Zusammenfassung
Eine ovartoxische Therapie kommt nicht nur bei Malignomen zum Einsatz sondern auch bei schweren Autoimmunerkrankungen (AID). Hier wird v. a. das immunsuppressiv wirksame Cyclophosphamid genutzt. Häufig sind junge Frauen vor Abschluss der Familienplanung betroffen. Da das Langzeitüberleben durch verbesserte Therapiemethoden deutlich gestiegen ist, stellt der Schutz der Ovarialfunktion eine wichtige Maßnahme dar.
In diesem Zusammenhang müssen krankheitsspezifische Risiken bei AID beachtet werden. Am Beispiel des systemischen Lupus erythematodes (SLE) – eine der häufigeren AID und die einzige, für die Daten zum Fertilitätserhalt vorliegen – werden die üblichen Maßnahmen anhand der aktuellen Literatur dargestellt.
Gonadotropin-Releasing-Hormon(GnRH)-Analoga können aufgrund der aktuellen Datenlage allen Patienten empfohlen werden. Eine Kryokonservierung von Ovargewebe ist immer noch experimentell, scheint jedoch vielversprechend und kann mit geringem Risiko und minimaler Zeitverzögerung ebenfalls empfohlen werden. Eine Stimulationstherapie und anschließende Kryokonservierung von Eizellen ist bei Aktivität der Grunderkrankung, insbesondere im Falle des SLE, mit einem erhöhten Risiko einer Exazerbation und thrombembolischen Ereignissen verbunden. Diese Therapieoption sollte daher im Einzelfall abgewogen werden und nur unter engmaschiger Überwachung durch ein interdisziplinäres Team aus Reproduktionsmedizinern und Rheumatologen erfolgen. Eine Kombination der Gabe von GnRH-Analoga mit der Kryokonservierung von Ovargewebe erscheint sinnvoll.
Abstract
Cytotoxic therapy which can harm ovarian function is not only used for malignant diseases but also for severe autoimmune diseases (AID) using mainly the immunosuppressive agent cyclophosphamide. Young women during childbearing age are frequently affected by AID. Due to the significantly improved long-term survival of these patients, preservation of ovarian function is a very important issue.
Disease-specific risks must be taken into consideration when counselling patients with AID for fertility preservation. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is one of the more common forms of AID and the only AID with existing data on fertility preservation. Therefore the available techniques will be discussed on the basis of SLE.
Gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue treatment during cyclophosphamide therapy has been shown to be effective in patients with AID and can be recommended in almost all situations. Cryopreservation of ovarian tissue is still an experimental approach but seems to be very promising. The risk of the necessary laparoscopic surgery and the delay are justifiable. A stimulation therapy for cryopreservation of oocytes has the risk of an exacerbation of the underlying disease and of thromboembolic complications. Therefore this option should only be recommended in isolated cases and under close monitoring of disease activity by an interdisciplinary team of gynecologists and rheumatologists. Treatment with GnRH analogues and cryopreservation of ovarian tissue seems to be a reasonable combination.
