Differences of methanogenesis between mesophilic and thermophilic in situ biogas-upgrading systems by hydrogen addition
- 74 Downloads
To investigate the differences in microbial community structure between mesophilic and thermophilic in situ biogas-upgrading systems by H2 addition, two reactors (35 °C and 55 °C) were run for four stages according to different H2 addition rates (H2/CO2 of 0:1, 1:1, and 4:1) and mixing mode (intermittent and continuous). 16S rRNA gene-sequencing technology was applied to analyze microbial community structure. The results showed that the temperature is a crucial factor in impacting succession of microbial community structure and the H2 utilization pathway. For mesophilic digestion, most of added H2 was consumed indirectly by the combination of homoacetogens and strict aceticlastic methanogens. In the thermophilic system, most of added H2 may be used for microbial cell growth, and part of H2 was utilized directly by strict hydrogenotrophic methanogens and facultative aceticlastic methanogens. Continuous stirring was harmful to the stabilization of mesophilic system, but not to the thermophilic one.
KeywordsIn situ biogas upgrading Homoacetogens Strict aceticlastic methanogens Hydrogenotrophic methanogens Syntrophic acetate-oxidizing bacteria
The data were analyzed on the free online platform of Majorbio I-Sanger Cloud Platform (www.i-sanger.com).
This research was supported jointly by the National Key R & D Program of China (2018YFD0501405), West Light Foundation of Chinese Academy of Sciences (2018XBZG_XBQNXZ_A_004), Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS (2017423), Special fund for talented persons of Sichuan provincial Party Committee Organization Department, Key projects for foreign cooperation of International Cooperation Bureau of Chinese Academy of Sciences (182344KYSB20170009), Science and Technology Service Network Initiative (STS) of CAS (KFJ-STS-QYZD-117).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
- 25.Pap B, Györkei Á, Boboescu IZ, Nagy IK, Bíró T, Kondorosi É, Maróti G (2015) Temperature-dependent transformation of biogas-producing microbial communities points to the increased importance of hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis under thermophilic operation. Bioresour Technol 177:375–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.11.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Shigematsu T, Tang Y, Kobayashi T, Kawaguchi H, Morimura S, Kida K (2004) Effect of dilution rate on metabolic pathway shift between aceticlastic and nonaceticlastic methanogenesis in chemostat cultivation. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:4048. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.70.7.4048-4052.2004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Wang LH, Wang QH, Cai WW, Sun XH (2012) Influence of mixing proportion on the solid-state anaerobic co-digestion of distiller’s grains and food waste. Biosyst Eng 112:130–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2012.03.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Yang Z, Guo R, Shi X, He S, Wang L, Dai M, Qiu Y, Dang X (2016) Bioaugmentation of Hydrogenispora ethanolica LX-B affects hydrogen production through altering indigenous bacterial community structure. Bioresour Technol 211:319–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.097 CrossRefGoogle Scholar