Skip to main content
Log in

URTK: undifferenced network RTK positioning

  • Original Article
  • Published:
GPS Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Standard network RTK has been widely used since it was proposed in the mid-1990s. Rovers can obtain high-precision estimates of position by resolving double-differenced (DD) ambiguities. The focus of this study is a new undifferenced network RTK method, abbreviated as URTK hereafter, based on undifferenced (UD) observation corrections whose single-differenced (SD) ambiguities between satellites can be resolved in several seconds. The tools for studying the real-time realization of the new method are our developments of logical schemes that have the capability for the real-time modeling of a reference network and the instantaneous resolution of SD ionosphere-free (IF) ambiguities at a single station. This research demonstrates the validity of modeling regional UD-unmodeled errors on the ground and examines the maximum differences when compared to modeling the errors using ionospheric pierce points (IPP). With data collected at 48 stations from a CORS network in Shanxi Province (SXCORS) in China through May 21, 2010, the efficiency of the presented real-time strategies is validated using IGS final products in a postprocessing mode. The results verify that more than 83 % of SD wide-lane (WL) ambiguity can be fixed with 5 s of observation data, and the average resolution time of all the WL tests is 4.96 s. More than 80 % of SD L1 ambiguity can be fixed within 5 s, and the average resolution time is only 6.66 s. Rovers could gain rapidly centimeter-level absolute positioning service, comparable to standard network RTK. In addition, the URTK method transforms the fixed DD-ambiguities of the reference network into UD-ambiguities, and it does not need to set the base station and base satellite. Since the UD-corrections are modeled for each common visible satellite, it breaks down the connections between stations and satellites of the DD-corrections in the current network RTK. The UD-corrections can be broadcast by the base station and automatically selected and optimized by a rover during the real-time kinematic processing, thus avoiding ambiguity in reinitialization due to the change of reference, so it should be very flexible and useful for a wide range of applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Dai L, Wang J, Rizos C, Han S (2003) Predicting atmospheric biases for real-time ambiguity resolution in GPS/GLONASS reference station networks. J Geodesy 76(11–12):617–628. doi:10.1007/s00190-002-0286-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datta-Barau S, Walter T, Pullen S, Luo M, Blanch J, and Enge P (2002) Using WAAS ionospheric data to estimate LAAS short baseline gradients, proceedings of the 2002 national technical meeting of the institute of navigation, San Diego, CA, January, pp 523–530

  • Dodson AH, Shardlow PJ, Hubbard LCM, Elgered G, Jarlemark POJ (1996) Wet tropospheric effects on precise relative GPS height determination. J Geodesy 70:188–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong DN, Bock Y (1989) Global positioning system network analysis with phase ambiguity resolution applied to crustal deformation studies in California. J Geophys Res 94(B4):3949–3966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dow J, Neilan R, Rizos C (2009) The international GNSS service in a changing landscape of global navigation satellite systems. J Geod 83(3–4):191–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Euler HJ, Schaffrin B (1990) On a measure of the discernibility between different ambiguity solutions in the static-kinematic GPS mode. In: Schwarz KP, Lachapelle G (eds) Kinematic systems in geodesy, surveying and remote sensing, IAG symposium no. 107. Springer, New York, pp 285–295

  • Fang P, Gendt G, Springer T, Mannucci T (2001) IGS near real-time products and their applications. GPS Solutions 4(4):2–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao Y, Chen K (2005) Performance analysis of precise point positioning using real-time orbit and clock products. J Global Position Syst 3(1–2):95–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao Y, Li Z, McLellan JF (1997) Carrier phase based regional area differential GPS for decimeter-level positioning and navigation. In: Proceedings of 10th international technical meeting of the satellite division of US Institute of Navigation, Kansas City, 16–19 September, pp 1305–1313

  • Ge MR, Zou X, Dick G, Jiang WP, Wickert J, Liu JN (2010) An alternative network RTK approach based on undifferenced observation corrections, ION GNSS.

  • Griffiths J, Ray J (2009) On the precision and accuracy of IGS orbits. J Geod 83(3–4):277–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herring TA, King RW, McClusky SC (2006) GAMIT reference manual, GPS analysis at MIT, release 10.3. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge

  • Jin SG, Luo O, Ren C (2010) Effects of physical correlations on long-distance GPS positioning and zenith tropospheric delay estimates. Adv Space Res 46(2):190–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li XX, Zhang XH, Ge MR (2011) Regional reference network augmented precise point positioning for instantaneous ambiguity resolution. J Geodesy 85(3):151–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu JN, Ge MR (2003) PANDA software and its preliminary result of positioning and orbit determination. Wuhan Univ J Nat Sci 8(2):603–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizos C, Han S (2003) Reference station network based RTK systems-concepts and progress. Wuhan Univ J Nat Sci 8(2):566–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocken C, Johnson JM, Braun JJ (2000) Improving GPS surveying with modeled ionospheric corrections. Geophys Res Lett 27(23):3821–3824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi C, Zhao QL, Geng JH, Lou YD, Ge MR, Liu JN (2008) Recent development of PANDA software in GNSS data processing. In: ICEODPA 2008 proceedings of SPIE, vol 7285 72851S.

  • Sibson R (1978) Locally equiangular triangulations. Comput J 21:243–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun H, Cannon ME, Miligard T (1999) Real-time GPS reference network carrier-phase ambiguity resolution. In: Proceedings of ION NTM-99, Institute of Navigation, San Diego, Alexandria, VA.

  • Tang WM, Meng XL, Shi C, Liu JN (2010) Assessment of a long range reference station ambiguity resolution algorithm for network RTK GPS positioning. Surv Rev 42(316):132–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen PJG (1995) The least-squares ambiguity decorrelation adjustment: a method for fast GPS integer ambiguity estimation. J Geodesy 70(1–2):65–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen PJG, Odijk D, Zhang B (2010) PPP-RTK: results of CORS network-based PPP with integer ambiguity resolution. J Aeronaut Astronaut Aviat Ser A 42(4):223–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu JT (1994) Weighted differential GPS method for reducing ephemeris error. Manuscripta Geodaetica 20:1–7

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41004014), the Open Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing, Wuhan University (Grant No. 11P01), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 20110491191) and the 111 project (Grant No. B07037).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weiming Tang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zou, X., Ge, M., Tang, W. et al. URTK: undifferenced network RTK positioning. GPS Solut 17, 283–293 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-012-0277-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-012-0277-5

Keywords

Navigation