Skip to main content
Log in

Anatomische Ursachen bei habituellen Aborten

Diagnostik und Therapie

Anatomical causes of habitual abortion

Diagnostics and treatment

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Gynäkologische Endokrinologie Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Angeborene Fehlbildungen

Die häufigsten Anomalien des Uterus bei habituellen Aborten sind angeborene Fehlbildungen mit einer Inzidenz von etwa 13 %. Eine frühe, möglichst 3-D-sonographische Diagnostik sollte immer angeboten werden. Der Uterus septus oder subseptus entsteht durch eine fehlende oder mangelnde Resorption des Septums während der Entwicklung. Die Aborte treten meist im späten ersten Trimenon auf. Eine hysteroskopische Septumresektion (Metroplastik) ist angezeigt, da die Geburtenrate auf > 80 % erhöht werden kann. Bei komplizierten Fehlbildungen (Uterus unicornis, bicornis, didelphys) ist eine erweiterte Diagnostik (MRT) sinnvoll, eine operative Korrektur meist aber nicht notwendig, obwohl die Komplikationsrate in der Spätschwangerschaft auf einem hohen Niveau verbleibt. Eine begleitende Nierenfehlbildung sollte stets sonographisch oder MR-diagnostisch ausgeschlossen werden.

Erworbene Pathologien

Ob die Diagnose und Behandlung erworbener uteriner Pathologien, z. B. von Myomen, Polypen oder Synechien, das Abortrisiko reduzieren kann, ist noch unklar. Eine operative Behandlung empfiehlt sich dennoch in den meisten Fällen.

Abstract

Congenital malformations

The incidence of congenital uterine malformations in women with recurrent pregnancy loss is 13 %. An accurate and objective estimation of the uterus should be offered as soon as possible (particularly using a 3D sonography). The uterus septus or subseptus are the consequence of a defect in the absorption of the uterine septum. Pregnancy loss usually occurs in the late first trimester. A septum resection (metroplasty) by hysteroscopy is indicated, because the birth rate can be improved (> 80 %). In complicated malformations (unicornuate uterus, bicornuate, didelphys), advanced diagnostic imaging (MRI) is useful but surgical correction is normally not necessary, although the complication rate in late pregnancy remains high. Concomitant renal malformation should always be excluded (by ultrasound or MRI).

Acquired pathologies

Whether the diagnosis and treatment of other uterine diseases (as fibroids, polyps, and adhesions) can reduce the risk of miscarriage is still controversial: surgical treatment is usually recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4

Literatur

  1. Acién P, Acién M, Sánchez-Ferrer M (2004) Complex malformations of the female genital tract. New types and revision of classification. Hum Reprod 19:2377–2384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. American Fertility Society (1988) The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, mullerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril 49:944–955

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bermejo C, Martínez Ten P, Cantarero R et al (2010) Three-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis of Mullerian duct anomalies and concordance with magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 35:593–601

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Caliskan E, Ozkan S, Cakiroglu Y et al (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of real-time 3D sonography in the diagnosis of congenital Mullerian anomalies in high-risk patients with respect to the phase of the menstrual cycle. J Clin Ultrasound 38:123–127

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Zamora J et al (2011) The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 17:761–771

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Faivre E, Fernandez H, Deffieux X et al (2012) Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasonography in differential diagnosis of septate and bicornuate uterus compared with office hysteroscopy and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 19:101–106

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fayez JA (1986) Comparison between abdominal and hysteroscopic metroplasty. Obstet Gynecol 68:399–403

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fernandez H, Garbin O, Castaigne V et al (2011) Surgical approach to and reproductive outcome after surgical correction of a T-shaped uterus. Hum Reprod 26:1730–1734

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Grimbizis GF, Camus M, Tarlatzis BC et al (2001) Clinical implications of uterine malformations and hysteroscopic treatment results. Hum Reprod Update 7:161–174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Grimbizis GF, Tsolakidis D, Mikos T et al (2010) A prospective comparison of transvaginal ultrasound, saline infusion sonohysterography, and diagnostic hysteroscopy in the evaluation of endometrial pathology. Fertil Steril 94:2720–2725

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Grimbizis GF, Campo R (2012) Clinical approach for the classification of congenital uterine malformations. Gynecol Surg 9:119–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Homer HA, Li TC, Cooke ID (2000) The septate uterus: a review of management and reproductive outcome. Fertil Steril 73:1–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kowalik CR, Goddijn M, Emanuel MH et al (2011) Metroplasty versus expectant management for women with recurrent miscarriage and a septate uterus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6:CD008576

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. March CM (2011) Management of Asherman’s syndrome. Reprod Biomed Online 23:63–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nahum GG (2002) Rudimentary uterine horn pregnancy. The 20th-century worldwide experience of 588 cases. J Reprod Med 47:151–163

    Google Scholar 

  16. Olpin JD, Heilbrun M (2009) Imaging of Mullerian duct anomalies. Clin Obstet Gynecol 52:40–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Renbaum L, Ufberg D, Sammel M et al (2002) Reliability of clinicians versus radiologists for detecting abnormalities on hysterosalpingogram films. Fertil Steril 78:614–618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Saravelos SH, Cocksedge KA, Li TC (2008) Prevalence and diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies in women with reproductive failure: a critical appraisal. Hum Reprod Update 14:415–429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sefrioui O, Azyez M, Babahabib A et al (2004) Pregnancy in rudimentary uterine horn: diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 32:308–310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt für sich und seine Koautorin an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Santi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Santi, A., Rohner, S. Anatomische Ursachen bei habituellen Aborten. Gynäkologische Endokrinologie 11, 89–94 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10304-012-0517-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10304-012-0517-3

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation