GPS Solutions

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 263–270 | Cite as

Ambiguity resolution in precise point positioning with hourly data

  • Jianghui Geng
  • F. N. Teferle
  • C. Shi
  • X. Meng
  • A. H. Dodson
  • J. Liu
Original Article

Abstract

Precise point positioning (PPP) has become a powerful tool for the scientific analysis of Global Positioning System (GPS) measurements. Until recently, ambiguity resolution at a single station in PPP has been considered difficult, due to the receiver- and satellite-dependent uncalibrated hardware delays (UHD). However, recent studies show that if these UHD can be determined accurately in advance within a network of stations, then ambiguity resolution at a single station becomes possible. In this study, the method proposed by Ge et al. J Geod 82(7):389–399, 2007 is adopted with a refinement in which only one single-difference narrow-lane UHD between a pair of satellites is determined within each full pass over a regional network. This study uses the EUREF (European Reference Frame) Permanent Network (EPN) to determine the UHD from Day 245 to 251 in 2007. Then 12 International GNSS Service stations inside the EPN and 15 outside the EPN are used to conduct ambiguity resolution in hourly PPP. It is found that the mean positioning accuracy in all hourly solutions for the stations inside the EPN is improved from (3.8, 1.5, 2.8) centimeters to (0.5, 0.5, 1.4) centimeters for the East, North and Up components, respectively. For the stations outside the EPN, some of which are over 2,000 km away from the nearest EPN stations, the mean positioning accuracy in the East, North and Up directions still achieves (0.6, 0.6, 2.0) centimeters, respectively, when the EPN-based UHD are applied to these stations. These results demonstrate that ambiguity resolution at a single station can significantly improve the positioning accuracy in hourly PPP. Particularly, UHD can be even applied to a station which is up to thousands of kilometers from the UHD-determination network, potentially showing a great advantage over current network-based GPS augmentation systems. Therefore, it is feasible and beneficial for the operators of GPS regional networks and providers of PPP-based online services to provide these UHD estimates as an additional product.

Keywords

Ambiguity resolution Precise point positioning Hourly solution Uncalibrated hardware delay 

References

  1. Bar-Sever YE, Kroger PM, Borjesson JA (1998) Estimating horizontal gradients of tropospheric path delay with a single GPS receiver. J Geophys Res 103(B3):5019–5035. doi:10.1029/97JB03534 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blewitt G (1989) Carrier phase ambiguity resolution for the global positioning system applied to geodetic baselines up to 2,000 km. J Geophys Res 94(B8):10187–10203. doi:10.1029/JB094iB08p10187 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen K (2004) Real-time precise point positioning and its potential applications. In: Proceedings of 17th Int Tech Meet Satellite Div Inst Navigation GNSS 2004 21-24 September, Long Beach, CA, USAGoogle Scholar
  4. Collins P (2008) Isolating and estimating undifferenced GPS integer ambiguities. In: Proceedings of Inst Navigation National Tech Meet 28–30 January, San Diego, CA, USAGoogle Scholar
  5. Dong D, Bock Y (1989) Global positioning system network analysis with phase ambiguity resolution applied to crustal deformation studies in California. J Geophys Res 94(B4):3949–3966. doi:10.1029/JB094iB04p03949 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Euler HJ, Schaffrin B (1990) On a measure of the discernibility between different ambiguity solutions in the static-kinematic GPS mode. In: Proceedings of kinematic systems in geodesy, surveying and remote sensing, IAG Symposium 107, 10–13 September, Berlin, Heidelberg, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Gabor MJ, Nerem RS (1999) GPS carrier phase ambiguity resolution using satellite-satellite single difference. In: Proceedings of 12th Int Tech Meet Satellite Div Inst Navigation GPS 99, 14–17 September, Nashville, TN, USAGoogle Scholar
  8. Ge M, Gendt G, Dick G, Zhang FP (2005) Improving carrier-phase ambiguity resolution in global GPS network solutions. J Geod 79(1–3):103–110. doi:10.1007/s00190-005-0447-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ge M, Gendt G, Rothacher M, Shi C, Liu J (2007) Resolution of GPS carrier-phase ambiguities in precise point positioning (PPP) with daily observations. J Geod 82(7):389–399. doi:10.1007/s00190-007-0187-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Geng J, Shi C, Zhao Q, Liu J (2006) Integrated adjustment of LEO and GPS in precision orbit determination. In: VI Hotine-Marussi symposium on theoretical and computational geodesy, Springer, Berlin. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-74584-6_20
  11. Ghoddousi-Fard R, Dare P (2006) Online GPS processing services: an initial study. GPS Solut 10(1):12–20. doi:10.1007/s10291-005-0147-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Han S (1997) Quality-control issues relating to instantaneous ambiguity resolution for real-time GPS kinematic positioning. J Geod 71(6):351–361. doi:10.1007/s001900050103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kouba J (2005) A possible detection of the 26 December 2004 great Sumatra-Andaman islands earthquake with solutions products of the international GNSS service. Stud Geophys Geod 49(4):463–483. doi:10.1007/s11200-005-0022-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kouba J, Héroux P (2001) Precise point positioning using IGS orbit and clock products. GPS Solut 5(2):12–28. doi:10.1007/PL00012883 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Laurichesse D, Mercier F (2007) Integer ambiguity resolution on undifferenced GPS phase measurements and its application to PPP. In: Proceedings of 20th Int Tech Meet Satellite Div Inst Navigation GNSS 2007, 25–28 Semptember, Fort Worth, TX, USAGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu J, Ge M (2003) PANDA software and its preliminary result of positioning and orbit determination. J Nat Sci Wuhan Univ 8(2B):603–609. doi:10.1007/BF02899825 Google Scholar
  17. McCarthy DD, Petit G (2004) IERS Conventions (2003). IERS technical note No. 32. Verlag des Bundes für Kartographie und Geodäsie, Frankfurt am Main, 127 ppGoogle Scholar
  18. Melbourne WG (1985) The case for ranging in GPS-based gedetic systems. In: Proceedings of first international symposium on precise positioning with the global positioning system, Rockville, 15–19 April, MD, USA, pp 373–386Google Scholar
  19. Soler T, Michalak P, Weston ND, Snay RA, Foote RH (2006) Accuracy of OPUS solutions for 1- to 4-h observing sessions. GPS Solut 10(1):45–55. doi:10.1007/s10291-005-0007-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Teferle FN, Orliac EJ, Bingley RM (2007) An assessment of Bernese GPS software precise point positioning using IGS final products for global site velocities. GPS Solut 11(3):205–213. doi:10.1007/s10291-006-0051-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tétreault P, Kouba J, Héroux P, Legree P (2005) CSRS-PPP: an internet service for GPS user access to the Canadian Spatial Reference Frame. Geomatica 59(1):17–28Google Scholar
  22. Teunissen PJG (1994) A new method for fast carrier phase ambiguity estimation. In: Proceedings of IEEE position, location and navigation symposium, Las Vegas, NV, April 11–15, pp 562–573Google Scholar
  23. Wübbena G (1985) Software developments for geodetic positioning with GPS using TI-4100 code and carrier measurements. In: Proceedings of first international symposium on precise positioning with the global positioning system, Rockville, 15–19 April, MD, USA, pp 403–412Google Scholar
  24. Zumberge JF, Heflin MB, Jefferson DC, Watkins MM, Webb FH (1997) Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks. J Geophys Res 102(B3):5005–5017. doi:10.1029/96JB03860 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jianghui Geng
    • 1
  • F. N. Teferle
    • 1
  • C. Shi
    • 2
  • X. Meng
    • 1
  • A. H. Dodson
    • 1
  • J. Liu
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Engineering Surveying and Space GeodesyUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
  2. 2.GNSS CenterWuhan UniversityWuhanPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations