Skip to main content
Log in

Aktive und passive Immunisierung

Active and passive immunization

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Gynäkologische Endokrinologie Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Das Geheimnis der Immuntoleranz des semiallogenen Embryos in der erfolgreich etablierten Gravidität beruht auf Immunmodulationen in verschiedenen Ebenen wie der embryomaternalen Interphase, dem peripheren und angeborenen Immunsystem. Diese Immunmodulation weist Analogien zum Tumorwachstum auf, allerdings mit dem entscheidenden Unterschied, dass Limitierungen und Kontrollmechanismen Platz greifen. Wesentliche Pfeiler der Immuntoleranz sind einerseits die Bevorzugung förderlicher T-Helfer-Lymphozyten, die mit ihrer Zytokinexpression die Implantation favorisieren, und andererseits die fehlende Expression von MHC-Ia-Antigenen. Aus diesen Erkenntnissen resultiert aber bislang kein geeignetes Konzept für eine Immuntestung bei rezidivierenden Implantationsfehlern. Diese Situation und eine nicht auf Evidenz basierte Datenlage lässt jegliche Immuntherapie empirisch erscheinen. Sowohl der aktiven Immunisierung mit allogenen Lymphozyten als auch der passiven Immunisierung mit intravenösen Immunglobulinen haftet die nicht existente Validisierung der Effektivität an. Sie ist die Voraussetzung dafür, dass die Immunisierung Bestandteil der adjunktiven Maßnahmen im ART werden kann.

Abstract

The immune tolerance of successfully implanted semi-allogenic embryos depends on immune modulation on different levels: the embryo-maternal interface, the peripheral immune system, and the innate immune system. This immune modulation shows similarities with how tumors grow, but with an important difference: there are limitations and control mechanisms during placentation. Critical components of immune tolerance are the environment conducive to T-helper lymphocytes, whose cytokine expression favors implantation, and the lack of expression of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) Ia antigens. Despite this, no immunological testing has yet been developed for repeated implantation failure (RIF). This, along with non-evidence-based data, makes any immune therapy appear empirical. The effectiveness of active immunization using allogenic lymphocytes and of passive immunization using intravenous immunoglobulin has not been validated. This is necessary for immunization to be considered as an adjunctive therapy to assisted reproduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Balasch J, Creus M, Fabregues F et al (1996) Intravenous immunoglobulin preceding in vitro fertilization – embryo transfer for patients with repeated failure of embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 65:655–658

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Beer AE, Kwak JY, Ruiz JE (1996) Immunophenotypic profiles of peripheral blood lymphocytes in women with recurrent pregnancy losses and in infertile women with multiple failed in vitro fertilization cycles. Am J Reprod Immunol 35:376–382

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Carrington B, Sack G, Regan L (2005) Recurrent miscarriage: pathophysiology and outcome. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 17:591–597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Christiansen OB, Nielsen HS, Kolte AM (2006) Future directions of failed implantation and recurrent miscarriage research. Reprod Biomed Online 13:71–83

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Clark DA (2007) Should paternal leukocyte immunization be used in RPL? – For. In: Carp HJA (ed) Recurrent pregnancy loss. Causes, controversies and treatment. Informa Healthcare, London, pp 179–184

  6. Clark DA, Coulam CB, Stricker RB (2006) Is intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) efficacious in early pregnancy failure? A critical review and meta-analysis for patients who fail in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF). J Assist Reprod Genet 23:1–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Coulam CB, Krysa LW, Bustillo M (1994) Intravenous immunoglobulin for in-vitro fertilization failure. Hum Reprod 9:2265–2269

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. De Placido G, Zullo F, Mollo A et al (1994) Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in the prevention of implantation failures. Ann N Y Acad Sci 734:232–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. DIR (1998) Deutsches IVF-Register, Jahrbuch 1998. Ärztekammer Schleswig-Holstein, Bad Segeberg

  10. Elram T, Simon A, Isreal S et al (2005) Treatment of recurrent IVF failure and human leukocyte antigen similarity by intravenous immunoglobulin. Reprod Biomed Online 11:745–749

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hornstein MD, Davis OK, Massay JB et al (2006) Antiphospholipid antibodies and in vitro fertilization success: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 73:330–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kallen CB, Arici A (2003) Immune testing in fertility practice: truth or deception? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 18:440–445

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kleinstein J, Khanaga O, Gips H et al (1994) Intravenous immunoglobulins increase pregnancy rate in an IVF program. 41st Annual Meeting, Society for Gynecologic Investigation, Chicago Illinois, abstr. P108

  14. Kling C, Magez-Zunker J, Jenisch S et al (2002) Einfluss der aktiven Lymphozyten-Immunisierung bei Paaren mit wiederholtem Implantationsversagen. Geburtsh Frauenheilkd 62:661–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kling C, Steinmann J, Westphal E et al (2006) Adverse effects of intradermal allogeneic lymphocyte immunotherapy: acute reactions and role of autoimmunity. Hum Reprod 21:429–435

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kling C, Wilke H, Schmutzler A et al (2007) Verlauf 2 Jahre nach wiederholtem Implantationsversagen im IVF-Programm. Geburtsh Frauenheilkd 67:1002–1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Laird SM, Tuckerman EM, Li TC (2006) Cytokine expression in the endometrium of women with implantation failure and recurrent miscarriage. Reprod Biomed Online 13:13–23

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Margalioth EJ, Ben-Chetrit A, Gal M et al (2006) Investigation and treatment of repeated implantation failure following IVF-ET. Hum Reprod 21:3036–3043

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Matteo MG, Greco P, Rosenberg P et al (2007) Normal percentage of CD56 bright natural killer cells in young patients with a history of repeated unexplained implantation failure after in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril 88:990–993

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Medawar PD (1953) Some immunological and endocrinological problems raised by the evolution of viviparity in vertebrates. Symposium of the Society of Experimental Biology, No. VII Evolution, Cambridge University Press, pp 320–338

  21. Parham P (2004) NK cells and trophoblasts: partners in pregnancy. J Exp Med 200:951–955

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Quenby S, Farquharson R (2006) Uterine natural killer cells, implantation failure and recurrent miscarriage. Reprod Biomed Online 13:24–28

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Quenby S, Nick H, Innes B et al (2009) Uterine natural killer cells and angiogenesis in recurrent reproductive failure. Hum Reprod 24:45–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rai R (2007) Should immunotherapy be used in RPL? – Against. In: Carp HJA (ed) Recurrent pregnancy loss. Causes, controversis and treatment. Informa Healthcare, London, pp 189–192

  25. Sewell WAC, Joltes S (2002) Immunomodulatory action of intravenous immunoglobulins. Immunology 107:387–393

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Shakhar K, Rosenne E, Loewenthal R et al (2006) High NK cell activity in recurrent miscarriage: what are we really measuring? Hum Reprod 21:2421–2425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Stephenson MD, Fluker MR (2000) Treatment of repeated unexplained in vitro fertilization failure with intravenous immunoglobulin: a randomized placebo-controlled Canadian trial. Fertil Steril 74:1108–1113

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Stray-Pedersen B, Stray-Pedersen S (1984) Etiologic factors and subsequent reproductive performance in 195 couples with a prior history of habitual abortion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 148:140–146

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ubaldi F, Rienzi L, Ferrero S et al (2002) Low dose prednisolone administration in routine ICSI patients does not improve pregnancy and implantation rates. Hum Reprod 17:1544–1547

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Urman B, Yakin K, Balaban B (2005) Recurrent implantation failure in assisted reproduction: how to counsel and manage. B. Treatment options that have not been proven to benefit the couple. Reprod Biomed Online 11:382–391

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wegmann TG, Lin H, Guilbert L et al (1993) Bidirectional cytokine interactions in the maternal–fetal relationship: is successful pregnancy a TH2 phenomenon? Immunol Today 14:353–356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Würfel W, Fiedler K, Krüsmann G et al (2006) Verbesserung der Behandlungsergebnisse durch LeukoNorm Cytochemia bei Patientinnen mit mehrfachen frustranen IVF- oder ICSI- Behandlungszyklen. Zentralbl Gynäkol 123:361–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Kleinstein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kleinstein, J. Aktive und passive Immunisierung. Gynäkologische Endokrinologie 7, 87–92 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10304-008-0296-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10304-008-0296-z

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation