Abstract
The ground-based augmentation system must make provisions to being sufficiently robustness to ionospheric anomalies through the development of an ionospheric anomaly threat model. For developing the threat model in Brazil, earlier work found that ionospheric spatial decorrelations larger than those in the midlatitude regions were frequently observed during the peak of Solar Cycle #24 (current cycle). We provide details of a study of the extreme ionospheric spatial decorrelation observed over Brazil during the March 1, 2014, equatorial plasma bubble (EPB) event. As viewed by two Brazilian GNSS reference stations in São José dos Campos, PRN 03 descended to an elevation angle of about 19° in the northern sky. A spatial decorrelation of 850.7 mm/km at the GPS L1 signal at 01:04:00 UT between the two stations SJCU (23.21° S, 45.96° W) and SSJC (23.20° S, 45.86° W) over a baseline of 9.72 km was discovered, when the line of sight of PRN 03 passed through the transition zone of the EPB. Since the EPB-induced ionospheric scintillation can corrupt the ionospheric gradient estimates, multiple gradient observations were made from multiple stations and satellites to verify the largest gradient observation. Severe gradients discovered at other station–satellite pairs support that the event of PRN 03 is a real anomaly as opposed to a receiver fault or the result of post-processing errors. Since the availability loss was estimated to be 41.7% with the Brazilian threat model, remedies to reduce over-estimated ionospheric impact when evaluating and mitigating ionospheric integrity risk are presented.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alfonsi L, Spogli L, Pezzopane M, Romano V, Zuccheretti E, De Franceschi G, Cabrera MA, Ezquer RG (2013) Comparative analysis of spread-F signature and GPS scintillation occurrences at Tucumán, Argentina. J Geophys Res Sp Phys 118(7):4483–4502. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgra.50378
Bang E, Lee J (2013) Methodology of automated ionosphere front velocity estimation for ground-based augmentation of GNSS. Radio Sci 48(6):659–670. https://doi.org/10.1002/rds.20066
Blewitt G (1990) An automatic editing algorithm for GPS data. Geophys Res Lett 17(3):199–202. https://doi.org/10.1029/gl017i003p00199
Burke WJ (2004) Longitudinal variability of equatorial plasma bubbles observed by DMSP and ROCSAT-1. J Geophys Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004ja010583
Datta-Barua S, Lee J, Pullen S, Luo M, Ene A, Qiu D, Zhang G, Enge P (2010) Ionospheric threat parameterization for local area global-positioning-system-based aircraft landing systems. J Aircr 47(4):1141–1151. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.46719
Jung S, Lee J (2012) Long-term ionospheric anomaly monitoring for ground based augmentation systems. Radio Sci. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012rs005016
Kim M, Choi Y, Jun H-S, Lee J (2014) GBAS ionospheric threat model assessment for category I operation in the Korean region. GPS Solut 19(3):443–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-014-0404-6
Lee J, Pullen S, Datta-Barua S, Enge P (2007) Assessment of ionosphere spatial decorrelation for global positioning system-based aircraft landing systems. J Aircr 44(5):1662–1669. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.28199
Lee J, Datta-Barua S, Zhang G, Pullen S, Enge P (2011a) Observations of low-elevation ionospheric anomalies for ground-based augmentation of GNSS. Radio Sci 46(6):RS6005. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011rs004776
Lee J, Seo J, Park YS, Pullen S, Enge P (2011b) Ionospheric threat mitigation by geometry screening in ground-based augmentation systems. J Aircr 48(4):1422–1433. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c031309
Mayer C, Belabbas B, Jakowski N, Meurer M (2009) Ionosphere threat space model assessment for GBAS. In: Proceedings of ION GNSS-2009, Institute of Navigation, Savannah, pp 1091–1099
Moraes A, Costa E, Abdu M, Rodrigues F, Paula E, Oliveira K, Perrella W (2017) The variability of low-latitude ionospheric amplitude and phase scintillation detected by a triple-frequency GPS receiver. Radio Sci 52(4):439–460. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016rs006165
Moraes A, Vani B, Costa E, Abdu M, Paula E, Sousasant J, Monico J, Forte B, Negreti P, Shimabukuro M (2018) GPS availability and positioning issues when the signal paths are aligned with ionospheric plasma bubbles. GPS Solut. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-018-0760-8
