Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology

, Volume 39, Issue 9, pp 1321–1331 | Cite as

Biofilm establishment and heavy metal removal capacity of an indigenous mining algal-microbial consortium in a photo-rotating biological contactor

Biotechnology Methods


An indigenous mining algal-microbial consortium was immobilised within a laboratory-scale photo-rotating biological contactor (PRBC) that was used to investigate the potential for heavy metal removal from acid mine drainage (AMD). The microbial consortium, dominated by Ulothrix sp., was collected from the AMD at the Sar Cheshmeh copper mine in Iran. This paper discusses the parameters required to establish an algal-microbial biofilm used for heavy metal removal, including nutrient requirements and rotational speed. The PRBC was tested using synthesised AMD with the multi-ion and acidic composition of wastewater (containing 18 elements, and with a pH of 3.5 ± 0.5), from which the microbial consortium was collected. The biofilm was successfully developed on the PRBC’s disc consortium over 60 days of batch-mode operation. The PRBC was then run continuously with a 24 h hydraulic residence time (HRT) over a ten-week period. Water analysis, performed on a weekly basis, demonstrated the ability of the algal-microbial biofilm to remove 20–50 % of the various metals in the order Cu > Ni > Mn > Zn > Sb > Se > Co > Al. These results clearly indicate the significant potential for indigenous AMD microorganisms to be exploited within a PRBC for AMD treatment.


Acid mine drainage Microalgae Biofilm Photo-rotating biological contactor Biotreatment 


