FTA negotiations with India: the question of liberalization of public procurement. Asia Eur J. doi:10.1007/s10308-014-0369-7

    Google Scholar 

  23. Khorana S, Garcia M (2013) European Union-India FTA: one step forward, one back? J Common Mark Stud 51(4):684–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Khorana S, Garcia M (2014) Procurement liberalization diffusion in EU agreements: signalling stewardship? J World Trade 48(3):481–500

    Google Scholar 

  25. Khorana S, Perdikis N (2010) EU-India free trade agreement: deal or No deal? South Asia Econ J 11(2):181–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Khorana S, Subramanian S (2012) Potential accession to the WTO government procurement agreement: a case study on India. J Int Econ Law 15(1):287–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Khorana S, Perdikis N, Kerr WA, Yueng M (2011) The Era of bilateral agreements: the EU and India in search of a partnership. Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 1–225

  28. Krishna P (2009) In: Lester S, Mercurio B (eds) The economics of PTAs in bilateral and regional trade agreements- commentary and analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 11–27

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lamy P (2002) Stepping stones or stumbling blocks? The EU’s approach towards the problem of multilateralism vs regionalism in trade policy. World Econ 25(10):1399–1413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Langan M (2012) Normative power Europe and the moral economy of Africa–EU ties. New Polit Econ 7(3):243–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Manners I (2000) Normative power Europe: a contradiction in terms? Copenhagen Peace Research Institute, Working paper 38/2000

  32. Manners I (2002) Normative power Europe: a contradiction in terms? J Common Mark Stud 40(2):235–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Manners I (2006) The European Union as a normative power: a response to Thomas Diez. Millennium J Int Stud 35(1):167–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Manners I (2008) The normative ethics of the European Union. Int Aff 84(1):45–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Manners I (2011) The European Union’s normative power: critical perspectives and perspectives on the critical. In: Whitman R (ed) Normative power Europe: empirical and theoretical perspectives. Basingstoke, Palgrave, pp 226–247

    Google Scholar 

  36. Manners I, Whitman RG (2003) The ‘difference engine’: constructing and representing the international identity of the European Union. J Eur Publ Pol 10(3):380–404

  37. Maull HW (1990) Germany and Japan: the New civilian powers. For Aff 69(5):91–106

    Google Scholar 

  38. Meincke B (2013) The EU-India-FTA: Development and Growth for Each and Everybody?Macroeconomics and Gender. Report for Heinrich Boll Stiftung, New Delhi. http://in.boell.org/2013/12/10/eu-india-fta-development-and-growth-each-and-everybody-macroeconomics-gender. Accessed on 02 Sept 2014

  39. Meunier S, Nicolaidis K (2006) The European Union as a conflicted trade power. J Eur Pub Pol 13(6):906–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Morlino L (2003) Democrazie e Democratizzazioni. Bologna, Italy Mulino, pp 18–31

  41. Nicolaïdis K, Whitman R (eds) (2013) Special Issue on Normative Power Europe. Cooperation and Conflict 48(2)

  42. Orbie J (2008) A civilian power in the world? instruments and objectives in EU external policies. In: Orbie J (ed) Europe’s global role. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 1–34

    Google Scholar 

  43. Orbie J (2011) Promoting labour standards through trade: normative power or regulatory state Europe? In: Whitman R (ed) Normative power Europe: empirical and theoretical perspectives. Palgrave, Basingstoke, pp 161–187

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rosamond B (2013) Three ways of speaking Europe to the world: markets, peace, cosmopolitan duty and the EU’s normative power. Brit J Polit Int Relat 16(1):133–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Sen A (2013) EU won’t get further access to government business. The Economic Times. http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2012-04-02/news/31275525_1_government-procurement-karel-de-gucht-meeting-with-eu-trade. Accessed on 02 Sept 2014

  46. Siles-Brügge G (2014) EU trade and development policy beyond the ACP: subordinating developmental to commercial imperatives in the reform of GSP. Contemp Polit 20(1):49–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Sjursen H (ed) (2006) Civilian or military power? the European Union at a crossroads. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  48. Storey A (2006) Normative power Europe? economic partnership agreements and Africa. J Contemp Afr Stud 24(3):331–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Whitman RG (2013) The neo-normative turn in theorising the EU’s international presence. Cooperation and conflict 48(2):171–193

  50. Witchterich C, Menon-Sen K (2009) Trade liberalisation, gender equality: The case of the contested EU-India FTA. WIDE Paper HB Stiftung, Brussels, Policy Space. http://www.in.boell.org/downloads/Trade_Liberalisation__Gender_Equality_Policy_Space_the_case_of_the_contested_EU_India_FTA_.pdf Accessed 5 June 2014

  51. Young AR, Peterson J (2006) The EU and the new trade politics. J Eur Publ Pol 13(6):795–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Zahrnt V (2005) How regionalisation can be a pillar of a more effective world trade organization. J World Trade 39(4):671–699

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Orbie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Orbie, J., Khorana, S. Normative versus market power Europe? The EU-India trade agreement. Asia Eur J 13, 253–264 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-015-0427-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • European Union
  • International Labour Organization
  • Partner Country
  • Government Procurement
  • International Labour Organization Convention