Abstract
Due to economic interdependency through trade and investment, economies of scale, and economic complementarities, China and the European Union (EU) have a huge potential for cooperation. Already many things have happened so far. Since 2004, the cooperation on climate change has been a key issue on the political agenda of China–EU summits. In 2005, the EU and China even endorsed a “Joint Declaration on Climate Change” which emphasizes reducing the cost of clean energy key technologies for China, first and foremost through the development and deployment of near-to-zero-emission CCS technology. Letting China gain access to clean energy technology is the key issue of climate change cooperation. Despite great efforts and potential mutual benefits, this is still a field of conflicting interests. The authors argue that currently, cooperation on the transfer of clean energy technology is very limited due to rational interests of the actors and the insecurities involved in cooperation.
This is a preview of subscription content,
to check access.Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aggarwal V, Dupont C (2005) Collaboration and coordination in the global political economy. In: Ravenhill J (ed) Global Political Economy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 28–48
Chatham House (2007) Changing climates—interdependencies on energy and climate security for China and Europe. The Royal Institute of International Affairs, London
E3G (Third Generation Environmentalism) (2008) New EU Climate Change Package fails to tame King Coal. http://www.e3g.org/images/uploads/Media_Brief_-_New_EU_Climate_Change_Package_Fails_to_Tame_King_Coal.pdf (11.02.2008). Accessed 2008
European Commission (2005) EU and China Partnership on Climate Change. http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=MEMO/05/298. Accessed 02 Nov 2008
European Commission (2007) European Strategic Energy Technology Plan. http://ec.europa.eu/energy/res/setplan/doc/com_2007/com_2007_0723_en.pdf. Accessed 02 Nov 2008
European Commission (2008) Homepage of the Delegation of the European Commission to China. http://www.delchn.ec.europa.eu/euch_scie_gene1.htm. Accessed 02 Nov 2008
Jesse NG, Heo U, De Rouen K (2002) A nested game approach to political and economic liberalization in democratizing states: the case of South Korea. Intl Studies Quarterly 46(3):401–422
Morgan J (2008) EU commitments on climate: strengths and weaknesses. http://www.chinadialogue.net/homepage/show/single/en/1731-EU-commitments-on-climate-strengths-and-weaknesses. Accessed 02 Nov 2008
National Development and Reform Commission (2007) China’s National Climate Change Programme. http://en.ndrc.gov.cn/newsrelease/P020070604561191006823.pdf. Accessed 02 Nov 2008
People’s Daily Online (2004) China to continue to pursue new security concept for world peace. http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/200412/27/eng20041227_168809.html. Accessed 02 Nov 2008
Shirk S (1993) The political logic of economic reform in China. University of California Press, Oxford, pp 3–20
Stern Review (2006) Stern review on the economics of climate change, executive summary. http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/media/4/3/Executive_Summary.pdf. Accessed 02 Nov 2008
Tsebelis G (1990) Nested games: rational choice in comparative politics. University of California Press, Berkeley
Zhang H (张海滨) (2008) 环境与国际关系 : 全球环境问题的理性思考, 上海人民出版社, pp 93–94
Acknowledgements
The authors owe their gratitude to Professor Ji Mi and Professor Wang Yong of the School of International Studies of Peking University for their valuable remarks and suggestions, which have contributed to this paper significantly.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Professor Zhang’s research focus is on environmental issues and international organizations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Holzer, C., Zhang, H. The potentials and limits of China–EU cooperation on climate change and energy security. Asia Europe J 6, 217–227 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-008-0183-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-008-0183-1