  1. 1.
    Aguilera A, Souza-Egipsy V, Gomez F, Amils R (2007) Development and structure of eukaryotic biofilms in an extreme acidic environment, Rio Tinto (SW, Spain). Microb Ecol 53:294–305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aguilera A, Manrubia SC, Gomez F, Rodriguez N, Amils R (2006) Eukaryotic community distribution and their relationship with the water physicochemical parameters in an extreme acidic environment. Rio Tinto (SW, Spain). Appl Environ Microbiol 72:5325–5330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aguilera A, Gomez F, Lospitao E, Amils R (2006) Molecular approach to the characterization of eukaryotic communities of an extreme acidic environment: methods for DNA extraction and DGGE analysis. Syst Appl Microbiol 29:593–605PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aguilera A, Gonzalez-Toril E, Souza-Egipsy V, Amaral-Zettler L, Zettler E, Amils R (2010) Phototrophic biofilms from Rio Tinto, an extreme acidic environment, the prokaryotic component. Microb Mats 14:469–481Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ahalya K, Ramachandra T, Kanamadi R (2003) Biosorption of heavy metals. Res J Chem Environ 7(4):71–79Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Akhtar N, Iqbal M, Zafar S, Iqbal J (2008) Biosorption characteristics of unicellular green alga Chlorella sorokiniana immobilized in loofa sponge for removal of Cr(III). J Environ Sci 20:231–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Akhtar N, Iqbal J, Iqbal M (2004) Removal and recovery of nickel(II) from aqueous solution by loofa sponge-immobilized biomass of Chlorella sorokiniana: characterization studies. J Hazard Mater 108:85–94Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Aksu Z, Sag Y, Kutsal T (1992) The biosorption of copper by C. vulgaris and Z. ramigera. Environ Technol 13:579–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Amaral Zettler LA, Gomez F, Zettler E, Keenan BG, Amils R, Sogin ML (2002) Eukaryotic diversity in Spain’s River of Fire. Nat 417:137Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Andersen RA (2005) Algal culturing techniques. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    APHA/AWWA (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bayramoglu G, Tuzun I, Celik G, Yilmaz M, Arica MY (2006) Biosorption of mercury, cadmium and lead ions from aqueous system by microalgae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii immobilised in alginate beads. Int J Miner Process 81:35–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bhattacharya J, Islam M, Cheong YW (2006) Microbial growth and action: implications for passive bioremediation of acid mine drainage. Mine Water Environ 25:233–240Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bold HC (1949) The morphology of Chlamydomonas schlamydogama Sp. Nov. Bull Torrey Bot Club 76:101–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brake SS, Dannelly HK, Connors KA (2001) Controls on the nature and distribution of an alga in coal mine-waste environments and its potential impact on water quality. Environ Geol 40:458–469Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brake SS, Connors KH, Romberger S (2001) A river runs through it: impact of acid mine drainage on the geochemistry of West Little Sugar Creek pre- and post-reclamation at the Green Valley coal mine, Indiana, USA. Environ Geol 40:1471–1481Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brookins DG (1988) Eh-pH Diagrams for geochemistry. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cortez S, Teixeira P, Oliveira R, Mota M (2008) Rotating biological contactors: a review on main factors affecting performance. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 7:155–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Costley SC, Wallis FM (2001) Bioremediation of heavy metals in a synthetic wastewater using a rotating biological contactor. Water Res 35:3715–3723PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Costley SC, Wallis FM (2001) Treatment of heavy metal-polluted wastewaters using the biofilms of a multistage rotating biological contactor. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 17:71–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Costley SC, Wallis FM (2000) Effect of flow rate on heavy metal accumulation by rotating biological contactor (RBC) biofilms. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 24:244–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Costley SC, Wallis FM (1999) Effect of disk rotational speed on heavy metal accumulation by rotating biological contactor (RBC) biofilms. Lett Appl Microbiol 29:401–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Das BK, Roy A, Singh S, Bhattacharya J (2009) Eukaryotes in acidic mine drainage environments: potential applications in bioremediation. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 8:257–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Das BK, Roy A, Koschorreck M, Mandal SM, Wendt-Potthoff K, Bhattacharya J (2009) Occurrence and role of algae and fungi in acid mine drainage environment with special reference to metals and sulfate immobilization. Water Res 43:883–894PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Das N, Vimala R, Karthika P (2008) Biosorption of heavy metals—an overview. Indian J Biotechnol 7:159–169Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dvorak DH, Hedin RS, Edenborn HM, McIntire PE (1992) Treatment of metal-contaminated water using bacterial sulphate reduction: results from pilot scale reactors. Biotechnol Bioeng 40:609–616PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ferris FG, Schultze S, Witten TC, Fyfe WS, Beveridge TJ (1989) Metal interactions with microbial biofilms in acidic and neutral pH environments. Appl Environ Microbiol 55(5):1249–1257PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gadd GM, Griffiths AJ (1978) Microorganims and heavy metal toxicity. Microbial Ecol 4:303–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Graham JM, Kranzfelder JA, Auer MT (1985) Light and temperature