Literatur
Fischer-Betz R, Wessel E, Richter J et al (2005) Lupus in Germany: analysis with the German lupus self-help organization (LULA). Z Rheumatol 64:111–122
Robert-Koch-Institut (Hrsg) (2010) Entzündlich-rheumatische Erkrankungen, Heft 49. Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes
Manger K, Wildt L, Kalden JR, Manger B (2006) Prevention of gonadal toxicity and preservation of gonadal function and fertility in young women with systemic lupus erythematosus treated by cyclophosphamide: the PREGO-study. Autoimmun Rev 5:269–272
Clowse ME, Copland SC, Hsieh TC et al (2011) Ovarian reserve diminished by oral cyclophosphamide therapy for granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener’s). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 63:1777–1781
McDermott EM, Powell RJ (1996) Incidence of ovarian failure in systemic lupus erythematosus after treatment with pulse cyclophosphamide. Ann Rheum Dis 55:224–229
Gol M, Saygili U, Koyuncuoglu M et al (2009) Influence of high-dose methotrexate therapy on the primordial follicles of the mouse ovary. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 35:429–433
Husein M, Pingle S (1992) Effect of cyclosporine A at therapeutic and toxic doses on the superluteinized ovaries in BALB/c mice. Transplant Proc 24:1663–1668
Hardy CJ, Palmer BP, Morton SJ et al (1999) Pregnancy outcome and family size in systemic lupus erythematosus: a case-control study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 38:559–563
Skomsvoll JF, Ostensen M, Baste V et al (2001) Number of births, interpregnancy interval, and subsequent pregnancy rate after a diagnosis of inflammatory rheumatic disease in Norwegian women. J Rheumatol 28:2310–2314
Lawrenz B, Henes JC, Henes M et al (2011) Impact of systemic lupus erythematosus on ovarian reserve in premenopausal women: evaluation by using anti-Muellerian hormone. Lupus 20:1193–1197
Wolff M von, Montag M, Dittrich R et al (2011) Fertility preservation in women – a practical guide to preservation techniques and therapeutic strategies in breast cancer, Hodgkin’s lymphoma and borderline ovarian tumours by the fertility preservation network FertiPROTEKT. Arch Gynecol Obstet 284:427–435
Carvalheiras G, Vita P, Marta S et al (2010) Pregnancy and systemic lupus erythematosus: review of clinical features and outcome of 51 pregnancies at a single institution. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 38:302–306
Canti V, Castiglioni MT, Rosa S et al (2012) Pregnancy outcomes in patients with systemic autoimmunity. Autoimmunity 45:169–175
Ben-Aharon I, Gafter-Gvili A, Leibovici L et al (2010) Pharmacological interventions for fertility preservation during chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 122:803–811
Clowse ME, Behera MA, Anders CK et al (2009) Ovarian preservation by GnRH agonists during chemotherapy: a meta-analysis. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 18:311–319
Adashi EY (1994) Long-term gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist therapy: the evolving issue of steroidal ‚add-back‘ paradigms. Hum Reprod 9:1380–1397
Bellver J, Pellicer A (2009) Ovarian stimulation for ovulation induction and in vitro fertilization in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid syndrome. Fertil Steril 92:1803–1810
Casoli P, Tumiati B, La Sala G (1997) Fatal exacerbation of systemic lupus erythematosus after induction of ovulation. J Rheumatol 24:1639–1640
Clowse ME, Magder LS, Witter F et al (2005) The impact of increased lupus activity on obstetric outcomes. Arthritis Rheum 52:514–521
Liu J, Zhao Y, Song Y et al (2012) Pregnancy in women with systemic lupus erythematosus: a retrospective study of 111 pregnancies in Chinese women. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 25:261–266
Tuin J, Sanders JS, Joode AA de et al (2011) Pregnancy in women diagnosed with ANCA-associated vasculitis: favorable outcome for mother and child. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) (im Druck)
Gatto M, Iaccarino L, Canova M et al (2011) Pregnancy and vasculitis: a systematic review of the literature. Autoimmun Rev (im Druck)
Lidar M, Langevitz P (2011) Pregnancy issues in scleroderma. Autoimmun Rev (im Druck)
Miniati I, Guiducci S, Mecacci F et al (2008) Pregnancy in systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 47(Suppl 3):iii16–18
Hussein SZ, Jacobsson LT, Lindquist PG et al (2011) Pregnancy and fetal outcome in women with primary Sjogren’s syndrome compared with women in the general population: a nested case-control study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 50:1612–1617
Tyndall AJ, Bannert B, Vonk M et al (2010) Causes and risk factors for death in systemic sclerosis: a study from the EULAR scleroderma trials and research (EUSTAR) database. Ann Rheum Dis 69:1809–1815
Chopra S, Suri V, Bagga R et al (2008) Autoimmune inflammatory myopathy in pregnancy. Medscape J Med 10:17
Interessenkonflikt
Der korrespondierende Autor gibt für sich und seine Koautoren an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Henes, M., Henes, J., Schmalzing, M. et al. Fertilitätsprotektion bei rheumatologischen Erkrankungen. Gynäkologische Endokrinologie 10, 105–109 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10304-011-0457-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10304-011-0457-3