Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dynamic multipath in structural bridge monitoring: an experimental approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
GPS Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vehicles such as passing trains produce significant short-term biases in coordinates of nearby GPS stations, preventing these coordinates from being used for structural monitoring of bridges. In order to study this problem, we carried out experiments with receivers recording at 100 Hz and located on both sides of a rail next to passing trains. The experiments focused on trains with similar characteristics and velocity. The analysis of the data revealed a short-duration bias in coordinates with amplitude up to 10 cm and high spectral frequencies. This bias is not due to wrong integer ambiguity fixing, software defects, and changing geometry of satellites and it does not significantly improve with the addition of GLONASS satellites. It is partly due to temporary blocking of certain satellites by passing vehicles and a dynamic multipath due to fast-moving, near-field reflective surfaces. This dynamic multipath seems to depend on the geometry of satellites and to be characterized by a shift of coordinates during the whole interval of the vehicle passage, as well as by very short-period coordinate fluctuations which are related to specific morphological characteristics of the train reflective surfaces. The amplitude of the dynamic multipath is smaller in the horizontal coordinates, which are also characterized by a clearer pattern than the vertical coordinates. On the basis of the above results, certain strategies for the modeling of the dynamic multipath are proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amiri-Simkooei AR, Tiberius CCJM (2006) Assessing receiver noise using GPS short baseline time series. GPS Solut 11(1):21–35. doi:10.1007/s10291-006-0026-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan W-S, Xu Y-L, Ding X-L et al (2006) Assessment of dynamic measurement accuracy of GPS in three directions. J Surv Eng 132(3):108–117. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9453(2006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elósegui P, Davis JL, Jaldehag RTK et al (1995) Geodesy using the Global Positioning System: the effects of signal scattering on estimates of site position. J Geophys Res 100(B6):9921–9934. doi:199510.1029/95JB00868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genrich JF, Bock Y (2006) Instantaneous geodetic positioning with 10–50 Hz GPS measurements: noise characteristics and implications for monitoring networks. J Geophys Res 111(B3):B03403. doi:200610.1029/2005JB003617

    Google Scholar 

  • Han S, Rizos C (1997) Multipath effects on GPS in mine environments. 10th international congress of the international society for mine surveying fremantle, Australia

  • Herring T (2000) GLOBK: Global Kalman filter VLBI and GPS analysis program, vol 10.0. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kijewski-Correa T, Kochly M (2007) Monitoring the wind-induced response of tall buildings: GPS performance and the issue of multipath effects. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 95(9–11):1176–1198. doi:10.1016/j.jweia.2007.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogan MG, Kim W-Y, Bock Y, Smyth AW (2008) Load response on a large suspension bridge during the NYC marathon revealed by GPS and accelerometers. Seismol Res Lett 79(1):12–19. doi:10.1785/gssrl.79.1.12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson KM, Bilich A, Axelrad P (2007) Improving the precision of high-rate GPS. J Geophys Res 112(B5):B05422. doi:200710.1029/2006JB004367

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson K, Small E, Gutmann E et al (2008) Using GPS multipath to measure soil moisture fluctuations: initial results. GPS Solut 12(3):173–177. doi:10.1007/s10291-007-0076-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matayoshi N, Okuno Y (2007) In-flight GPS-signal-reception anomalies of helicopters. J Aircr 44(5):1755–1757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng X, Dodson AH, Roberts GW (2007) Detecting bridge dynamics with GPS and triaxial accelerometers. Eng Struct 29(11):3178–3184. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.03.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moschas F, Stiros S (2011) Measurement of the dynamic displacements and of the modal frequencies of a short-span pedestrian bridge using GPS and an accelerometer. Eng Struct 33(1):10–17. doi:16/j.engstruct.2010.09.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moschas F, Psimoulis P, Stiros S (in press) GPS RTS data fusion to overcome signal deficiencies in certain bridge dynamic monitoring projects. Smart Struct Syst (accepted)

  • Nedic S (2009) On GPS signal multipath modeling in dynamic environments. 2009 IEEE Aerospace conference, pp. 1–12

  • Pytharouli S, Stiros S (2008) Spectral analysis of unevenly spaced or discontinuous data using the “normperiod” code. Comput Struct 86(1–2):190–196. doi:16/j.compstruc.2007.02.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts G, Ding X, Dodson A, Cosser E (2002) Multipath mitigation for bridge deformation monitoring. J Glob Position Syst 1(1):25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Rizos C, Stewart MP, Leick A (2001) GPS and GLONASS integration: modeling and ambiguity resolution issues. GPS Solut 5(1):55–64. doi:10.1007/PL00012877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson C, Watson T, Coleman R (2007) Structural monitoring of cable-stayed bridge: analysis of GPS versus modeled deflections. J Surv Eng 133(1):23–28. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9453(2007)133:1(23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel H (2009) Health monitoring of bridges. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wieser A, Brunner FK (2002) Analysis of bridge deformations using continuous GPS measurements. INGEO2002, 2nd conference of engineering surveying. In: Kopáčik A and Kyrinovič P (eds), Bratislava, 45–52

  • Yi T, Li H, Gu M (2010) Full-scale measurements of dynamic response of suspension bridge subjected to environmental loads using GPS technology. Sci China Technol Sci 53(2):469–479. doi:10.1007/s11431-010-0051-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi T-H, Li H-N, Gu M (2011) Characterization and extraction of global positioning system multipath signals using an improved particle-filtering algorithm. Meas Sci Technol 22(7):075101. doi:10.1088/0957-0233/22/7/075101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi T-H, Li H-N, Gu M (2013) Experimental assessment of high-rate GPS receivers for deformation monitoring of bridge. Measurement 46(1):420–432. doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2012.07.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Vasso Saltogianni, Nicos Moschonas, and four students for their help in the experiments. Constructive comments by two anonymous reviewers are also acknowledged. This study was funded by the Karatheodori 2009-C-898 research program of the University of Patras.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Geodesy and Geodetic Applications, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Patras, Patras, Greece

    Fanis Moschas & Stathis Stiros

Authors
  1. Fanis Moschas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stathis Stiros
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stathis Stiros.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moschas, F., Stiros, S. Dynamic multipath in structural bridge monitoring: an experimental approach. GPS Solut 18, 209–218 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-013-0322-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-013-0322-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation