Dead on arrival: normative EU policy towards China

Abstract

The European Union’s (EU) normative roles in global politics have in recent years been a hotly debated topic. The EU promotes its political values outside of the Union, especially with regard to prospective accession countries and small developing countries. However, a normative foreign policy approach encounters considerable challenges when confronted with major powers, such as China and Russia that do not share the political values promoted by the EU. Attempts at pursuing a normative policy towards these countries often come across as halfhearted. This article discusses EU normative policy towards China. It identifies loss of the moral high ground, conflicting positions of EU members and lack of leverage as the three main factors hampering it. It needs to be recognised that these problems are fundamental and stem from the very nature of the EU itself. The article argues that instead of a halfhearted offensive normative approach towards China or ubiquitous dialogues with partners, the EU may be better off with a more determined policy of defensive normativity. This would entail being more insistent in upholding European values within our own community rather than seeking to export them outside of the Union, and favouring demand-driven cooperation. The choice stands between altering the self-image of the EU to make it better correspond to reality, or making reality live up to the self-image.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Acquis communautaire refers to the total body of accumulated EU law, acquis politique to the accumulated EU political practice.

  2. 2.

    The author used the Eur-Lex database on January 30, 2009 to search for common positions and joint actions where the target country was mentioned in the title.

  3. 3.

    (Bailes 2008: 129–130) has argued that the EU’s evolving into a “real” collective defence community would make it more thoroughly militarised than anything imaginable today and would make it run the risk of acquiring more overt enemies.

  4. 4.

    Excerpt from Neil Young’s song Rockin’ in the free world.

  5. 5.

    After 9/11, Robert Kagan famously described Americans as being from Mars and Europeans from Venus when it comes to their views on international politics (Kagan 2002).

  6. 6.

    Former Trade Commissioner Peter Mandelson acknowledged that the EU cannot prescribe solutions to China on its domestic issues. China Daily 16 April 2008, EU cannot “dictate” solutions to China’s problems.

References

  1. Aggestam L (2006) Role theory and European foreign policy. A framework for analysis. In: Elgström O, Smith M (eds) The European Union’s roles in international politics. Concepts and analysis. Routledge, London, pp 11–29

    Google Scholar 

  2. Archik K et al (2005) European Union’s arms embargo on China: implications and options for U.S. policy. In: CRS report for congress. http://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RL32870.pdf. Accessed 11 Mar 2009

  3. Bailes AK (2008) The EU and a ‘better world’: what role for the European security and defence policy. Int Aff 84(1):115–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Balducci G (2010) The limits of normative power Europe: the case of human rights in China. East Asia 27:35–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barbé E, Johansson-Nogués E (2008) The EU as a modest ‘force for good’: the European neighbourhood policy. Int Aff 84(1):81–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Beck U (2005) On post-national war. Secur Dialogue 36(1):5–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Berkofsky A (2006) The EU–China strategic partnership: rhetoric versus reality. In: Zaborowski M (ed) Facing China’s rise: guideline for an EU strategy. Chaillot Paper no. 94. European Institute for Security Studies, Paris, pp 103–114

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bodeen C (2009) China will never be a democracy. The Herald 10 March 2009

  9. Bordonaro F (2007) For Paris, there’s no China la rupture. Asia Times online 7 Dec 2007

  10. Brantner F, Gowan R (2009) Complex engagement: The EU and the UN system. In: Jorgensen KE (ed) The European Union and international organizations. Routledge, London, pp 37–60

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chen Z (2005) Nationalism, internationalism and Chinese foreign policy. J Contemp China 14(2):35–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. China Daily 16 April 2008, EU cannot ‘dictate’ solutions to China’s problems

  13. COM (1995) 279 final. A long-term policy for China–Europe relations. Communication of the European Commission. European Commission, Brussels

  14. COM (2006) 631 final. EU–China: Closer partners, growing responsibilities. Communication from the European Commission to the Council and the European Parliament

  15. Council declaration 6885/1/06 REV 1 (Presse 63) P 038/06

  16. Council declaration 7328/1/08 REV 1 (Presse 65) P 31/08

  17. Council meeting 2622, document 14724/04 (Presse 325)

  18. De Goede M (2008) The politics of pre-emption and the war on terror in Europe. Eur J Int Relat 14(1):161–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Duchêne F (1972) Europe’s role in world peace. In: Mayne R (ed) Europe tomorrow: sixteen Europeans look ahead. Fontana, London, pp 32–47

    Google Scholar 

  20. ESS 2003: A secure Europe in a better world, Brussels 12 December 2003

  21. European Parliament, The EU’s external relations. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/parliament/expert/displayFtu.do?id=74&ftuId=FTU_6.1.2.html&language=en. Accessed 11 Mar 2009

  22. Forsberg T (2011) Normative power Europe, once again: a conceptual clarification of an ideal type. J Common Mark S 49(6):1183–1204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Forsberg T, Graeme PH (2005) The EU, human rights, and the Russo-Chechen conflict. Polit Sci Quart 120(3):455–478

