Skip to main content
Log in

Heterogeneity and spatial distribution of bacterial background contamination in pulp and process water of a paper mill

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology

Abstract

Identifying the source and the distribution of bacterial contaminant communities in water circuits of industrial applications is critical even when the process may not show signs of acute biofouling. The endemic contamination of facilities can cause adverse effects on process runability but may be masked by the observed daily variability. The distribution of background communities of bacterial contaminants may therefore be critical in the development of new site-specific antifouling strategies. In a paper mill as one example for a full-scale production process, bacterial contaminants in process water and pulp suspensions were mapped using molecular fingerprints at representative locations throughout the plant. These ecological data were analyzed in the process–engineering context of pulp and water flow in the facilities. Dispersal limits within the plant environment led to the presence of distinct groups of contaminant communities in the primary units of the plant, despite high flows of water and paper pulp between units. In the paper machine circuit, community profiles were more homogeneous than in the other primary units. The variability between sampled communities in each primary unit was used to identify a possible point source of microbial contamination, in this case a storage silo for reused pulp. Part of the contamination problem in the paper mill is likely related to indirect effects of microbial activity under the local conditions in the silo rather than to the direct presence of accumulated microbial biomass.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andrade A, Gloria P, d’Angelo J, Perissotto D, Lima R (2007) Evaluation of white water reuse in the bleaching process for reducing fresh water consumption. Water Sci Technol 55:199–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bento FM, Gaylarde CC (2001) Biodeterioration of stored diesel oil: studies in Brazil. Int Biodeterg Biodegrad 47:107–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Blanco MA, Miranda R, Negro C, Garcia-Suarez C, Garcia-Prol M, Sanchez A (2007) Full characterization of stickies in a newsprint mill: the need for a complementary approach. Tappi J 6:19–25

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Blanco MA, Negro C, Gaspar I, Tijero J (1996) Slime problems in the paper and board industry. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 46:203–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bohus V, Tóth EM, Székely AJ, Makk J, Baranyi K et al (2010) Microbiological investigation of an industrial ultra pure supply water plant using cultivation-based and cultivation-independent methods. Water Res 44:6124–6132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Davis CK, Casini G (2002) Novel biocide provides effective microbiological control without adversely affecting the papermaking process. Paper Summit 2002. Atlanta, GA, USA. TAPPI Proceedings

  7. Granhall U, Welsh A, Throbäck I, Hjort K, Hansson M, Hallin S (2010) Bacterial community diversity in paper mills processing recycled paper. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 37:1061–1069

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hamm U, Schabel S (2007) Effluent-free papermaking: industrial experiences and latest developments in the German paper industry. Water Sci Technol 55:205–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jansson AC (2011) Environmentally friendly solutions for process stability using carbon dioxide. Appita J 64:238–242

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Manes C-L de O, West N, Rapenne S, Lebaron P (2011) Dynamic bacterial communities on reverse-osmosis membranes in a full-scale desalination plant. Biofouling 27:47–58

  11. Michelland RJ, Dejean S, Combes S, Lamothe L, Cauquil L (2009) StatFingerprints: a friendly graphical interface program for microbial fingerprint profiles processing and analysis. Mol Ecol Resour 9:1359–1363

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Oksanen J (2010) Multivariate analysis of ecological communities in R: vegan tutorial. http://cc.oulu.fi/~jarioksa/softhelp/vegan.html

  13. Oksanen J, Kindt R, Legendre P, O’Hara B, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens M, Wagner H (2010) vegan: community ecology package. R-package version 1.17-2. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan

  14. Olstorpe M, Schnurer J, Passoth V (2010) Microbial changes during storage of moist crimped cereal barley grain under Swedish farm conditions. Anim Feed Sci Technol 156:37–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Peres-Neto PR, Jackson DA (2001) How well do multivariate data sets match? The advantages of a procrustean superimposition approach over the Mantel test. Oecologia 129:169–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. R development core team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. version 2.10.0. Vienna, Austria, R Foundation for Statistical Computing

  17. Robertson JA, l’Anson KJA, Brocklehurst TF, Faulds CB, Waldron KW (2010) Effect of storage conditions on the microbial ecology and biochemical stability of cell wall components in Brewers’ spent grain. J Agric Food Chem 58:7266–7272

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rochex A, Godon JJ, Bernet N, Escudié R (2008) Role of shear stress on composition, diversity and dynamics of biofilm bacterial communities. Water Res 42:4915–4922

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rodriguez–Rodriguez CE, Rodriguez-Cavallini E, Blanco R (2009) Bacterial contamination of automotive fuels in a tropical region: the case of Costa Rica. Rev Biol Trop 57:489–504

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Suihko ML, Kroppenstedt RM, Stackebrandt E (2006) Occurrence and characterization of actinobacteria and thermoactinomycetes isolated from pulp and board samples containing recycled fibres. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 33:183–191

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Thibodeau JB, Chabot B, Daneault C (2005) Calcium ion removal by a synthetic zeolite in the manufacture of mechanical grade papers. Pulp Pap Can 106:42–45

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tiirola M, Lahtinen T, Vuento M, Oker-Blom C (2009) Early succession of bacterial biofilms in paper machines. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 36:929–937

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Watanabe K, Kodama Y, Kaku N (2002) Diversity and abundance of bacteria in an underground oil-storage cavity. BMC Microbiol 2:23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful for financial support in part from Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR), France, under grant No. ANR-08-ECOT-003. We are also very grateful to Armand Klem of Norske Skog Golbey (NSG), Golbey (France), for generous assistance during sampling, enlightening insight into the workings of a paper mill, and fruitful discussions before and during the preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Milferstedt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Milferstedt, K., Godon, J.J., Escudié, R. et al. Heterogeneity and spatial distribution of bacterial background contamination in pulp and process water of a paper mill. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 39, 1751–1759 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-012-1196-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-012-1196-8

Keywords

Navigation