Skip to main content
Log in

Perinatale Risiken für die nach assistierter Reproduktion konzipierten Kinder im Vergleich zu deren spontan konzipierten Geschwisterkindern

Perinatal risks for children conceived by assisted reproduction compared to their spontaneously conceived siblings

  • Journal Club
  • Published:
Gynäkologische Endokrinologie Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Berntsen S, Söderström-Anttila V, Wennerholm UB et al (2019) The health of children conceived by ART: ‘The chicken or the egg?’. Hum Reprod Update 25:137–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dhalwani NN, Boulet SL, Kissin DM et al (2016) Assisted reproductive technology and perinatal outcomes: Conventional versus discordant-sibling design. Fertil Steril 106:710–716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Goisis A, Remes H, Martikainen P et al (2019) Medically assisted reproduction and birth outcomes: A within-family analysis using Finnish population registers. Lancet 393:1225–1232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Henningsen AK, Pinborg A, Lidegaard O et al (2011) Perinatal outcome of singleton siblings born after assisted reproductive technology and spontaneous conception: Danish national sibling-cohort study. Fertil Steril 95:959–963

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Romundstad LB, Romundstad PR, Sunde A et al (2008) Effects of technology or maternal factors on perinatal outcome after assisted fertilisation: A population-based cohort study. Lancet 372:737–743

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Seidman DS, Ever-Hadani P, Stevenson DK et al (1988) Birth order and birth weight reexamined. Obstet Gynecol 72:158–162

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara Sonntag.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

B. Sonntag gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Additional information

Redaktion

H. Fluhr, Heidelberg

M. Goeckenjan, Dresden

R. Popovici, München

B. Sonntag, Hamburg

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sonntag, B. Perinatale Risiken für die nach assistierter Reproduktion konzipierten Kinder im Vergleich zu deren spontan konzipierten Geschwisterkindern. Gynäkologische Endokrinologie 17, 182–183 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10304-019-0258-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10304-019-0258-7

Navigation