Advertisement

Enhanced plasmid-mediated bioaugmentation of RDX-contaminated matrices in column studies using donor strain Gordonia sp. KTR9

  • Carina M. JungEmail author
  • Matthew Carr
  • G. Alon Blakeney
  • Karl J. IndestEmail author
Environmental Microbiology - Original Paper
  • 73 Downloads

Abstract

Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) is the lateral movement of genetic material between organisms. The RDX explosive-degrading bacterium Gordonia sp. KTR9 has been shown previously to transfer the pGKT2 plasmid containing the RDX degradative genes (xplAB) by HGT. Overall, fitness costs to the transconjugants to maintain pGKT2 was determined through growth and survivability assessments. Rhodococcus jostii RHA1 transconjugants demonstrated a fitness cost while other strains showed minimal cost. Biogeochemical parameters that stimulate HGT of pGKT2 were evaluated in soil slurry mating experiments and the absence of nitrogen was found to increase HGT events three orders of magnitude. Experiments evaluating RDX degradation in flow-through soil columns containing mating pairs showed 20% greater degradation than columns with only the donor KTR9 strain. Understanding the factors governing HGT will benefit bioaugmentation efforts where beneficial bacteria with transferrable traits could be used to more efficiently degrade contaminants through gene transfer to native populations.

Keywords

Horizontal gene transfer HGT RDX Genetic bioaugmentation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was funded through the US Army Corps of Engineers’ Environmental Quality Program. Views, opinions and/or findings contained herein are those of the authors and should not be construed as an Official Department of the Army position or decision unless so designated by other official documentation. The authors would like to thank Mrs. Cynthia Price for the use of peristaltic pumps and columns and for her scientific advice.

