Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of different fermentation conditions on the kinetic parameters and production of volatile compounds during the elaboration of a prickly pear distilled beverage

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology

Abstract

An experimental design considering thermal treatment of must, yeast strain, prickly pear variety and degree of ripeness was chosen to evaluate the fermentation behavior and generation of volatile compounds, during the elaboration of a distilled beverage from prickly pear. Four Mexican prickly pear varieties were characterized physically and two of them were selected for fermentation studies. The thermal treatment of the must showed the highest statistical influence on fermentation behavior and production of volatile compounds, followed by prickly pear variety, then yeast strain and finally the degree of ripeness was the least statistically significant factor. The growth rate increased when the thermal treatment was applied whereas the ethanol production rate and alcoholic efficiency were unaffected. The results also suggested that thermal treatment was effective for inhibition of microbial contamination. As regards volatile compounds production, acetic acid and methanol decreased while other volatiles increased when the thermal treatment was applied. Despite the influence of thermal treatment, prickly pear variety strongly influences the volatile profile of fermented musts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barbera G, Carimi F, Inglese P, Panno M (1992) Physical, morphological and chemical changes during fruit development and ripening in three cultivars of prickly pear, Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Miller. J Hortic Sci 67(3):307–312

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Barbera G, Inglese P, La Mantia T (1994) Seed content and fruit characterization in cactus pear (Opuntia ficus-indica Mill.). Sci Hortic 58:161–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berthels NJ, Cordero-Otero RR, Bauer FF, Thevelin JM, Pretorious IS (2004) Discrepancy in glucose and fructose utilization during fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeast strains. FEMS Yeast Res 4:683–689

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Boehringer P, Jacob L (1964) The determination of alcohol using chromic acid. Zeitschr Flussinges Abst 31:233–236

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boulanger R, Crouzet J (2001) Changes of volatile compounds during heating of bacuri pulp. J Agric Food Chem 49:5911–5915

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bravo-Hollis H (1978) El Cultivo de la tuna. In: UNAM (ed) Las cactaceas de México vol 1. Universidad Nacional Autánoma de México, Mexico city, Mexico, pp 132–161

  7. Bustos OE (1981) Alcoholic beverage from Chilean Opuntia ficus-indica. Am J Enol Vitic 32(3):228–229

    Google Scholar 

  8. Derrick S, Large P (1993) Activities of the enzymes of the Ehrlich pathway and formation of branched-chain alcohols in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida utilis grown in continuous culture on valine or ammonium as sole nitrogen source. J Gen Microbiol 139(11):2783–2792

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dickinson JR, Lanterman M, Danner DJ, Pearson BM, Sanz P, Harrison S, Hewlins JE (1997) A 13c nuclear investigation of the metamolism of leucina to isoamyl alcohol in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 272(43):26871–26878

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. El Kossori RL, Villanume C, El Boustani E, Sauvaire Y, Menean L (1998) Composition of pulp, skin and seeds of prickly pears fruits (Opuntia ficus indica). Plant Foods Hum Nutr 52:263–270

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Espinoza AI, Barrocal R, Jara M, Zarabia PC (1978) Quelques propietés et études preliminaires de conservation des fruits et du jus de figue de barbarie (Opuntia ficus-indica). Fruits 28:285–289

    Google Scholar 

  12. Felker P, Singh G, Pareek OP (1997) The opportunities for development of cactus (Opuntia spp.) in arid and semi-arid regions. Ann Arid Zone 36(3):267–268

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fiore C, Arrizon J, Gschaedler A, Flores J, Romano P (2005) Comparison between wine and agave yeast strains for traits of technological interest. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 21(6–7):1141–1147

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Flath RA, Takahashi JM (1978) Volatile constituents of prickly pear (Opuntia ficus indica Mill., de Castilla variety). J Agric Food Chem 26(4):835–837

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Galati EM, Mondello MR, Giuffrida D, Dugo G, Miceli N Pergolizzi S, Taviano MF (2003) Chemical characterization and biological effects of Sicilian Opuntia ficus-indica (L) mill. fruit juice: antioxidant and antiulcerogenic activity. J Agric Food Chem 51:4903–4908

