Advertisement

Review of World Economics

, Volume 152, Issue 1, pp 177–213 | Cite as

Are stricter investment rules contagious? Host country competition for foreign direct investment through international agreements

  • Eric Neumayer
  • Peter NunnenkampEmail author
  • Martin Roy
Original Paper

Abstract

We argue that competitive diffusion is a driver of the trend toward international investment agreements with stricter investment rules, namely defensive moves of developing countries concerned about foreign direct investment (FDI) diversion in favor of competing host countries. Accounting for spatial dependence in the formation of bilateral investment treaties and preferential trade agreements that contain investment provisions, we find that the increase in agreements with stricter provisions on investor-to-state dispute settlement and pre-establishment national treatment is a contagious process. Specifically, a developing country is more likely to sign an agreement with weak investment provisions if other developing countries that compete for FDI from the same developed country have previously signed agreements with similarly weak provisions. Conversely, contagion in agreements with strong provisions exclusively derives from agreements with strong provisions that other FDI-competing developing countries have previously signed with a specific developed source country of FDI.

Keywords

Bilateral investment treaties Preferential trade agreements Investment provisions Competition for FDI Spatial dependence 

JEL classification

F21 F53 

References

  1. Allee, T., & Peinhardt, C. (2010). Delegating differences: Bilateral investment treaties and bargaining over dispute resolution provisions. International Studies Quarterly, 54(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allee, T., & Peinhardt, C. (2011). Contingent credibility: The reputational effects of investment treaty disputes on foreign direct investment. International Organization, 65(3), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allee, T., & Peinhardt, C. (2014). Evaluating three explanations for the design of bilateral investment treaties. World Politics, 66(1), 47–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baccini, L., & Dür, A. (2012). The new regionalism and policy interdependence. British Journal of Political Science, 42(1), 57–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baldwin, R. (1993). A domino theory of regionalism. (NBER Working Paper 4465). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  6. Baldwin, R. (1997). The causes of regionalism. World Economy, 20(7), 865–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baldwin, R., & Jaimovich, D. (2012). Are free trade agreements contagious? Journal of International Economics, 88(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barthel, F., Busse, M., & Neumayer, E. (2010). The impact of double taxation treaties on foreign direct investment: Evidence from large dyadic panel data. Contemporary Economic Policy, 28(3), 366–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barthel, F., & Neumayer, E. (2012). Competing for scarce foreign capital: Spatial dependence in the diffusion of double taxation treaties. International Studies Quarterly, 56(4), 645–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beck, N., Katz, J. N., & Tucker, R. (1998). Taking time seriously: Time-series-cross-section analysis with a binary dependent variable. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 1260–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Berger, A., Busse, M., Nunnenkamp, P., & Roy, M. (2011). More stringent BITs, less ambiguous effects on FDI? Not a bit! Economics Letters, 112(3), 270–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Berger, A., Busse, M., Nunnenkamp, P., & Roy, M. (2013). Do trade and investment agreements lead to more FDI? Accounting of key provisions inside the black box. International Economics and Economic Policy, 10(2), 247–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bergstrand, J. H., & Egger, P. (2013). What determines BITs? Journal of International Economics, 90(1), 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Büthe, T., & Milner, H. V. (2014). Foreign direct investment and institutional diversity in trade agreements: Credibility, commitment, and economic flows in the developing world, 1971–2007. World Politics, 66(1), 88–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cameron, C., Gelbach, J., & Miller, D. (2011). Robust inference with multiway clustering. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 29(2), 238–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cleves, M., Gutierrez, R. G., Gould, W., & Marchenko, Y. V. (2010). An introduction to survival analysis using stata (3rd ed.). College Station: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  17. Dür, A., Baccini, L., & Elsig, M. (2014). The design of international trade agreements: Introducing a new dataset. Review of International Organizations, 9(3), 353–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Elkins, Z., Guzman, A. T., & Simmons, B. A. (2006). Competing for capital: The diffusion of bilateral investment treaties, 1960–2000. International Organization, 60(4), 811–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guzman, A. T. (1997). Why LDCs sign treaties that hurt them: Explaining the popularity of bilateral investment treaties. Virginia Journal of International Law, 38, 639–688.Google Scholar
  20. Henderson, D. (1999). The MAI affair: A story and its lessons. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
  21. Hoekman, B., & Newfarmer, R. (2005). Preferential trade agreements, investment disciplines and investment flows. Journal of World Trade, 39(5), 949–973.Google Scholar
  22. IMF (2003). Foreign direct investment statistics: How countries measure FDI, 2001. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  23. IMF (2013). Sixth edition of the IMF’s balance of payments and international investment position manual (BPM6). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund (http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/bop/2007/bopman6.htm).
  24. IMF (2014). Balance of payments and international investment position compilation guide. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund (https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/bop/2007/bop6comp.htm).
  25. Jandhyala, S., Henisz, W. J., & Mansfield, E. D. (2011). Three waves of BITs: The global diffusion of foreign investment policy. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 55(6), 1047–1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kerner, A. (2009). Why should I believe you? The costs and consequences of bilateral investment treaties. International Studies Quarterly, 53(1), 73–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Koremenos, B. (2007). If only half of international agreements have dispute resolution provisions, which half needs explaining? Journal of Legal Studies, 36, 189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lipsey, R. E. (2001). Foreign direct investment and the operations of multinational firms: Concepts, history, and data. (NBER Working Paper 8665). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  29. Lupu, Y., & Poast, P. (2013). Are bilateral investment treaties really bilateral? Mimeo. Available at: https://ncgg.princeton.edu/IPES/2013/papers/F900_rm2.pdf. Accessed Jan 2014.
  30. Mansfield, E., & Milner, H. (2012). Votes, vetoes, and the political economy of international trade agreements. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Mansfield, E., Milner, H., & Pevehouse, J. (2008). Democracy, veto players and the depth of regional integration. World Economy, 31(1), 67–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Milner, H. (2014). Introduction: The global economy, FDI, and the regime for investment. World Politics, 66(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Neumayer, E., & Plümper, T. (2010). Spatial effects in dyadic data. International Organization, 64(1), 145–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. OECD (2006). Novel features in recent OECD bilateral investment treaties. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. OECD (2008). OECD benchmark definition of foreign direct investment (4th ed.). Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
  36. Poulsen, L. S., & Aisbett, E. (2013). When the claim hits: Bilateral investment treaties and bounded rational learning. World Politics, 65(2), 273–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Roy, M. (2011). Democracy and the political economy of multilateral commitments on trade in services. Journal of World Trade, 45(6), 1157–1180.Google Scholar
  38. Sachs, L. E., & Sauvant, K. P. (2009). BITs, DTTs, and FDI flows: An overview. In K. P. Sauvant & L. E. Sachs (Eds.), The effect of treaties on foreign direct investment: Bilateral investment treaties, double taxation treaties, and investment flows (pp. 28–62). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Salacuse, J. W. (2010). The emerging global regime for investment. Harvard International Law Journal, 51(2), 427–473.Google Scholar
  40. Sauvant, K. P., & Sachs, L. E. (Eds.). (2009). The effect of treaties on foreign direct investment: Bilateral investment treaties, double taxation treaties, and investment flows. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Simmons, B. A. (2014). Bargaining over BITs, arbitrating awards: The regime for protection and promotion of international investment. World Politics, 66(1), 12–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Swenson, D. L. (2005). Why do developing countries sign BITs? U.C. Davis Journal of International Law and Policy, 12(1), 131–155.Google Scholar
  43. Tobin, J., & Busch, M. L. (2010). A BIT is better than a lot: Bilateral investment treaties and preferential trade agreements. World Politics, 62(1), 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tobin, J., & Rose-Ackerman, S. (2011). When BITs have some bite: The political-economic environment for bilateral investment treaties. Review of International Organizations, 6(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. UNCTAD (2009). Training manual on statistics for FDI and the operations of TNCs, Vol 1: FDI flows and stocks. New York and Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
  46. UNCTAD (2013). World investment report 2013. New York and Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
  47. Yackee, J. (2009). Do BITS really work? Revisiting the empirical link between investment treaties and foreign direct investment. In K. P. Sauvant & L. E. Sachs (Eds.), The effect of treaties on foreign direct investment: Bilateral investment treaties, double taxation treaties, and investment flows (pp. 379–394). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kiel Institute 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kiel Institute for the World EconomyKielGermany
  2. 2.London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE)LondonUK
  3. 3.Port Vila Vanuatu

Personalised recommendations