Supplementary material

10295_2019_2185_MOESM1_ESM.docx (24 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 23 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Aspray TA, Hansen SK, Burns RG (2005) A soil-based microbial biofilm exposed to 2,4-D: bacterial community development and establishment of conjugative plasmid pJP4. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 54:317–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baltrus D (2013) Exploring the costs of horizontal gene transfer. Trends Ecol Evol 28:489–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beane NR, VanZomeran CM, Price CL, Seiter-Moser JM, Conkle JL, Stevens BN, Berkowitz JF (eds) (2017) Integrated assessment of vegetation and soil conditions following herbicide application. In: ERDC Technical Report, vol ERDC/EL TR-17-9. Engineer Research and Development CenterGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brophy JAN, Triassi AJ, Adams BL, Renberg RL, Stratis-Cullum DN, Grossman AD, Voigt CA (2018) Engineered integrative and conjugative elements for efficient and inducible DNA transfer to undomesticated bacteria. Nat Microbiol 3:1043–1053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carroll AC, Wong A (2018) Plasmid persistence: costs, benefits, and the plasmid paradox. Can J Microbiol 64:293–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Christensen BB, Sternberg C, Andersen JB, Eberl L, Moller S, Givskov M, Molin S (1998) Establishment of new genetic traits in a microbial biofilm community. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:2247–2255Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Crocker F, Indest KJ, Jung CM, Hancock DE, Merritt MM, Florizone C, Chen H-P, Stewart GR, Zhu S, Sukdeo N, Fortin M-C, Hallam SJ, Mohn WW, Eltis LD, Perreault NN, Zhao J-S, Paquet L, Halasz A, Hawari J (eds) (2012) Identification of microbial gene biomarkers for in situ RDX biodegradation. In: Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program; Project ER-1609. ERDC Technical Report, vol ERDC/EL TR-12-33Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Crocker FH, Indest KJ, Jung CM, Hancock DE, Fuller ME, Hatzinger PB, Vainberg S, Istok JD, Wilson E, Michalsen MM (2015) Evaluation of microbial transport during aerobic bioaugmentation of an RDX-contaminated aquifer. Biodegradation 26:443–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Crocker FH, Thompson KT, Szecsody JE, Fredrickson HL (2005) Biotic and abiotic degradation of CL-20 and RDX in soils. J Environ Qual 34:2208–2216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    De Gelder L, Vandecasteele FPJ, Brown CJ, Forney LJ, Top EM (2005) Plasmid donor affects host range of promiscuous IncP-1b plasmid pB10 in an activated-sludge microbial community. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:5309–5317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dejonghe W, Goris J, El Fantroussi S, Hofte M, De Vos P, Verstraete W, Top EM (2000) Effect of dissemination of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) degradation plasmids on 2,4-d degradation and on bacterial community structure in two different soil horizons. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:3297–3304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dionisio F, Conceicao I, Marques A, Fernandes L, Gordo I (2005) The evolution of a conjugative plasmid and its ability to increase bacterial fitness. Biol Lett 1:250–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ellis DE, Lutz EJ, Odom JM, Buchanan RJ, Bartlett CL, Lee MD, Harkness MR, DeWeerd KA (2000) Bioaugmentation for accelerated in situ anaerobic bioremediation. Environ Sci Technol 34:2254–2260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fuller M, Hatzinger P, Condee C, Andaya C, Michalsen M, Crocker F, Indest K, Jung C, Hancock D, Istok J (2015) Laboratory evaluation of bioaugmentation for aerobic treatment of RDX in groundwater. Biodegradation 2:77–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fuller ME, Hatzinger PB, Condee CW, Andaya C, Vainberg S, Michalsen MM, Crocker FH, Indest KJ, Jung CM, Eaton H, Istok JD (2015) Laboratory evaluation of bioaugmentation for aerobic treatment of RDX in groundwater. Biodegradation 26:77–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Garbisu C, Garaiyurrebaso O, Epelde L, Grohmann E, Alkorta I (2017) Plasmid-mediated bioaugmentation for the bioremediation of contaminated soils. Front Microbiol 8:1966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ikuma K, Gunsch C (2012) Genetic bioaugmentation as an effective method for in situ bioremediation: functionality of catabolic plasmids following conjugal transfers. Bioengineered 3:234–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ikuma K, Holzem R, Gunsch C (2012) Impacts of organic carbon availability and recipient bacteria characteristics on the potential for TOL plasmid genetic bioaugmentation in soil slurries. Chemosphere 89:158–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Indest KJ, Hancock D, Jung CM, Eberly JO, Mohn WW, Eltis LD, Crocker FH (2013) Role of nitrogen limitation in transformation of RDX (hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine) by Gordonia sp. strain KTR9. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:1746–1750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Indest KJ, Jung CM, Chen HP, Hancock D, Florizone C, Eltis LD, Crocker FH (2010) Functional characterization of pGKT2, a 182 kb plasmid containing the xplAB genes involved in the degradation of RDX by Gordonia sp. KTR9. