Skip to main content
Log in

Factorial designs: an efficient approach to choosing the main factors influencing growth and hydrolase production by Tetrahymena thermophila

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology

Abstract

A fractional factorial design with eight trials was applied to select and model the effects of major factors, individually and in combination, on improving Tetrahymena thermophila growth and enzyme production. Regulated pH at 6.8 and olive oil at 0.5% (v/v) showed positive effects on fermentation, and increased cell growth parameters including generation time and maximal population formation. Lipase and protease production were also improved by these factors and were favoured by cultivation of Tetrahymena in darkness. This statistical experiment offers a beneficial and rapid screening procedure to select the most effective combination of factors influencing fermentation processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beynon RJ, Bond JS (1989) Proteolytic enzymes, a practical approach. IRL Press/Oxford University Press, Oxford

  2. Box GEP, Hunger WG, Hunter JS (1978) Statistics for experimenters. Wiley, New York

  3. Caillieret-Ethuin P, Duyme F, Tonon F, Jeanfils J, De Coninck J (1998) Optimisation of Tetrahymena rostrata growth using food by-products as nitrogen source. Biotechnol Tech 12:177–181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Csaba G (1993) Presence in and effects of pineal indolamines at very low level of phylogeny. Experientia 49:627–634

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Csaba G, Cserhalmi M (1985) Influence of biogenic amines (histamines, serotonin) on the function of the lysosomal enzymes of Tetrahymena. Acta Protozool 24:135–138

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Csaba G, Nemeth G, Prohaszka J (1979) Effect of hormones and related compounds on the multiplication of Tetrahymena. Exp Cell Biol 47:307–311

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. De Coninck J, Verdier-Denantes I, Duyme F, Bouquelet S, Dumortier V (2000) Modeling Tetrahymena thermophila growth and protease production. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 25:58–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Destain J, Roblain D, Thonart P (1997) Improvement of lipase production from Yarrowia lipolytica. Biotechnol Lett 19:105–107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gosselin Y, Lognay G, Thonart P (1988) Improvement of fed batch mass culture for g linolenic biosynthesis by Tetrahymena rostrata (protozoa). Biotechnol Lett 11:423–426

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hoffman E, Cleffmann G (1981) External factors limiting the multiplication potential of Tetrahymena. J Cell Sci 50:407–418

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kiy T, Tiedtke A (1992) Mass cultivation of Tetrahymena thermophila yielding high cell densities and short generation times. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 38:141–146

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Köhidai L, Vakkuri O, Keresztesi M, Leppäluoto J, Csaba G (2002) Melatonin in the unicellular Tetrahymena pyriformis: effects of different lighting conditions. Cell Biochem Funct 20:269–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Leclercq B, Exbrayat JM, Duyme F, De Coninck J (2002) New approach to model effects of darkness, melatonin and serotonin on Tetrahymena thermophila growth and hydrolases production. Biotechnol Lett 24:769–774

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Marek A, Bernarski W (1996) Some factors affecting lipase production by yeast and filamentous fungi. Biotechnol lett 18:1155–1160

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Munro IG (1985) Protozoa as sources of commercially produced enzymes—a review. Process Biochem 20:139–148

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rasmussen L, Dive D (1980) Tetrahymena: doubling times and phospholipids. Naturwissenschaffen 67:98

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rick W, Fritsch WP (1974) In: Bergmeyer HU (ed) Methods of enzymatic analysis, vol 2. Verlag Chemie Weinheim, Academic, New York, pp 1046–1052

  18. Sado G, Sado MC (1991) Les plans d’expérience: de l’expérimentation à l’assurance qualité. Afnor, France

  19. Saliba R, Dive D, Devis R (1983) An inexpensive and practical medium rearing mass cultures in Tetrahymena. Protistologica 19:417–421

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tietz NW, Fiereck EA (1966) A specific method for serum lipase determination. Clin Chim 13:352

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Valcarce G, Munoz L, Nusblat A, Nudel C, Florin-Christensen J (2001) The improvement of milk by cultivation with ciliates. J Dairy Sci 84:2136–2143

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wheatley DN, Rasmussen L, Tiedtke A (1994) Tetrahymena: a model for growth, cell cycle and nutritional studies, with biotechnological potential. BioEssays 16:367–372

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank C. Deweer for technical assistance and Dr. Hauesser for helpful reading.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. De Coninck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Coninck, J., Leclercq, B., Exbrayat, J.M. et al. Factorial designs: an efficient approach to choosing the main factors influencing growth and hydrolase production by Tetrahymena thermophila . J IND MICROBIOL BIOTECHNOL 31, 204–208 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-004-0135-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-004-0135-8

Keywords

Navigation