Skip to main content

Molecular approach for the rapid detection of Bacillus and Pseudomonas genera—dominant antagonistic groups—from diverse ecological niches using colony multiplex PCR

Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology volume 41, pages 1085–1097 (2014)Cite this article

Abstract

Bacillus and Pseudomonas are the dominant groups of bacteria known for their antagonistic potential against many plant and animal pathogens. Presently, exploration of these genera with antagonistic property for disease management of aquaculture system is gaining more importance to overcome the use of antibiotics and related resistance issues. Rapid screening and identification of these genera from diverse bacterial populations by conventional methods is laborious, cost-intensive, and time-consuming. To overcome these limiting factors, in the present study, a colony multiplex PCR (cmPCR) method was developed and evaluated for the rapid detection of Bacillus and Pseudomonas. The technique amplifies the partial 16S rRNA gene of Bacillus and Pseudomonas with a product size of ~1,100 and ~375 bp, respectively, using single forward (BSF2) and two reverse primers (PAGSR and BK1R). Reliability of the cmPCR method was confirmed by screening 472 isolates obtained from ten different eco-stations, of which 133 isolates belonged to Bacillus and 32 to Pseudomonas. The cmPCR method also helped to identify six different Pseudomonas spp. and 14 different Bacillus spp. from environmental samples. Of the total 472 isolates studied, 46 showed antagonistic activity, among which 63 % were Bacillus and 17.4 % were Pseudomonas. Thus, the newly developed molecular approach provides a quick, sensitive, and potential screening tool to detect novel, antagonistically important Bacillus and Pseudomonas genera for their use in aquaculture. Further, it can also act as a taxonomic tool to understand the distribution of these genera from wide ecological niches and their exploitation for diverse biotechnological applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. Altinok I (2011) Multiplex PCR assay for detection of four major bacterial pathogens causing rainbow trout disease. Dis Aquat Organ 93(3):199–206

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215(3):403–410

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Balcazar JL, Rojas-Luna T (2007) Inhibitory activity of probiotic Bacillus subtilis UTM 126 against Vibrio species confers protection against vibriosis in juvenile shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). Curr Microbiol 55(5):409–412

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bobbie RJ, White DC (1980) Characterization of benthic microbial community structure by high-resolution gas chromatography of fatty acid methyl esters. Appl Environ Microbiol 39(6):1212–1222

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chamberlain JS, Chamberlain JR (1994) Optimization of multiplex PCRs. In: Mullis KB, Ferre F, Gibbs RA (eds) The polymerase chain reaction. Birkhauser, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen J, Tanq J, Liu J, Cai Z, Bai X (2012) Development and evaluation of a multiplex PCR for simultaneous detection of five food borne pathogens. J Appl Microbiol 112(4):823–830

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chiang YC, Yang CY, Li C, Ho YC, Lin CK, Tsen HY (2006) Identification of Bacillus spp., Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., Staphylococcus spp. and Vibrio spp. with 16S ribosomal DNA-based oligonucleotide array hybridization. Int J Food Microbiol 107(2):131–137

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cunningham CO (2002) Molecular diagnosis of fish and shellfish diseases: present status and potential use in disease control. Aquaculture 206:19–55

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. FAO (2012) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2012. Italy, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fan H, Wu Q, Kou X (2008) Co-detection of five species of water-borne bacteria by multiplex PCR. Life Sci J 5(4):47–54

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Garbeva P, Veen JA, Elsas JD (2004) Assessment of the diversity, and antagonism towards Rhizoctonia solani AG3, of Pseudomonas species in soil from different agricultural regimes. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 47(1):51–64

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gomez-Gil B, Roque A, Turnbull JF (2000) The use and selection of probiotic bacteria for use in the culture of larval aquatic organisms. Aquaculture 191:259–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment and editor program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl Acids Symp Ser 41:95–98

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hofmann MA, Brian DA (1991) Sequencing PCR DNA amplified directly from a bacterial colony. Biotechniques 11(1):30–31

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Janda JM, Abbott SL (2007) 16S rRNA gene sequencing for bacterial identification in the diagnostic laboratory: pluses, perils, and pitfalls. J Clin Microbiol 45(9):2761–2764

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kong P, Richardson PA, Hong C (2005) Direct colony PCR-SSCP for detection of multiple pythiaceous oomycetes in environmental samples. J Microbiol Methods 61(1):25–32

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Krieg NR, Holt JG (1984) Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kwon HS, Yang EH, Lee SH, Yeon SW, Kang BH, Kim TY (2005) Rapid identification of potentially probiotic Bifidobacterium species by multiplex PCR using species-specific primers based on the region extending from 16S rRNA through 23S rRNA. FEMS Microbiol Lett 250:55–62

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kwon G-H, Lee H-A, Park J-Y, Kim JS, Lim J, Park C-S, Kwon DY, Kim Y-S, Kim JH (2009) Development of a RAPD-PCR method for identification of Bacillus species isolated from Cheonggukjang. Int J Food Microbiol 129:282–287

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Logan NA, Berkeley RCW (1984) Identification of Bacillus strains using the API system. J Gen Microbiol 130(7):1871–1882

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Maeda Y, Shinohara H, Kiba A, Ohnishi K, Furuya N, Kawamura Y, Ezaki T, Vandamme P, Tsushima S, Hikichi Y (2006) Phylogenetic study and multiplex PCR-based detection of Burkholderia plantarii, Burkholderia glumae and Burkholderia gladioli using gyrB and rpoD sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56(Pt 5):1031–1038