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:6329–6337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jung CM, Crocker FH, Eberly JO, Indest KJ (2011) Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) as a mechanism of dissemination of RDX-degrading activity among Actinomycete bacteria. J Appl Microbiol 110:1449–1459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lendvay JM, Löffler FE, Dollhopf M, Aiello MR, Daniels G, Fathepure BZ, Gebhard M, Heine R, Helton R, Shi J, Krajmalnik-Brown R, Major CL, Barcelona MJ, Petrovskis E, Hickey R, Tiedje JM, Adriaens P (2003) Bioreactive barriers: a comparison of bioaugmentation and biostimulation for chlorinated solvent remediation. Environ Sci Technol 37:1422–1431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Michalsen MM, King AS, Rule RA, Fuller ME, Hatzinger PB, Condee CW, Crocker FH, Indest KJ, Jung CM, Istok JD (2016) Evaluation of biostimulation and bioaugmentation to stimulate hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5,-triazine degradation in an aerobic groundwater aquifer. Environ Sci Technol 50:7625–7632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mølbeck L, Søren M, Kroer N (2007) Root growth and exudate production define the frequency of horizontal plasmid transfer in the rhizosphere. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 59:167–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Musovic S, Dechesne A, Sorensen J, Smets BF (2010) A novel assay to assess permissiveness of a soil microbial community toward receipt of mobile genetic elements. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:4813–4818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nielsen KM, Bøhn T, Townsend JP (2014) Detecting rare transfer events in bacterial populations. Front Microbiol 4:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pope C, McHugh T, Gillespie S (2010) Methods to determine fitness in bacteria. In: McHugh SGaT (ed) Methods in molecular biology, vol 642, antibiotic resistance protocols, 2nd edn. Springer Science, Berlin, pp 113–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ren C, Wang Y, Tian L, Chen M, Sun J, Li L (2018) Genetic bioaugmentation of activated sludge with dioxin-catabolic plasmids harbored by Rhodococcus sp. strain p52. Environ Sci Technol 52:5339–5348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rösch T, Golman W, Hucklesby L, Gonzalez-Pastor J, Graumann P (2014) The presence of conjugative plasmid pLS20 affects global transcription of its Bacillis subtilis host and confers beneficial stress resistance to cells. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:1349–1358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rylott E, Budarina MV, Barker A, Lorenz A, Strand S, Bruce CN (2011) Engineering plants for the phytoremediation of RDX in the presence of the co-contaminating explosive TNT. New Phytol 192:405–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rylott EL, Bruce NC (2008) Plants disarm soil: engineering plants for the phytoremediation of explosives. Trends Biotechnol 27:73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    San Millan A, Maclean RC (2017) Fitness costs of plasmids: a limit to plasmid transmission. In: Microbiol Spectrum 5:MTBP-0016-2017Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Seoane J, Yankelvich T, Dechesne A, Merkey B, Sternberg C, Smets BF (2011) An individual-based approach to explain plasmid invasion in bacterial population. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 75:17–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shintani M, Takahashi Y, Tokumaru H, Kadota K, Hara H, Miyakoshi M, Naito K, Yamane H, Nishida H, Nojiri H (2010) Response of the Pseudomonas host chromosomal transcriptome to carriage of the IncP-7 plasmid pCAR1. Environ Microbiol 12:1413–1426Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sorensen SJ, Bailey M, Hansen LH, Kroer N, Wuertz S (2005) Studying plasmid horizontal transfer in situ: a critical review. Nat Rev Microbiol 3:700–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Suja F, Rahim F, Taha MR, Hambali N, Rizal Razali M, Khalid A, Hamzah A (2014) Effects of local microbial bioaugmentation and biostimulation on the bioremediation of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) in crude oil contaminated soil based on laboratory and field observations. Int Biodeter Biodegr 90:115–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sun J, Qiu Y, Ding P, Peng P, Yang H, Li L (2017) Conjugative transfer of dioxin–catabolic megaplasmids and bioaugmentation prospects of a Rhodococcus sp. Environ Sci Technol 51:6298–6307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Top EM, Springael D, Boon N (2002) Catabolic mobile genetic elements and their potential use in bioaugmentation of polluted soils and waters. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 42:199–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Top EM, Van Daele P, De Saeyer N, Forney LJ (1998) Enhancement of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) degradation in soil by dissemination of catabolic plasmids. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 73:87–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wiedenbeck J, Cohan F (2011) Origins of bacterial diversity through horizontal genetic transfer and adaptation to new ecological niches. FEMS Microbiol Rev 35:957–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wu M, Dick WA, Li W, Wang X, Yang Q, Wang T, Xu L, Zhang M, Chen L (2016) Bioaugmentation and biostimulation of hydrocarbon degradation and the microbial community in a petroleum-contaminated soil. Int Biodeter Biodegr 107:158–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zhang L, Routsong R, Nguyen Q, Rylott EL, Bruce NC, Strand SE (2017) Expression in grasses of multiple transgenes for degradation of munitions compounds on live-fire training ranges. Plant Biotechnol J 15:624–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Environmental LaboratoryUS Army Engineer Research and Development CenterVicksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations