Literatur
Berntsen S, Söderström-Anttila V, Wennerholm UB et al (2019) The health of children conceived by ART: ‘The chicken or the egg?’. Hum Reprod Update 25:137–158
Dhalwani NN, Boulet SL, Kissin DM et al (2016) Assisted reproductive technology and perinatal outcomes: Conventional versus discordant-sibling design. Fertil Steril 106:710–716
Goisis A, Remes H, Martikainen P et al (2019) Medically assisted reproduction and birth outcomes: A within-family analysis using Finnish population registers. Lancet 393:1225–1232
Henningsen AK, Pinborg A, Lidegaard O et al (2011) Perinatal outcome of singleton siblings born after assisted reproductive technology and spontaneous conception: Danish national sibling-cohort study. Fertil Steril 95:959–963
Romundstad LB, Romundstad PR, Sunde A et al (2008) Effects of technology or maternal factors on perinatal outcome after assisted fertilisation: A population-based cohort study. Lancet 372:737–743
Seidman DS, Ever-Hadani P, Stevenson DK et al (1988) Birth order and birth weight reexamined. Obstet Gynecol 72:158–162
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Interessenkonflikt
B. Sonntag gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Additional information
Redaktion
H. Fluhr, Heidelberg
M. Goeckenjan, Dresden
R. Popovici, München
B. Sonntag, Hamburg
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sonntag, B. Perinatale Risiken für die nach assistierter Reproduktion konzipierten Kinder im Vergleich zu deren spontan konzipierten Geschwisterkindern. Gynäkologische Endokrinologie 17, 182–183 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10304-019-0258-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10304-019-0258-7