Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Enhanced production of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) in a novel airlift reactor with in situ cell retention using Azohydromonas australica

  • Fermentation, Cell Culture and Bioengineering
  • Published:
Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology

Abstract

Economic production of biodegradable plastics is a challenge particularly because of high substrate and energy cost inputs for its production. Research efforts are being directed towards innovations to minimize both of the above costs to economize polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) production. A novel airlift reactor (ALR) with outer aeration and internal settling was utilized in this investigation. Although it featured no power consumption for agitation, it facilitated increased oxygen transfer rate and better cell retention than stirred tank reactor (STR), thereby resulting in enhanced PHB productivity. ALR with in situ cell retention demonstrated a significant improvement in biomass concentration and biopolymer accumulation. The total PHB production rate, specific biomass, and product yield in the ALR were observed to be 0.84 g/h, 0.43 g/g, and 0.32 g/g, respectively. The studies revealed that the volumetric oxygen mass transfer rate and mixing time for ALR were 0.016 s−1 and 3.73 s, respectively, at 2.0 vvm as compared with corresponding values of 0.005 s−1 and 4.95 s, respectively, in STR. This demonstrated that ALR has better oxygen mass transfer and mixing efficiency than STR. Hence, ALR with cell retention would serve as a better bioreactor design for economic biopolymer production than STR, particularly due to its lower cost of operation and simplicity along with its enhanced oxygen and heat transfer rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alam Z, Muhd NH, Razali F (2005) Scale-up of stirred and aerated bioengineering bioreactor based on constant mass transfer coefficient. J Teknologi 43:95–110

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson AJ, Dawes EA (1990) Occurrence, metabolism, metabolic role, and industrial uses of bacterial polyhydroxyalkanoates. Microbiol Rev 54:450–472

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Barham PJ, Barker P, Organ SJ (1992) Physical properties of poly (hydroxybutyrate) and copolymers of hydroxybutyrate and hydroxyvalerate. FEMS Microbiol Lett 103:289–298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Birch JR, Lambert K, Thompson PW, Kenney AC, Wood LA (1987) Antibody production with airlift fermentors. In: Lydersen BK (ed) Large scale cell culture technology. Hansen, New York, pp 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blakebrough N, Sambamurthy K (1966) Mass transfer and mixing rates in fermentation vessels. Biotechnol Bioeng 8:25–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Braunegg G, Bogensberger B (1985) Zur Kinetik des Wachstums und der Speicherung von Poly-D (-) - 3-hydroxybuttersäure bei Alcaligenes latus. Acta Biotechnol 5:339–345

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chisti MY, Moo-Young M (1987) Airlift reactors: characteristics, applications and design considerations. Chem Eng Comm 60:195–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chisti Y, Moo-young M (1988) Prediction of liquid circulation velocity in airlift reactors with biological media. J Chem Tech Biotechnol 42:211–219

    Google Scholar 

  9. Choi J, Lee SY (1999) Factors affecting economics of polyhydroxyalkanoate production by bacterial fermentation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 51:13–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dominguez A, Couto RS, Sanroman A (2001) Amelioration of ligninolytic enzyme production by Phanerochaete chrysosporium in airlift bioreactor. Biotechnol Lett 23:451–455

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fontana RC, Polidoro TA, da Silveira MM (2009) Comparison of stirred tank and air lift bioreactor in the production of polygalacturonase by Aspergillus oryzae. Bioresour Technol 100:4493–4498

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gavrilescu M, Tudose RZ (1998) Concentric-tube airlift bioreactors. Part 1: effects of geometry on gas hold-up. Bioprocess Eng 19(1):37–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gupta K, Mishra PK, Srivastava P (2009) Enhanced continuous production of lovastatin using pellets and siran supported growth of Aspergillus terreus in an airlift reactor. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 14:207–212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hängii UJ (1990) Pilot scale production of PHB with Alcaligenes latus. In: Dawes EA (ed) Novel biodegradable microbial polymers. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 65–70

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Horwitz W (1980) Official methods of analysis of the association of official analytical chemist. AOAC Methods, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lamare S, Legoy M (1993) Biocatalysis in gas phase. Trends Biotechnol 11:413–419

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee SY (1996) Plastic bacteria? Progress and prospects for polyhydroxyalkanoates production in bacteria. Trends Biotechnol 14:431–438

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Loo CY, Sudesh K (2007) Polyhydroxyalkanoates: bio-based microbial plastics and their properties. Malaysian Polym J 2:31–57

    Google Scholar 

  19. Miller GL (1959) Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem 31:426–428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Plackett RL, Burman JP (1946) The design of optimum multifactorial experiments. Biometrica 33:305–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Riis V, Mai W (1988) Gas chromatographic determination of poly β-hydroxybutyric acid in microbial biomass after hydrochloric propanolysis. J Chromat 445:285–289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Saravanan P, Pakshirajan K, Saha P (2008) Performance of batch stirred tank bioreactor and internal loop airlift bioreactor in degrading phenol using Pseudomonas spp.: a comparative study. J Environ Protect Sci 2:81–86

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tavares LZ, da Silva ES, da Cruz Pradella JG (2004) Production of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) in an airlift bioreactor by Ralstonia eutropha. Biochem Eng 18:21–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang F, Lee SY (1997) Poly (3-hydroxybutyrate) production with high productivity and high polymer content by a fed-batch culture of Alcaligenes latus under nitrogen limitation. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:3703–3706

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang SJ, Zhong JJ (1996) A novel centrifugal impeller bioreactor. II. Oxygen transfer and power consumption. Biotechnol Bioeng 51:520–527

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yezza A, Halasz A, Levadoux W, Hawari J (2007) Production of poly-β-hydroxybutyrate (PHB) by Alcaligenes latus from maple sap. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 77:269–274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yu PHF, Chua H, Huang AL, Lo WH, Ho KP (1999) Transformation of industrial food wastes into polyhydroxyalkanoates. Water Sci Technol 40:365–370

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The senior research fellowship (SRF) awarded by The Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Govt. of India, New Delhi for project execution is gratefully acknowledged by one of the authors (G.G.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashok K. Srivastava.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gahlawat, G., Sengupta, B. & Srivastava, A.K. Enhanced production of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) in a novel airlift reactor with in situ cell retention using Azohydromonas australica . J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 39, 1377–1384 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-012-1138-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-012-1138-5

Keywords

Navigation