Skip to main content
Log in

Modelling of differential single difference receiver clock bias for precise positioning

  • Original Article
  • Published:
GPS Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A receiver hardware delay should be seriously considered for time-transfer and determination of ionospheric delay corrections for wide area differential GPS positioning. A receiver hardware delay does not generally effect the common geo-position application, as suitable differences of observations are used, or equivalently, clock error parameters are introduced, epoch-wise, that also absorb the delays. This paper investigates the behavior of inter-frequency (or observation-type) receiver hardware delays by using a single difference (SD) model, which estimates the receiver delay along with the receiver clock error (and SD ambiguities of a reference satellite with carrier phase observations) for zero and short baselines. The purpose of this paper is to model the between-observation-type delays for the purpose of precise positioning, under practical circumstances. The focus is on data series of differential SD receiver clock biases, since they reflect the behavior of receiver hardware delays with time. A simple linear regression of the data series is employed to study the behavior, and test statistics are employed to assess both the significance of the parameters and the observations’ fit for the linear regression. The statistical analysis results indicate that almost all inter-observation type receiver delays can be modeled as the sum of a constant (offset) and a constant rate of change (slope). The analysis shows that the differential receiver delay is generally at the mm- to cm-level on phase, while at the dm-level on code for the equipment used in the experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baarda W (1973) S-transformations and criterion matrices. Netherlands Geodetic Commission. Publications on Geodesy. New Series vol 5, no 1, Delft

  • Dach R, Beutler G, Hugentobler U, Schaer S, Schildknecht T, Springer T, Dudle G, Prost L (2003) Time transfer using GPS carrier phase: error propagation and results. J Geodesy 77:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong CD (1999) Quality control and precise kinematic GPS positioning – theory and applications. Presented at Shallow Survey 99, Sydney, Australia, Oct. 18–20, 1999, 18 pp

  • Gao Y, Heroux P, Kouba J (1994): Estimation of GPS receiver and satellite L1/L2 signal delay biases using data from CACS. Proceedings of International Symposium on Kinematic Systems in Geodesy, Geomatics and Navigation, Banff, Alberta, Canada, August 20–September 2, 1994, pp 109–116

  • Gao Y, Heroux P, Liao X, Lahaye F, Beck N, Olynik M (1999) GPS instrumental bias between receivers. Proceedings ION 55th Annual Meeting, 28–30 June 1999, Cambridge, MA, pp 209–216

  • Gao Y, Lahaye F, Heroux P, Liao X, Beck N, Olynik M (2001) Modeling and estimation of C1-P1 bias in GPS receivers. J Geodesy 74:621–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurtner W (1994) RINEX: Receiver Independent Exchange format. GPS World 5(6):48–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch K-R (1999) Parameter estimation and hypothesis testing in linear models, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  • Larson KM, Levine J (1999) Carrier-phase time transfer, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol 46, no 4, July 1999, pp 1001–1012

  • Ray J, Senior K (2002) New IGS clock products: a global time transfer assessment, GPS World, vol 13, no 11, November 2002, pp 45–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen PJG (2002) Testing theory: an introduction. Series on Mathematical Geodesy and Positioning, Delft University Press, Delft, The Netherlands, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiberius CCJM (1999) The GPS data weight matrix: what are the issues? Proceedings of National Technical Meetings & 19th Biannual Guidance Test Symposium of ION 1999, pp 219–227, January 25–27, 1999, San Diego, CA, USA, pp 219–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson BD, Mannucci AJ (1993) Instrumental biases in ionospheric measurements derived from GPS data. Proceedings of ION GPS-93, Salt Lake City, UT, September 22–24, 1993, pp 1343–1351

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first author was supported by the DELTA (Dutch Education: Learning at Top-level Abroad) scholarship from NUFFIC (Netherlands organization for international cooperation in higher education) of the Netherlands. Valuable and helpful comments were made by Dr. Jim Ray and an anonymous reviewer. Their contributions are highly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xianglin Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, X., Tiberius, C. & de Jong, K. Modelling of differential single difference receiver clock bias for precise positioning. GPS Solutions 7, 209–221 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-003-0079-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-003-0079-x

Keywords

Navigation