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gueguen Y, Chemardin P, Janbon G, Arnaud A, Galzy P (1996) A very efficient β-glucosidase catalyst for the hydrolysis of flavor precursors of wines and fruit juices. J Agric Food Chem 44:2336–2340

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gurrieri S, Miceli L, Lanza CM, Tomaselli F, Bonomo RP, Rizzarelli E (2000) Chemical characterization of Sicilian prickly pear (Opuntia ficus indica) and perspectives for the storage of its juice. J Agric Food Chem 48:5424–5431

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Koulibaly A, Sakho M, Crouzet J (1992) Variability of free and bound volatile terpenic compounds in mango. Lebensm Wiss Technol 25:374–379

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kuti JO (1992) Growth and compositional changes during the development of prickly pear fruit. J Hortic Sci 67(6):861–868

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kuti JO, Galloway CM (1994) Sugar composition and invertase activity in prickly pear fruit. J Food Sci 59:387–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ledauphin J, Guichard H, Saint-Clair J-F, Bernard P, Barillier D (2003) Chemical and sensorial aroma characterization of freshly distilled calvados. 2. Identification of volatile compounds and key odorants. J Agric Food Chem 51:433–442

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lilly M, Lambrechts MG, Pretorius IS (2000) Effect of increased yeast alcohol acetyltransferase activity on flavor profiles of wine and distillates. Appl Environ Microbiol 66(2):744–753

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Maarse H (1992) Wine, distilled beverages. In: Maarse H (ed) Volatile compounds in foods and beverages. Arcel Dekker Inc., Ámsterdam, pp 483–580

    Google Scholar 

  24. Miller GL (1959) Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal chem 31(3):426–428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. NOM-006-SCFI (Secretaría de Comercio y Fomento Industrial) (1994) Norma Oficial Mexicana

  26. Pimienta-Barrios E, Mauricio-Leguízamo R (1989) Variación en componentes del fruto maduro entre formas de nopal (Opuntia spp.) tunero. Fitotec Mex 12:183–196

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pronk JT, Steensma HY, van Dijken JP (1996) Piruvate metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 12:1607–1633

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Retamal N, Durán JM, Fernández J (1987) Ethanol production by fermentation of fruits and cladodes of prickly pear cactus [Opuntia ficus-indica (L) Miller]. J Sci Food Agric 40:213–218

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Rodríguez-Madrera R, Blanco-Gomis D, Mangas-Alonso JJ (2003) Influence of distillation system, oak wood type, and aging time on volatile compounds of cider brandy. J Agric Food Chem 51:5709–5714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Romano P, Fiore C, Paraggio M, Caruso A, Capece A (2003) Function of yeasts species and strains in wine flavour. Int J Food Microbiol 86:169–180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sawaya WN, Khalh JK, Al-Muhammed HM (1983) Nutritive value of prickly pear seed, Opuntia ficus-indica. Plant Food Hum Nutr 33:91–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Sepúlveda E, Sáenz C (1990) Nota, Características químicas y físicas de pulpa de tuna (Opuntia Picus-indica). Rev Agroquim Tecnol 30(4):551–555

    Google Scholar 

  33. Silva ML, Malcata FX (1998) Relationships between storage conditions of grape pomace and volatile composition of spirits obtained therefrom. Am J Enol Vitic 49(1):56–64

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Schreier P, Drawert M, Schmid M (1978) Changes in the composition of neutral volatile components during the production of Apple Brandy. J Sci Food Agric 29:728–736

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Stark D, Münch T, Sonnleitner B, Marison IW, von Sockar U (2002) Extractive bioconversion of 2-phenylethanol from l-phenylalanine by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Prog 18:514–523

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. William AA, Tucknott OG (1971) Volatile constituents of fermented cider. I. Draught dry cruder blend. J Sci Food Agric 22:264–269

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by “Fundación Produce San Luis Potosí” (México) grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Arrizon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arrizon, J., Calderón, C. & Sandoval, G. Effect of different fermentation conditions on the kinetic parameters and production of volatile compounds during the elaboration of a prickly pear distilled beverage. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 33, 921–928 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-006-0153-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-006-0153-9

Keywords

Navigation