Abstract
Considering the contribution of the hardware biases to the estimated clock errors, an improved method for estimating the satellite inter-frequency clock bias (IFCB) is presented, i.e., the difference in the satellite clock error as computed from ionospheric-free pseudorange and carrier phase observations using L1/L2 and P1/P2 versus L1/L5 and P1/P5. The IFCB is composed of a constant and a variable part. The constant part is the inter-frequency hardware bias (IFHB). It contains the satellite and receiver hardware delays and can be expressed as a function of the DCBs [DCB (P1 − P2) and DCB (P1 − P5)]. When a reference satellite is selected, the satellite IFHB can be computed but is biased by a reference satellite IFHB. This bias will not affect the utilization of IFCB in positioning since it can be absorbed by the receiver clock error. Triple-frequency observations of 30 IGS stations between June 1, 2013, and May 31, 2014, were processed to show the variations of the IFHB. The IFHB values show a long-term variation with time. When a linear and a fourth-order harmonic function are used to model the estimated IFCB, which contains contributions of the hardware delays and clock errors, the results show that 89 % of the IFCB can be corrected given the current five triple-frequency GPS satellites with the averaged fitting RMS of 1.35 cm. Five days of data are processed to test the estimated satellite clock errors using the strategy presented. The residuals of P1/P5 and L1/L5 have a STD of <0.27 m and 0.97 cm, respectively. In addition, most predicted satellite IFCBs reach an accuracy of centimeter level and its mean accuracy of 5 days is better than 7 cm.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dow J, Neilan R, Rizos C (2009) The international GNSS service in a changing landscape of global navigation satellite systems. J Geod 83(3–4):191–198
Feng Y, Li B (2010) Wide area real time kinematic decimeter positioning with multiple carrier GNSS signals. Sci China Earth Sci 53(5):731–749
Gao Y, Lahaye F, Heroux Liao X, Beck N, Olynik M (2001) Modeling and estimation of C1–P1 bias in GPS receivers. J Geod 74:621–626
Keshin M (2012) A new algorithm for single receiver DCB estimation using IGS TEC maps. GPS Solut 16(3):282–292
Li B, Feng Y, Shen Y (2010) Three carrier ambiguity resolution: distance-independent performance demonstrated using semi-generated triple frequency GPS signals. GPS Solut 14(2):177–184
Li H, Zhou X, Wu B, Wang J (2012) Estimation of the inter-frequency clock bias for the satellites of PRN25 and PRN01. Sci China Phys Mech Astron 55(11):2186–2193
Li B, Shen Y, Zhang X (2013a) Triple frequency GNSS navigation prospect demonstrated with semi-simulated data. Adv Space Res 51:1175–1185
Li H, Zhou X, Wu B (2013b) Fast estimation and analysis of the inter-frequency clock bias for Block IIF satellites. GPS Solut 17(3):347–355
Li H, Chen Y, Wu B, Hu X, He F, Tang G, Gong X, Chen J (2013c) Modeling and initial assessment of the inter-frequency clock bias for COMPASS GEO satellites. Adv Space Res 51(12):2277–2284
Li H, Xu T, Li B, Huang S, Wang J (2015) A new differential code bias (C1–P1) estimation method and its performance evaluation. GPS Solut. doi:10.1007/s10291-015-0438-4
Montenbruck O, Hugentobler U, Dach R, Steigenberger P, Hauschild A (2012) Apparent clock variations of the Block IIF-1 (SVN62) GPS satellite. GPS Solut 16:303–313
Zumberge JF, Heflin MB, Jefferson DC, Watkins MM, Webb FH (1997) Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks. J Geophys Res 102(B3):5005–5017
Acknowledgments
This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41204034, 41374031, and 41174023). IGS is acknowledged for providing RINEX data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, H., Li, B., Xiao, G. et al. Improved method for estimating the inter-frequency satellite clock bias of triple-frequency GPS. GPS Solut 20, 751–760 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-015-0486-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-015-0486-9