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nair AV, Vijayan KK, Chakraborty K, Leo Antony M (2012) Diversity and characterization of antagonistic bacteria from tropical estuarine habitats of Cochin, India for fish health management. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 28(7):2581–2592

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nithya C, Pandian SK (2010) Isolation of heterotrophic bacteria from Palk Bay sediments showing heavy metal tolerance and antibiotic production. Microbiol Res 165(7):578–593

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Olive DM, Bean P (1999) Principles and applications of methods for DNA-based typing of microbial organisms. J Clin Microbiol 37(6):1661–1669

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ozdemir Z (2009) Development of a multiplex PCR assay for the simultaneous detection of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis, Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato and Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. vesicatoria using pure cultures. J Plant Pathol 91(2):495–497

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Perry L, Heard P, Kane M, Kim H, Savikhin S, Dominguez W, Applegate B (2007) Application of multiplex polymerase chain reaction to the detection of pathogens in food. J Rapid Methods Autom Microbiol 15(2):176–198

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sadeghi A, Mortazavi SA, Bahrami AR, Sadeghi B (2012) Design of multiplex PCR for simultaneous detection of rope-forming Bacillus strains in Iranian bread dough. J Sci Food Agric 92(13):2652–2656

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sambrook J, Russell DW (2001) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sharma S, Kaur M (2010) Antimicrobial activities of rhizobacterial strains of Pseudomonas and Bacillus strains isolated from rhizosphere soil of carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus cv. Sunrise). Indian J Microbiol 50:229–232

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Spilker T, Coenye T, Vandamme P, LiPuma JJ (2004) PCR-based assay for differentiation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from other Pseudomonas species recovered from cystic fibrosis patients. J Clin Microbiol 42(5):2074–2079

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Stackebrandt E, Goebel BM (1994) Taxonomic note: a place for DNA–DNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Bacteriol 44(4):846–849

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. van Zeijl CM, van de Kamp EH, Punt PJ, Selten GC, Hauer B, van Gorcom RF, van den Hondel CA (1998) An improved colony-PCR method for filamentous fungi for amplification of PCR-fragments of several kilobases. J Biotechnol 59(3):221–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Vaerewijck MJ, De Vos P, Lebbe L, Scheldeman P, Hoste B, Heyndrickx M (2001) Occurrence of Bacillus sporothermodurans and other aerobic spore-forming species in feed concentrate for dairy cattle. J Appl Microbiol 91(6):1074–1084

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Vijayan KK, Singh ISB, Jayaprakash NS, Alavandi SV, Pai SS, Preetha R, Rajan JJS, Santiago TC (2006) A brackish water of Pseudomonas PS-102, a potential antagonistic bacterium against pathogenic vibrios in penaeid and non-penaeid rearing systems. Aquaculture 251(2–4):192–200

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Vinoj G, Vaseeharan B, Jayaseelan BD, Rajakumaran P, Ravi C (2013) Inhibitory effects of Bacillus licheniformis (DAB1) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (DAP1) against Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolated from Fenneropenaeus indicus. Aquac Int. doi:10.1007/s10499-012-9617-2

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wan M, Rosenberg JN, Faruq J, Betenbaugh MJ, Xia J (2011) An improved colony PCR procedure for genetic screening of Chlorella and related microalgae. Biotechnol Lett 33(8):1615–1619

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ward AC (1992) Rapid analysis of yeast transformants using colony-PCR. Biotechniques 13(3):350

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wattiau P, Renard ME, Ledent P, Debois V, Blackman G, Agathos SN (2001) A PCR test to identify Bacillus subtilis and closely related species and its application to the monitoring of wastewater biotreatment. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 56(5–6):816–819

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wu X-Y, Walker MJ, Hornitzky M, Chin J (2006) Development of a group-specific PCR combined with ARDRA for the identification of Bacillus species of environmental significance. J Microbiol Methods 64:107–119

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zheng L, Han X, Chen H, Lin W, Yan X (2005) Marine bacteria associated with marine macroorganisms: the potential antimicrobial resources. Ann Microbiol 55(2):119–124

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) for funding the study through the Application of Microorganisms in Agriculture and Allied Sectors (AMAAS project). We also express our sincere gratitude to the Director, Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (CMFRI) for providing necessary facilities to carry out the research. The authors also thank Dr. Lijo John for his support and editorial input of this manuscript. All the authors have agreed to submit this manuscript to the “Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology”.

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Marine Biotechnology Division, Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (ICAR), Ernakulam North P.O, PB No: 1603, Kochi, 682018, Kerala, India

    Anusree V. Nair, M. A. Pradeep & K. K. Vijayan

Authors
  1. Anusree V. Nair
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. A. Pradeep
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K. K. Vijayan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. K. Vijayan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nair, A.V., Pradeep, M.A. & Vijayan, K.K. Molecular approach for the rapid detection of Bacillus and Pseudomonas genera—dominant antagonistic groups—from diverse ecological niches using colony multiplex PCR. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 41, 1085–1097 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-014-1441-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-014-1441-4

Keywords

  • Bacillus
  • Bacterial identification
  • Colony multiplex PCR
  • Pseudomonas
  • Taxonomical tool