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fox J, Godement F (2009) A power audit of EU–China relations. European Council on Foreign Relations. http://ecfr.3cdn.net/532cd91d0b5c9699ad_ozm6b9bz4.pdf. Accessed 25 Aug 2009

  25. Gowan R, Brantner F (2008) A global force for human rights? An audit of power at the UN. European Council on Foreign Relations. http://ecfr.3cdn.net/3a4f39da1b34463d16_tom6b928f.pdf. Accessed 20 Feb 2012

  26. Holslag J (2010) Europe’s normative disconnect with the emerging powers. BICCS Asia Paper 5(4):1–21

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hyde-Price A (2006) ‘Normative’ power Europe: a realist critique. J Eur Public Policy 13(2):217–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hyde-Price A (2008) A ‘tragic actor’? A realist perspective on ‘ethical power Europe’. Int Aff 84(1):29–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Johnston AI (2003) Is China a status quo power? Int Security 27(4):5–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Joint statement 2007. Joint statement of the 10th EU–China summit, Beijing, (28 November)

  31. Kagan R (2002) Power and weakness. Policy Rev 113:3–28

    Google Scholar 

  32. Keukeleire S et al (2011) The EU foreign policy towards the BRICS and other emerging powers: objectives and strategies (ad hoc study). The European Parliament, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  33. Koskenniemi M (2004) International law and hegemony: a reconfiguration. Camb Rev Int Aff 17(2):197–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Laïdi Z (2008) Norms over force: the enigma of european power. Palgrave Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lerch M, Schwellnus G (2006) Normative by nature? The role of coherence in justifying the EU’s external human rights policy. J Eur Public Policy 13(2):304–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lisbonne-de Vergeron K (2007) Contemporary Chinese views of Europe. Royal Institute of International Affairs, London

    Google Scholar 

  37. Manners I (2002) Normative power Europe: a contradiction in terms? J Common Mark S 40(2):235–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Manners I (2006) The symbolic manifestation of the EU’s normative role in world politics. In: Elgström O, Smith M (eds) The European Union’s roles in international politics. Concepts and analysis. Routledge, London, pp 66–84

    Google Scholar 

  39. Manners I (2008) The normative ethics of the European Union. Int Aff 84(1):65–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Matlary JH (2006) When soft power turns hard: is an EU strategic culture possible? Secur Dialogue 37(1):105–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Mattlin M (2009) Thinking clearly on political strategy: the formulation of common EU policy toward China. In: Gaens B, Jokela J, Limnell E (eds) The role of the European Union in Asia. China and India as strategic partners. Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot, pp 95–120

    Google Scholar 

  42. Maull HW (2005) Europe and the new global balance of power. Int Aff 81(4):775–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Panebianco S (2006) Promoting human rights and democracy in European Union relations with Russia and China. In: Lucarelli S, Manners I (eds) Values and principles in European Union foreign policy. Routledge, Oxon, pp 130–146

    Google Scholar 

  44. Privacy International, Leading surveillance societies in the EU and the world. https://www.privacyinternational.org/article/leading-surveillance-societies-eu-and-world-2007. Accessed 2 Feb 2012

  45. Shambaugh D (2004) The new strategic triangle: U.S. and European reactions to China’s rise. Wash Quart 28(3):7–25

    Google Scholar 

  46. Sjursen H (2006) Values or rights? Alternative conceptions of the EU’s ‘normative’ role. In: Elgström O, Smith M (eds) The European Union’s roles in international politics. Concepts and analysis. Routledge, London, pp 85–100

    Google Scholar 

  47. Song X (2010) European ‘models’ and their implications to China: internal and external perspectives. Rev Int Stud 36:755–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Sparaco P, Wall R (2004) Chinese checkers. Aviat Week Space Tec 161(23):37–38

    Google Scholar 

  49. Statement by Javier Solana S083/06, Brussels 6 March 2007

  50. Statement by Javier Solana S307/07, Brussels 25 October 2007

  51. Vaïsse J, Kundani H (2012) European foreign policy paper 2012. http://www.ecfr.eu/page/-/ECFR_SCORECARD_2012_WEB.pdf. Accessed 20 Feb 2012

  52. Yan X (2011) International leadership and norm evolution. Chin J Int Pol 4(3):233–264

    Google Scholar 

  53. Youngs R (2001) The European Union and the promotion of democracy. Europe’s Mediterranean and Asian policies. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  54. Zimmermann H (2007) Realist power Europe? The EU in negotiations about China’s and Russia’s WTO succession. J Common Mark S 45(4):813–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Ella och Georg Ehrnrooths stiftelse and the Finnish Foreign Ministry for providing funding to support the research for this article. The author would also like to thank Timo Behr, Tuomas Forsberg, Bart Gaens, Jonathan Holslag, Jyrki Kallio, Hanna Ojanen, Hannu Ripatti, Teija Tiilikainen, Mikko Tyrväinen and Antto Vihma for helpful comments. An earlier version appeared as a FIIA Working Paper in September 2010.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mikael Mattlin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mattlin, M. Dead on arrival: normative EU policy towards China. Asia Eur J 10, 181–198 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-012-0321-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • European Union
  • Member State
  • Foreign Policy
  • Normative Approach
  • European Union Country