as factors regulating seasonal growth and distribution of Ulothrix zonata (Ulvophyceae). J Phycol 21:228–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gyure RA, Konopka A, Brooks A, Doemel W (1987) Algal and bacterial activities in acidic (pH 3) strip mine lakes. Appl Environ Microbiol 53:2069–2076PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Harris PO, Ramelow GJ (1990) Binding of metal ions by particulate biomass derived from Chlorella vulgaris and Scenedesmus quadricauda. Environ Sci Technol 24:220–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jong T, Parry DL (2003) Removal of sulphate and heavy metals by sulphate reducing bacteria in short-term bench scale upflow anaerobic packed bed reactor runs. Water Res 37:3379–3389PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kalin M, Wheeler WN, Meinrath G (2004) The removal of uranium from mining waste water using algal/microbial biomass. J Environ Radioact 78:151–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kapoor A, Dinardo O, Kuiper A (2004) Biological oxidation of ferrous ions under acidic conditions using rotating biological contactor. Environ Eng Sci 3:311–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kargi F, Eker S (2001) Rotating-perforated-tubes biofilm reactor for high-strength wastewater treatment. J Environ Eng 127:959–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Koschorreck M, Tittel J (2002) Benthic photosynthesis in acidic mining lake (pH. 2.6). Limnol Oceanogr 47:1197–1201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lottermoser BG (2007) Mine wastes: characterization, treatment and environmental impacts. Springer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lottermoser BG, Ashley PM, Lawie DC (1999) Environmental geochemistry of the Gulf Creek copper mine area, north-eastern NSW, Australia. Environ Geol 39:61–74Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Malik A (2004) Metal bioremediation through growing cells. Environ Int 30:261–278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Malkoç E, Nuhoglu Y (2003) The removal of chromium (VI) from synthetic wastewater by Ulothrix zonata. Fresenius Environ Bulletin 4:376–381Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Matsumoto H, Hamasaki A, Shioji N, Ikuta Y (1996) Influence of dissolved oxygen on photosynthetic rate of microalgae. J Chem Eng Jpn 29:711–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mathure P, Patwardhan A (2005) Comparison of mass transfer efficiency in horizontal rotating packed beds and rotating biological contactors. J Chem Tech Biotechnol 80:413–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mehta SK, Gaur JP (2005) Use of algae for removing heavy metal ions from wastewater: progress and prospects. Crit Rev Biotechnol 25:113–152Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Munoz R, Guieysse B (2006) Algal-bacterial processes for the treatment of hazardous contaminants: a review. Water Res 40:2799–2815Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Munoz R, Kollner C, Guieysse B, Mattiasson B (2004) Photosynthetically oxygenated salicylate biodegradation in a continous stirred tank photobioreactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 87(6):797–803PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Nasr FA, Badr NM, Doma HS (2006) Flavour industry wastewater management case study. Environment 26:31–39Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Niyogi DK, Lewis WM Jr, McKnight DM (2002) Effects of stress from mine drainage on diversity, biomass, and function of primary producers in mountain streams. Ecosyst 5:554–567Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Olem H, Unz RF (1977) Acid mine drainage treatment with rotating biological contactors. Biotechnol Bioeng 19:1475–1491Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Olem H, Unz RF (1980) Rotating-disc biological treatment of acid mine drainage. Water Pollut Cont Fed 52:257–269Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Orandi S, Lewis DM (2012) Synthesising acid mine drainage to maintain and exploit indigenous mining micro-algae and microbial assemblies for biotreatment investigations. Environ Sci Pollut Res (in press) (manuscript no. ESPR-D-12-00241)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Orandi S, Yaghubpur A, Sahraei H, Behrouz M (2007) Influence of acid mine drainage on aquatic life at Sar Cheshmeh copper mine. In: Abstracts of Goldschmidt Conference, Cologne, Germany, A742Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Patwardhan AW (2003) Rotating biological contactors: a review. Ind Eng Chem Res 42:2035–2051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Prasad MNV (2007) Aquatic plants for phytotechnology. In: Singh SN, Tripathi RD (eds) Environmental bioremediation technologies. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Rodgers M, Zhan X (2003) Moving-medium biofilm reactors. Rev Environ Sci Bio Technol 2:213–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Sheoran AS, Bhandari S (2005) Treatment of mine water by a microbial mat: bench scale experiments. Mine Water Environ 24:38–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Souza-Egipsy V, Altamirano M, Amils R, Aguilera A (2011) Photosynthetic performance of phototrophic biofilms in extreme acidic environments. Environ Microbiol 13:8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Travieso L, Pellon A, Benitez F, Sanchez E, Borja R, O’Farrill N, Weiland P (2002) BIOALGA reactor: preliminary studies for heavy metals removal. Biochem Eng J 12:87–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Williams CJ, Aderhold D, Edyvean RGJ (1998) Comparison between biosorbents for the removal of metal ions from aqueous solutions. Water Res 32:216–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Microalgae Engineering Research Group, School of Chemical EngineeringUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.Algae R&D Centre, School of Biological Sciences and BiotechnologyMurdoch UniversityMurdochAustralia

Personalised recommendations