Skip to main content
Log in

A modified geometry- and ionospheric-free combination for static three-carrier ambiguity resolution

  • Original Article
  • Published:
GPS Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The reliability of the classical geometry- and ionospheric-free (GIF) three-carrier ambiguity resolution (TCAR) degrades when applied to long baselines of hundreds of kilometers. To overcome this deficiency, we propose two new models, which are used sequentially to resolve wide-lane (WL) and narrow-lane (NL) ambiguities and form a stepwise ambiguity resolution (AR) strategy. In the first model, after a successful extra-wide-lane AR, the pseudorange and phase observations are combined to estimate WL ambiguities, in which the residual ionospheric delays and geometry effects are eliminated. In the second model, using the resolved ambiguities from the first step, the two WL ambiguities are combined to remove ionospheric and geometry effects. The unknown coefficients in the two models are determined in such that they minimize the formal errors in the ambiguity estimates to optimize the ambiguity estimation. Using experimental BeiDou triple-frequency observations, we evaluate our method and identify three advantages. First, the two models use double-differenced phase observations that are not differences across frequency. Second, the two models are entirely free from ionospheric delay and geometry effects. Third, the unknown estimates in the two models satisfy the minimum noise condition, which makes the formal errors in the float NL ambiguity estimates much lower than those obtained with common GIF TCAR methods, thereby directly and significantly increasing the success rate of AR compared to the cascaded integer resolution method and two other GIF combinations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cocard M, Bourgon S, Kamali O, Collins P (2008) A systematic investigation of optimal carrier-phase combinations for modernized triple-frequency GPS. J Geodesy 82(9):555–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng Y (2008) GNSS three carrier ambiguity resolution using ionosphere-reduced virtual signals. J Geodesy 82(12):847–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng Y, Rizos C (2005) Three carrier approaches for future global, regional and local GNSS positioning services: concepts and performance perspectives. In: Proceedings of the ION GNSS 2005. Institute of Navigation, Long Beach, USA, September 13–16, pp 2277–2278

  • Hatch R (2006) A new three-frequency, geometry-free technique for ambiguity resolution. In: Proceedings of the ION GNSS 2006. Institute of Navigation, Fort Worth, TX, USA, September 26–29, pp 309–316

  • Henkel P, Günther C (2012) Reliable integer ambiguity resolution: multi-frequency code carrier linear combinations and statistical a priori knowledge of attitude. Navigation 59(1):61–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji S, Wang X, Xu Y, Wang Z, Chen W, Liu H (2014) First preliminary fast static ambiguity resolution results of medium-baseline with triple-frequency BeiDou wavebands. J Navig 67(6):1109–1119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li B, Feng Y, Shen Y (2010) Three carrier ambiguity resolution: distance-independent performance demonstrated using semi-generated triple frequency GPS signals. GPS Solutions 14(2):177–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richert T, El-Sheimy N (2007) Optimal linear combinations of triple frequency carrier phase data from future global navigation satellite systems. GPS Solutions 11(1):11–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang W, Deng C, Shi C, Liu J (2014) Triple-frequency carrier ambiguity resolution for Beidou navigation satellite system. GPS Solutions 18(3):335–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen P, Joosten P, Tiberius C (2002) A comparison of TCAR, CIR and LAMBDA GNSS ambiguity resolution. In: Proceedings of the ION GPS, 2002. Institute of Navigation, Portland, OR, September 24–27, pp. 2799–2808

  • Verhagen S (2004) Integer ambiguity validation: an open problem? GPS Solutions 8(1):36–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhagen S (2005) The GNSS integer ambiguities: estimation and validation. Dissertation, Delft University of Technology, TU Delft

  • Wang K, Rothacher M (2015) GNSS triple-frequency geometry-free and ionosphere-free track-to-track ambiguities. Adv Space Res 55(11):2668–2677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanninger L, Beer S (2015) BeiDou satellite-induced code pseudorange variations: diagnosis and therapy. GPS Solutions 19(4):639–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wielgosz P (2011) Quality assessment of GPS rapid static positioning with weighted ionospheric parameters in generalized least squares. GPS Solutions 15(2):89–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Ji S (2015) Data quality assessment and the positioning performance analysis of BeiDou in Hong Kong. Surv Rev 47(345):446–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Q, Dai Z, Hu Z, Sun B, Shi C, Liu J (2015) Three-carrier ambiguity resolution using the modified TCAR method. GPS Solutions 19(4):589–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the comments from Professor Maorong Ge at GFZ and two anonymous reviewers. This work was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41231064, 41574032), the National Basic Research Program of China 2012CB825604 and the CAS/SAFEA International Partnership Program for Creative Research Teams (KZZD-EW-TZ-05).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yafei Ning.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ning, Y., Yuan, Y. A modified geometry- and ionospheric-free combination for static three-carrier ambiguity resolution. GPS Solut 21, 1633–1645 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-017-0642-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-017-0642-5

Keywords

Navigation