Mukherjee GK, Carlo L, Mahajan SH, Patil PT (1998) First results of all-sky imaging from India. Earth Planets Sp 50(2):119–127. https://doi.org/10.1186/bf03352093
Nishioka M, Saito A, Tsugawa T (2008) Occurrence characteristics of plasma bubble derived from global ground-based GPS receiver networks. J Geophys Res Sp Phys. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007ja012605
Pereira VAS (2018) Investigation of GBAS usability in Brazil. Dissertation, Sao Paulo State University
Pereira VAS, Camargo PO (2017) Brazilian active GNSS networks as systems for monitoring the ionosphere. GPS Solut 21(3):1013–1025
Pradipta R, Doherty PH (2016) Assessing the occurrence pattern of large ionospheric TEC gradients over the Brazilian airspace. Navigation 63(3):335–343. https://doi.org/10.1002/navi.141
RTCA (2008) Minimum operational performance standards for GPS local area augmentation system airborne equipment, DO-253C. Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics (RTCA), Washington, DC
Saito S, Yoshihara T (2017) Evaluation of extreme ionospheric total electron content gradient associated with plasma bubbles for GNSS ground-based augmentation system. Radio Sci 52(8):951–962. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017rs006291
Sánchez-Naranjo S, Rincón W, Ramos-Pollán R, Gonzáleza FA, Soleyc S (2017) A comprehensive assessment of ionospheric gradients observed in Ecuador during 2013 and 2014 for ground based augmentation systems. Adv Sp Res 59(8):1992–2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.02.001
Seo J, Lee J, Pullen S, Enge P, Close S (2012) Targeted parameter inflation within ground-based augmentation systems to minimize anomalous ionospheric impact. J Aircr 49(2):587–599. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c031601
Simili D, Pervan B (2006) Code-carrier divergence monitoring for the GPS local area augmentation system. In: Proceedings of IEEE/ION PLANS 2006, Institute of Navigation, San Diego, CA, 25-27 April, pp 483–493
Sunda S, Yadav S, Sridharan R, Bagiya MS, Khekale PV, Singh P, Satish SV (2017) SBAS-derived TEC maps: a new tool to forecast the spatial maps of maximum probable scintillation index over India. GPS Solut 21(4):1469–1478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-017-0625-6
Terkildsen M (2010) GBAS ionospheric threat model evaluation: mid-latitude Australian region IPS-CR-09-01-P. IPS Radio and Space Services, Haymarket
Yang TY (1986) Finite element structural analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Yoon M, Lee J (2014) Medium-scale traveling ionospheric disturbances in the Korean region on 10 november 2004: potential impact on GPS-based navigation systems. Sp Weather 12(4):173–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013sw001002
Yoon M, Kim D, Lee J (2017a) Validation of ionospheric spatial decorrelation observed during equatorial plasma bubble events. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 55:261–271. https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2016.2604861
Yoon M, Lee J, Pullen S, Pullen S, Gillespie J, Mather N, Cole R, Souza JR, Doherty P, Pradipta R (2017b) Equatorial plasma bubble threat parameterization to support GBAS operations in the Brazilian region. Navigation 64(3):309–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/navi.203
Yoon M, Kim D, Pullen S, Lee J (2019) Assessment and mitigation of equatorial plasma bubble impacts on category I GBAS operations in the Brazilian region. Navigation 66(3):643–659. https://doi.org/10.1002/navi.328
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Sam Pullen of Stanford University, Joseph Gillespie of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Navin Mathur and Rich Cole of Mirus Technology, Patricia Doherty and Rezy Pradipta of Boston College, and Jonas Rodrigues de Souza of the National Institute for Space Research in Brazil for their support of this work. The opinions expressed in this paper are solely those of the authors. Moonseok Yoon was supported by the Space Core Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (NRF-2014M1A3A3A02034937). Dongwoo Kim was supported by the Korea Polar Research Institute (KOPRI, PE19900).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yoon, M., Kim, D. & Lee, J. Extreme ionospheric spatial decorrelation observed during the March 1, 2014, equatorial plasma bubble event. GPS Solut 24, 47 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-020-0960-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-020-0960-x