Skip to main content
Log in

Post-consumer use efficacies of preservatives in personal care and topical drug products: relationship to preservative category

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology

Abstract

Ninety-six used personal care and topical OTC drug items collected from consumers in the USA were examined for the presence of microbial contaminants. Of the eye and face product type containing global preservative chemistries (i.e., acceptable for use in Japan without major restrictions), 55% yielded numbers of microorganisms in excess of 500 CFU/g (P < 0.1814). For the mascara products with global preservative chemistries, 79% yielded numbers of microorganisms in excess of 500 CFU/g (P < 0.024). Products containing global preservative chemistries accounted for 88% (n = 14) of the products that had microbial contents above 104 CFU/g (P < 0.001). Prominent contaminants were species of Staphylococcus, Pseudomonas, Klebsiella, Streptococcus, Lactobacillus, Bacillus, Corynebacterium, and yeast. In general, under the stress of consumer use, products preserved with global preservative chemistries did not maintain as adequate preservation as products with non-global preservatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berger RL, Boos DD (1994) P values maximized over a confidence set for the nuisance parameter. J Am Stat Assoc 89:1012–1016. doi:10.2307/2290928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brannan DK (1992) Cosmetic microbiology. Encyclopedia of microbiology. Academic Press, Boca Raton, vol 1, pp 593–603

  3. Brannan DK (1995) Cosmetic preservation. J Soc Cosmet Chem 46:199–220

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Brannan DK, Dille JC, Kaufman DJ (1987) Correlation of in vitro challenge testing with consumer-use. Appl Environ Microbiol 53:1827

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Campana R, Scesa C, Patrone V, Vittoria E, Baffone W (2006) Microbiological study of cosmetic products during their use by consumers: health risk and efficacy of preservative. Lett Appl Microbiol 43:301–306. doi:10.1111/j.1472-765X.2006.01952.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cosmetic T, Fragrance Association (1983) Microbiological limit guidelines for cosmetics and toiletries. CTFA technical guidelines. Cosmetic, toiletry, and fragrance association, Inc., Washington

  7. European Economic Community (EU) (1999) Cosmetics legislation. Directive 76/768/EEC, Annex VI, http://www.leffingwell.com/cosmetics/vol_1en.pdf

  8. Farrington JK, Martz EL, Wells SJ, Ennis CC, Holder J, Levchuk JW et al (1994) Ability of laboratory methods to predict in-use efficacy of antimicrobial preservatives in an experimental cosmetic. Appl Environ Microbiol 60:4553–4558

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Federal Register (1977) Notice of intent to propose regulations. 45 FR, pp 54837–54838

  10. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (2000) Center for food safety and applied nutrition. Domestic cosmetics program, cosmetic and color technology, chap 29, http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~comm/cp29001.html

  11. Geis PA (2006) Preservation strategies. In: Geis PA (ed) Cosmetic microbiology, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis, New York

  12. Hitchins AD, Tran TT, McCarron JE (1998) Microbiological methods for cosmetics. In: Tomlinson LA (ed) Bacteriological analytical manual, chap 23, http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~ebam/bam-toc.html

  13. Hugbo PG, Onyekweli AO, Igwe I (2003) Microbial contamination and preservative capacity of some brands of cosmetic creams. Trop J Pharm Res 2:229–234

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare (2000) Communication No. 331. Standards for cosmetics. Article 42, No. 331. http:///.mhlw.go.jp/English/topics/cosmetics

  15. Orus P, Leranoz S (2005) Current trends in cosmetic microbiology. Int Microbiol 8:77–79

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Parker MT (1972) The clinical significance of the presence of micro-organisms in pharmaceutical and cosmetic preparations. J Soc Cosmet Chem 23:415–426

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rope B, Jimenez I (1999) Validation of test methods to ensure reliable results in the lab. Glob Cos Ind 165:24

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The manuscript was derived from doctoral dissertation data. The senior author wishes to gratefully acknowledge the co-authors of this manuscript from the University of Oklahoma, Ralph Tanner, and Georgia State University, Donald Ahearn, for their mentorship and laboratory support. The partial support of the senior author by Constella Group, An SRA International Company, and the statistical analysis by Patrick Crockett, Director of Statistics, are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy D. Ravita.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ravita, T.D., Tanner, R.S., Ahearn, D.G. et al. Post-consumer use efficacies of preservatives in personal care and topical drug products: relationship to preservative category. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 36, 35–38 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-008-0468-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-008-0468-9

Keywords

Navigation