Skip to main content
Log in

Évaluation de risques des événements indésirables liés à l’usage des plantes médicinales chez les enfants atteints de maladies hématologiques et cancéreuses

Assessment of risk of adverse events associated with the use of herbal medicines in children with hematological diseases and cancer

  • Article de Synthèse
  • Published:
Phytothérapie

Résumé

Pour évaluer la prévalence des événements indésirables (EI) liés à l’utilisation des plantes médicinales (PM) et inventorier les PM les plus utilisées chez les enfants (moins de 16 ans) atteints de maladies hématologiques et cancéreuses, nous avons mené une étude auprès de 404 patients (ou de leurs tuteurs) pendant quatre mois au Centre d’Hématologie-Oncologie Pédiatrique (CHOP) de Rabat. Cette étude a été réalisée à l’aide d’un questionnaire de 10 items et avec l’objectif de collecter le maximum d’informations concernant le patient et les PM utilisées dans les maladies hématologiques et cancéreuses. Cette enquête a montré que 14,9% des patients ont eu recours à l’usage des PM, tous ceux qui ont utilisé les PM ne divulguent pas l’information à leur médecin traitant, avec un sex-ratio de 1,4. Parmi les patients interrogés, utilisant les PM, on note que 9,4% ont présenté des EI. L’analyse des résultats a montré que la néphrite tubulointerstitielle représente l’IE le plus fréquent (3,2%), suivie par la toux et le rhume (0,5%), la diarrhée (0,2%) et les vomissements (0,2%). Ces résultats ont montré que l’évolution est favorable dans 5 % des cas. Parmi les PM utilisées par les patients, certaines sont incriminées dans l’apparition des EI, telles Nigella sativa L. (5%) et Aristolochia longa L. (2,3%). Le recours aux plantes médicinales en tant que alternative médicale au CHOP représente une issue incontournable pour la majorité des patients, les PMsont utilisées en première intention dans 3,9% des cas, en concomitance avec les traitements médicamenteux dans 85%des cas et en complément au terme de la thérapeutique médicale dans 11,1%. L’intérêt de la sensibilisation de familles des patients et des oncologues aux risques des EI liés à l’usage des PM reste primordial pour une prise en charge optimale des patients.

Abstract

To better assess the prevalence of adverse events (AEs) related to the use of medicinal plants (PM) and inventory the most used in children PM (under 16 years) with hematological diseases and cancer, we conducted a study with 404 patients (or their guardians) for four months at the Pediatric Hematology -Oncology Centre (CHOP) in Rabat. This study was performed using a 10-item questionnaire through which we aim to gather as much information as possible on patients and PM used in hematological diseases and cancer. The survey showed that 14.9% of patients have resorted to the use of PM, all those who have used the PM does not disclose the information to their physician, with a sex ratio of 1.4. Among interviewed patients, using PM, we note that 9.4% had AEs. Analysis of the results showed that tubulo-interstitial nephritis is the most common IE (3.2%), followed by cough and cold (0.5%), diarrhea (0.2 %) and vomiting (0.2%). These results showed that the outcome is favorable in 5% cases. Among the PM used by patients, some of them are involved in adverse reactions, Nigella sativa L. in 5% and Aristolochia longa L. in 2.3%. The resort to medicinal plants as an alternative is a major issue for most of patients, herbals are used in first line in 3.9% of the cases, concomitantly in 85% and as a complementary at the end of the medical therapeutic in 11.1%. The sensitization of patients, families and physicians is of a major importance for an optimal management of patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Références

  1. Vargas-Murga L, Garcia-Alvarez A, Roman-Viñas B, et al (2011) Plant food supplement (PFS) market structure in EC Member States, methods and techniques for the assessment of individual PFS intake. Food Funct 2(12):731–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fasinu P, Orisakwe OE (2013) Heavy metal pollution in sub-Saharan Africa and possible implications in cancer epidemiology. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 14(6):3393–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Parkin DM (2000) Le cancer dans les pays tropicaux. Carcinol Prat Afr 3:24–31

