Asia Europe Journal

, 4:417 | Cite as

Working together: local and global imperatives for women in Mongolia

Original Paper
  • 194 Downloads

Abstract

Mongolia is a country in transition. Domestic violence has just begun to reach the public and political agenda, due in large part to the activism and lobbying of women’s groups within Mongolia. State attention to domestic violence accords with Mongolia’s declared democratic and human rights agendas which are driven by political and economic shifts within society, the influence of trans-national feminism and the activities of two of the most influential non-governmental organisations (NGOs), each of which focus on violence against women. Local, feminist campaigning intersects with the global imperatives of treaty obligations and has resulted in the introduction of new legislation on domestic violence in 2004. Since then it has become apparent that there is a gap between the rhetoric of the law the reality of implementation. Women’s groups are battling this lack of political will to effectively implement changes.

Keywords

Mongolia Feminism Domestic violence Violence against women Activism Globalisation 

References

  1. CIA World Factbook (2006) Information on Mongolia. Website last accessed 1st January 2006 http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/mg.html
  2. Ferree Myra Marx, Hess Beth B (1995) Controversy and coalition: the new feminist movement across three decades of change, revised edn. Twayne, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Ferree Myra Marx, Martin Patricia Yancey (eds) (1995) Feminist organizations: harvest of the new women’s movement. Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  4. Fish MS (1998) Mongolia: democracy without prerequisites. J Democr 9(3):127–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kriesberg Lawrence (1997) Social movements and global transformation. In: Jackie Smith, Charles Chatfield, Ron Pagnucco (eds) Transnational social movements and global politics. Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. McDonagh E (2002) Political citizenship and democratization: the gender paradox. Am Polit Sci Rev 96(3):535–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Moghadam VM (2000) Transnational feminist networks: collective action in an era of globalization. Int Sociol 15(1):57–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mongolia Information (2006) Asia planet. Website last accessed 1st January 2006 http://www.asia-planet.net/mongolia/government.htm
  9. Murphy BK (2000) International NGOs and the challenge of modernity. Dev Prac 10(3 & 4):330–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. MWLA (2006) Mission statement. Website last accessed 1st January 2006 http://www.owc.org.mn/mwla/index.htm
  11. NCAV (2006) Mission statement. Website last accessed 1st January 2006 http://www.ncav.org/en/
  12. Pandey RN (2002) The use of induced abortion as a contraceptive: the case of Mongolia. J Biosoc Sci 34(1):91–108Google Scholar
  13. Scott EK (1998) Creating partnerships for change: alliances and betrayals in the racial politics of two feminist organizations. Gend Soc 12(4):400–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sklair L (1999) Competing conceptions of globalization. J World-Syst Res 2:143–162Google Scholar
  15. Staggenborg S (2001) Beyond culture versus politics: a case study of a local women's movement. Gender & Society 15(4):507–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. UNESCO (2004) Women’s/gender studies in Asia Pacific’, regional unit for social and human sciences in Asia and the Pacific. Asia and Pacific Regional Bureau for Education. UNESCO, BangkokGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Manchester Metropolitan UniversityWest ManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations