Skip to main content
Log in

Étude par CPG-SM d’allergènes volatils dans les fragrances et autres ingrédients destinés à la cosmétique

GC-MS study of volatile allergens in fragrances and other ingredients meant for cosmetics

  • Article Original
  • Toxicologie
  • Published:
Phytothérapie

Résumé

L’allergie cutanée se présente principalement comme le résultat de l’utilisation de produits domestiques et cosmétiques. Quelques fragrances, présentes dans ces produits, peuvent contenir des composés qui sont responsables de cette allergie. La Commission européenne a pris une directive limitant la teneur de 26 allergènes présents dans les produits cosmétiques. La technique de CPG-SM a été utilisée pour identifier 24 allergènes volatils, pour déterminer les limites de détection et de quantification et pour réaliser la calibration avec des solutions étalons de chaque allergène. Un plan d’expérience (Nemrod-W) a été utilisé pour déterminer les paramètres optimaux de la technique de CPG (colonne DB5-MS, 30 m, 0,25 mm d.i., 0,25 μm film; 50 °C (une minute), vitesse de chauffage à 3 °C/min jusqu’à 150 °C, puis 6 °C/min jusqu’à 235 °C, hélium 1,70 ml/min). Pour une bonne résolution entre les pics allergènes et leurs isomères, la durée de l’essai est inférieure à 50 minutes. L’intérêt de cette méthode est que même si beaucoup de terpénoïdes différents sont présents avec les allergènes dans les fragrances et dans les ingrédients destinés à la cosmétique, l’identification sera faite facilement grâce à l’utilisation des temps de rétention et des spectres de masse. La quantification est faîte par les modes SCAN ou SIM.

Abstract

Cutaneous allergy occurs mainly as a result of the use of domestic products and cosmetics. Some fragrances present in these products may contain compounds that are responsible for allergy (allergens). The European Council has issued a directive limiting the level of 26 allergens found in cosmetics. The GC-MS technique was used to identify 24 volatile allergens, determine detection and quantification limits and make calibration with the standard solutions of each allergen. An experimental design (Nemrod-W) was used to determine the optimal parameters of GC technique (DB5-MS column, 30 m, 0.25 mm i.d., 0.25 μm film; 50 °C (1 min), rate 1 at 3 °C/min until 150 °C, then rate 2 at 6 °C/min until 235 °C, helium 1.70 ml/min). A run of less than 50 min could be used with good resolution between allergens and their isomers. The interest of this method is that even if many various terpenoïds are present with allergens in fragrances and ingredients meant for cosmetics, the identification will be done easily with the use of retention times and mass spectra. The quantitation will be done in SCAN or SIM mode.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Bibliographie

  1. Basserau M, Chaintreau A, Duperrex S, et al. (2007) GC-MS quantitation of suspected volatile allergens in Fragrances. 2. Data treatment strategies and method performances. J Agric Food Chem 55: 25–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chaintreau A, Joulain D, Marin C, et al. (2003) GC-MS quantitation of fragrances compounds suspected to cause skin reactions. 1. J Agric Food Chem 51: 6398–6403

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cordero C, Bicchi C, Joulain D, et al. (2007) Identification, quantitation and method validation for the analysis of suspected allergens in fragrances by comprehensive two-dimensional GC coupled with quadrupole MS and FID. J Chromatogr A 1150: 37–49

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. De Groot AC, Bruynzeel DP, Bos JD et al. (1988) The allergens in cosmetics. Arch Dermatol 124: 1525–1529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Debonneville C, Chaintreau A (2004) Quantitation of suspected allergens in fragrances. part 2. Evaluation of comprehensive GC-conventional MS. J Chromatogr A 1027: 109–115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Directive 2003/15/CE of European Parliament and Council relating to cosmetic products of 27 February 2003, Official Journal of the European Union of 11.03.2003, L 66/26-35

  7. Dunn MS, Vulic N, Shellie RA, et al. (2006) Targeted multidimensional GC for the quantitative analysis of suspected allergens in fragrance products. J Chromatogr A 1130: 122–129

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ellendt K, Hempel G, Köbler H (2001) Analysis of sensitizing fragrances by GC-MS. SÖFW-Journal 127: 29–34

    Google Scholar 

  9. Frosch PJ, Pilz B, Andersen KE, et al. (1995) Patch testing with fragrances. Contact Dermatitis 33: 333–342

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gimenez-Arnau A, Gimenez-Arnau E, Serra-Baldrich E, et al. (2002) Principles and methodology for identification of fragrance allergen in consumer products. Contact Dermatitis 47: 345–352

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Heydorn S, Menne T, Johansen JD (2003) Fragrance allergy and hand eczema — a review. Contact Dermatitis 48: 59–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaloustian J, Mikaïl C, El-Moselhy T, et al. (2007) GC-MS analysis of allergens in plant oils meant to cosmetics. OCL (oleagineux-corps gras-lipides) 14: 110–115

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaloustian J, Pauli AM, Pastor J (2000) Evolution of camphor and others components in the essential oils of two labiate species during the biological cycle. Analusis 28: 308–315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Katz AS, Sherertz EF (1999) Facial dermatitis: patch test results and final diagnose. Am J Contact Dermat 10: 153–156

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Larsen W, Nakayama H, Fischer T, et al. (2001) Fragrance contact dermatitis: a worldwide multicenter investigation (part 2). Contact Dermatitis 44: 344–346

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Larsen W, Nakayama H, Lindberg M, et al. (1996) Fragrance contact dermatitis: a worldwide multicenter investigation (part 1). Am J Contact Dermat 7: 77–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Leijs H, Broekhans J, Van Pelt L, et al. (2005) Quantitative analysis of the 26 allergens for cosmetic labelling in fragrance raw materials and perfume oils. J Agric Food Chem 53: 5487–5491

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lunder T, Kansky A (2000) Increase in contact allergy to fragrance patch-test results 1989–1998. Contact Dermatitis 43: 107–109

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mathieu D, Nony J, Phan-Tan-Luu R (2000) Nemrod-W LPRAI, Marseille, France www.nemrodw.com

  20. Niederer M, Bollhalder R, Hohl C (2006) Determination of fragrance allergens in cosmetics by size-exclusion chromatography followed by GC-MS. J Chromatogr A 1132: 109–116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rastogi SC (1995) Analysis of fragrances in cosmetics by GC-MS. J High Res Chromatogr 18: 653–658

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rastogi SC, Heydorn S, Johansen JD, et al. (2001) Fragrance chemicals in domestic and occupational products. Contact Dermatitis 45: 221–225

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rastogi SC, Johansen JD, Frosch P, et al. (1998) Deodorants on the European market: quantitative chemical analysis of 21 fragrances. Contact Dermatitis 38: 29–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rastogi SC, Johansen JD, Menne T, et al. (1999) Contents of fragrance allergens in children’s cosmetics and cosmetic-toys. Contact Dermatitis 41: 84–88

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rastogi SC, Lepoittevin JP, Johansen JD, et al. (1998) Fragrances and other materials in deodorants. Contact Dermatitis 39: 293–303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Scheinman PL (1996) Allergic contact dermatitis to fragrance: a review. Am J Contact Dermatis 7: 65–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Shellie R, Marriott P, Chaintreau A (2004) Quantitation of suspected allergens in fragrances (part 1): evaluation of comprehensive two-dimensional GC for quality control. Flavour Fragr J 19: 91–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Villa C, Gambaro R, Mariani E, et al. (2007) HPLC method for the simultaneous determination of 24 fragrance allergens to study scented products. J Pharm Biomed Analysis 44: 755–762

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Kaloustian.

About this article

Cite this article

Fattarsi, K., Mikail, C., Abou, L. et al. Étude par CPG-SM d’allergènes volatils dans les fragrances et autres ingrédients destinés à la cosmétique. Phytothérapie 9, 126–135 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10298-011-0624-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10298-011-0624-7

Mots clés

Keywords

Navigation