    Google Scholar 

  4. Teinturier C, Kalifa C, Hartmann O, et al (1992) Tumeurs solides malignes néonatales à propos de 75 cas. Arch Fr Pédiatr 49: 187–192

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Philip T, Frappaz D (1993) Cancers de l’enfant (Monographie). Rev Prat 43:2173–5

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ward E, Desantis C, Robbins A, et al (2014) Childhood and adolescent cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 64:83–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dulioust J, Pépin P, Grémy I (2008) Ile-de-France épidémiologie des cancers chez l’enfant de moins de 15 ans. Adsp n° 61/62 décembre 2007—mars 2008 p.99

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hessissen L, Madani A (2012) Pediatric oncology in Morocco: achievements and challenges. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol (34) 21–2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Errihani H, Mrabti H, Boutayeb S, et al (2008) Impact of cancer on Moslem patients in Morocco. Psycho-Oncology 17(1):98–100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gözüm S, Arikan D, Büyükavci M (2007) Complementary and alternative medicine use in pediatric oncology patients in eastern Turkey. Cancer Nurs 30(1):38–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ali AZ, Younes L, Yassir B (2013) Enquête sur les aspects toxicologiques de la phytothérapie utilisée par un herboriste à Fès, Maroc. Pan Afr Med J 14:125

    Google Scholar 

  12. Martel D, Bussières JF, Théorêt Y, et al (2005) Use of alternative and complementary therapies in children with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 44(7):660–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hedderson MM, Patterson RE, Neuhouser ML, et al (2004) Sex differences in motives for use of complementary and alternative medicine among cancer patients. Altern Ther Health Med 10 (5):58–64

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Post-White J, Hawks RG (2005) Complementary and alternative medicine in pediatric oncology. Semin Oncol Nurs 21(2):107–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Duleba K, Wysocki M, Styczynski J (2008) Physicians attitudes towards complementary and alternative medicine in patients with cancer: preliminary report from pediatric and oncology centers. Med Wieku Rozwoj 12(4 Pt 2):1148–54

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Karali Y, Demirkaya M, Sevinir B (2012) Use of complementary and alternative medicine in children with cancer: effect on survival. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 29(4):335–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Quimby EL (2007) The use of herbal therapies in pediatric oncology patients: treating symptoms of cancer and side effects of standard therapies J Pediatr Oncol Nurs 24(1):35–40

    Google Scholar 

  18. El-Aziz MA, Hassan HA, Mohamed MH, et al (2005) The biochemical and morphological alterations following administration of melatonin, retinoic acid and Nigella sativa in mammary carcinoma: an animal model. Int J Exp Pathol 86(6):383–96

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Skalli S, Soulaymani RB (2012) Safety Monitoring of Herb-Drug Interactions: A Component of Pharmacovigilance. Drug Saf 35 (10):785–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vickers KA, Jolly KB, Greenfield SM (2006) Herbal medicine: women’s views, knowledge and interaction with doctors: a qualitative study. BMC Compl Alt Med 6:40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gomez-Martinez R, Tlacuilo-Parra A, Garibaldi-Covarrubias R (2007) Use of complementary and alternative medicine in children with cancer in Occidental, Mexico. Pediatr Blood Cancer 49(6):820–3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mc Curdy EA, Spangler JG, Wofford MM, et al (2003) Religiosity is associated with the use of complementary medical therapies by pediatric oncology patients. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 25 (2):125–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Roth M, Lin J, Kim M, Moody K (2009) Pediatric oncologists’ views toward the use of complementary and alternative medicine in children with cancer. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 31(3):177–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stewart MJ, Steenkamp V, van der Merwe S, et al (2002) The cytotoxic effects of a traditional Zulu remedy, impila (Callilepis laureola). Hum Exp Toxicol 21(12):643–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. White P (1998) Complementary medicine treatment of cancer, a survey of provision. Compl Ther Med 6:10–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Spigelblatt L, Laine-Ammara G, Pless IB, Guyver A (1994) The use of alternative medicine by children. Pediatric 94:811–4

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tazi I, Nafil H, Mahmal L, et al (2013) [Complementary medicine in cancer patients under treatment in Marrakech, Morocco: a prospective study]. Bull Soc Pathol Exot 106(4)278–85

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Van Hunsel FP, Van Grootheest AC (2013) Adverse reactions to herbal remedies: analysis of reported adverse reactions in the Netherlands. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 157(47) A6615

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hausner E, Fiszman ML, Hanig J, et al (2008) Long-term consequences of drugs on the paediatric cardiovascular system. Drug Saf 31(12):1083–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gill SK, Rieder MJ (2008) Toxicity of a traditional Chinese medicine, Ganoderma lucidum, in children with cancer. Can J Clin Pharmacol 15(2):275–85

    Google Scholar 

  31. Musa AA, Ogun SA, Agboola AO, et al (2007) Surgical complications from local herbal practitioners: report of five cases. East Afr Med J 84(5):240–5

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ali-Shtayeh MS, Jamous RM, Jamous RM (2011) Herbal preparation use by patients suffering from cancer in Palestine, Complement Ther Clin Pract 17(4):235–40

    Google Scholar 

  33. Fernandez CV, Stutzer CA, Mac William L, Fryer CJ (1998) Alternative and complementary therapy use in pediatric oncology patients in British Columbia: prevalence and reasons for use and nonuse. Clin Oncol 16(4):1279–86

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Alternatif-bien-être (2010) L’huile de nigelle prometteuse selon deux études, contre certains cancers agressifs (72) 16–7

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hussain H, Hussain J, Al-Harrasi A (2012) Green IR. Chemistry and biology of the genus Voacanga. Pharm Biol 50(9):1183–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhilenko VV, Zalietok SP, Klenov OO (2012) [Effect of fenugreek on the growth of different genesis tumors] Lik Sprava (5):133–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Soares J, Keppler BR, Wang X, et al (2011) Ortho-Quinone tanshinones directly inhibit telomerase through an oxidative mechanism mediated by hydrogen peroxide. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 15;21(24):7474–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Kelloff GJ, Boone CW, Steele VE, et al (1995) Inhibition of chemical carcinogenesis. In: Arcos JC, Argus MF, Woo Y, editors. Chemical Induction of Cancer. Boston: Birkhauser 73–122

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Merfort I, Wray V, Barakat HH, et al (1997) flavonol triglycosides from seeds of Nigella sativa. Phytochemistry 46:359–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Kim YA, Kim H, Seo Y (2013) Antiproliferative effect of flavonoids from the halophyte Vitex rotundifolia on human cancer cells. Nat Prod Commun 8(10):1405–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lo YL, Huang JD (1999) Comparison of effects of natural or artificial rodent diet on etoposide absorption in rats. In Vivo (13) 51–5

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Li X, Yun JK, J Choi JS (2007) Effects of morin on the pharmacokinetics of etoposide in rats. Biopharm Drug Dispos (28)151–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Haidar C, Jeha S (2011) Drug interactions in childhood cancer. Lancet Oncol 12(1):92–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Encouse BG, Philip YL (2009) Green tea polyphenols block the anticancer effects of bortezomib and other boronic acid—based proteasome inhibitors. Blood 113 (23)5927–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Williamson EM (2005) Interactions between herbal and conventional medicines. Expert Opin Drug Saf 4(2):355–78

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ernst E (1998) Harmless Herbs? A review of the recent literature. Am J of Med 104:170–8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Yu SM, Ghandour RM, Huang ZJ (2004) Herbal supplement use among US women, 2000. J Am Med Womens Assoc 59 (1):17–24

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Chebat.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chebat, A., Skalli, S., Benkirane, R. et al. Évaluation de risques des événements indésirables liés à l’usage des plantes médicinales chez les enfants atteints de maladies hématologiques et cancéreuses. Phytothérapie 13, 176–184 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10298-014-0912-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10298-014-0912-4

Mots clés

Keywords

Navigation