Advertisement

GPS Solutions

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 21–28 | Cite as

On the probability density function of the GNSS ambiguity residuals

Original Article

Abstract

Integer GNSS ambiguity resolution involves estimation and validation of the unknown integer carrier phase ambiguities. A problem then is that the classical theory of linear estimation does not apply to the integer GPS model, and hence rigorous validation is not possible when use is made of the classical results. As with the classical theory, a first step for being able to validate the integer GPS model is to make use of the residuals and their probabilistic properties. The residuals quantify the inconsistency between data and model, while their probabilistic properties can be used to measure the significance of the inconsistency. Existing validation methods are often based on incorrect assumptions with respect to the probabilistic properties of the parameters involved. In this contribution we will present and evaluate the joint probability density function (PDF) of the multivariate integer GPS carrier phase ambiguity residuals. The residuals and their properties depend on the integer estimation principle used. Since it is known that the integer least-squares estimator is the optimal choice from the class of admissible integer estimators, we will only focus on the PDF of the ambiguity residuals for this estimator. Unfortunately the PDF cannot be evaluated exactly. It will therefore be shown how to obtain a good approximation. The evaluation will be completed by some examples.

Keywords

Probability Density Function GNSS Ambiguity Resolution Joint Probability Density Function Lambda Method 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Boon F, Ambrosius B (1997) Results of real-time applications of the LAMBDA method in GPS based aircraft landings. Proceedings KIS97, pp 339–345Google Scholar
  2. Cox DB, Brading JDW (1999) Integration of LAMBDA ambiguity resolution with Kalman filter for relative navigation of spacecraft. Proceedings ION NTM-99, pp 739–745Google Scholar
  3. De Jonge PJ, Tiberius CCJM (1996) The LAMBDA method for integer ambiguity estimation: implementation aspects. Delft Geodetic Computing Centre, LGR series, no.12, Delft University of Technology, 49 ppGoogle Scholar
  4. Odijk D (2002) Fast precise GPS positioning in the presence of ionospheric delays. Ph.D. thesis, Publications on Geodesy, 52, Netherlands Geodetic Commission, DelftGoogle Scholar
  5. Peng HM, Chang FR, Wang LS (1999), Attitude determination using GPS carrier phase and compass data, Proceedings ION-NTM-99, pp 727–732Google Scholar
  6. Teunissen PJG (1993) Least squares estimation of the integer GPS ambiguities. In: Invited lecture, section IV theory and methodology, IAG General Meeting, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  7. Teunissen PJG (1995) The least-squares ambiguity decorrelation adjustment: a method for fast GPS integer ambiguity estimation. J Geodesy 70:65–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Teunissen PJG (1999) An optimality property of the integer least-squares estimator. J Geodesy, 73, 587–593. DOI 10.1007/s001900050269Google Scholar
  9. Teunissen PJG (2002) The parameter distributions of the integer GPS model. J Geodesy 76:41–48. DOI 10.1007/s001900100223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Teunissen PJG (2003a) Integer aperture GNSS ambiguity resolution. Arti Satellites 38(3):79–88Google Scholar
  11. Teunissen PJG (2003b) Towards a unified theory of GNSS ambiguity resolution. J Glob Position Sys 2(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Teunissen PJG (2004) Penalized GNSS ambiguity resolution. J Geodesy, 78:235–244. DOI 10.1007/s00190-004-0393-2Google Scholar
  13. Teunissen PJG (2005) Optimal integer aperture estimation. Artif Satelli (submitted)Google Scholar
  14. Verhagen S, Teunissen PJG (2004) PDF evaluation of the ambiguity residuals. In: Sansò F (ed) V Hotine-Marussi symposium on mathematical geodesy. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, Vol. 127, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Delft Institute of Earth Observation and Space SystemsDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations