Abstract
Practitioners and researchers have repeatedly portrayed the Asia–Europe Meeting as an institution that is not fully able to realize its agenda-setting potential in global negotiations or discourses. This paper argues that this assessment basically holds true even after 10 years of cooperation: Although ASEM tries to improve on this meagre balance by establishing a virtual secretariat and advancing common positions on trade, finance and environmental issues, cooperation between Asian and European states is frequently marred by the pitfalls of informality and the antagonisms of different cooperation cultures. Yet, successful moulding of common positions on climate change resulting in the adoption of a respective declaration may indicate an improved multilateral effectiveness of ASEM.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ASEM 2 (1998) Chairman’s statement of the Second Asia-Europe Meeting (http://www.aseminfoboard.org/content/documents/chairmans_statement_asem_2.pdf)
ASEM 6 (2006a) Declaration on climate change (http://www.asem6.fi/news_and_documents/en_GB/1157981028054/_files/75889449382578510/default/Climate_change.pdf)
ASEM 6 (2006b) Helsinki Declaration on the Future of ASEM (2006) (http://www.asem6.fi/news_and_documents/en_GB/1157981074064)
Dieter H (1999) Die Asienkrise. Marburg, Germany
EMM 2 (Second Economic Ministers’ Meeting) (1999) Chairman’s statement (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/external_relations/asem/min_other_meeting/eco_min2.htm)
Forster A (1999) The European Union in South-East Asia: continuity and change in turbulent times. Int Aff 175(4S):153–177
Koch E (1998) Internationale Wirtschaftsbeziehungen. Band 2: Internationale Wirtschafts—und Finanzbeziehungen, München
Lee C (2000) The Asian turbulence: a case study in economic security. In: ders. (Hrsg): Asia–Europe Cooperation after the 1997–1998 Asian Turbulence, Aldershot S 33–54
Loewen H (2003) Theorie und Empirie transregionaler Kooperation am Beispiel des Asia–Europe Meeting (ASEM) Hamburg
Loewen H (2004) Cooperation culture—notions on the significance of cultural norms and principles in regional and interregional cooperation-processes. Part 1: defining cooperation culture and empirical evidence from the European Union (EU) and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). In: Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai, Studia Europaea, XLIX, 1–2, pp. 91–102
Neuschwander T (2000) WTO/GATT (Welthandelsorganisation). In: Woyke, Wichard (Hrsg.): Handwörterbuch Internationale Politik. Opladen S 546–552
OECD (1999) Asia and the global crisis. Paris
Pou Serradell V (1996) The Asia–Europe Meeting (ASEM): a historical turning point in relations between the two regions. European Foreign Affairs Review 2S:185–210
Rüland J (1999) The future of the ASEM process. In: Stockhof, Wim/Van der Velde, Paul (eds) ASEM. A window of opportunity, Leiden and Amsterdam, pp. 126–151
Rüland J (2001) SEAN and the European Union: A Bumby interregional relationship. In: ZEI Discussion Paper, Bonn
WTO (1996) Singapore Ministerial Declaration, WTO-Ministerkonferenz in Singapur, 9–13 Dezember 1996, Punkt 4 (Core Labour Standards), WTO, MIN(96)/DEC
WTO (1999) Ministerial Conference, Third Session, Seattle, 30 Nov–3 December 1999, WTO, WT/MIN(99)ST/33
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Howard Loewen is senior research fellow at the Institute of Asian Studies (now part of GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies) in Hamburg.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Loewen, H. East Asia and Europe—partners in global politics?. AEJ 5, 23–31 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-006-0103-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-006-0103-1