Skip to main content

Financial development, exporting and firm heterogeneity in Chile

Review of World Economics volume 149, pages 183–207 (2013)Cite this article

Abstract

Using plant-level data from the manufacturing sector of Chile for the period 1990–2000, this paper examines the effect of financial development on the probability of exporting at the plant level, with a special focus on the heterogeneous responses of plants with different characteristics. The main results are that an improvement in financial development increases the probability of exporting of more productive plants and those with foreign ownership operating in manufacturing sectors that are more dependent on external finance. Our estimates also show that financial development does not appear to improve the probability of exporting for relatively smaller and younger plants. This result suggests that, at least for the case of exporting in Chile, smaller and younger plants are not necessarily more likely to benefit than larger and older plants from improvements in access to credit.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Notes

  1. For a recent survey, see Wagner (2012).

  2. Recent papers using a similar identification strategy with microeconomic data are Jaud and Kukenova (2011) which shows that agri-food products that require more external finance survive longer in foreign markets if the exporting country is more financially developed, and Tsoukas (2011) which presents evidence that stock market development is particularly beneficial to large firms.

  3. Although a plant is not necessarily a firm, in the case of Chilean manufacturing, most firms have only one plant. Thus, the paper will refer to plants and firms interchangeable.

  4. Most of the plants with foreign ownership have actually majority foreign ownership (over 50 % foreign ownership).

  5. Total factor productivity is measured as the residual of a regression that estimates a Cobb–Douglas production function for each 3-digit industry using the method proposed by Olley and Pakes (1996) and later modified by Levinsohn and Petrin (2003), which corrects the simultaneity bias associated with the fact that productivity is not observed by the econometrician but it may be observed by the firm. In some cases, the production functions were estimated at the 2-digit level due to the small number of observations of some industries at the 3-digit level of disaggregation.

  6. See, for example, Roberts and Tybout (1997), Castellani (2002), Bernard and Jensen (2004), and Greenaway, et al. (2007).

  7. These marginal effects consider the results of column (4) in Table 3 and only the parameters that are statistically significant. In this case, the marginal effects are evaluated at the average of the variable foreign ownership. Given that the econometric results are very similar to those in Table 4 we do not present the effects corresponding to those results.

  8. The high and low financially dependent industries are classified as in the previous exercise. In this case, the marginal effects are evaluated at the average of TFP.

References

  • Aghion, P., Fally, T., & Scarpetta, S. (2007). Credit constraints as a barrier to the entry and post-entry growth of firms. Economic Policy, 22(52), 731–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, R., & López, R. A. (2005). Exporting and performance: Evidence from Chilean plants. Canadian Journal of Economics, 38(4), 1384–1400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, T. (2002). Financial development and international trade: Is there a link? Journal of International Economics, 57(1), 107–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, T. (2003). Financial dependence and international trade. Review of International Economics, 11(2), 296–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, T., Demirgüς-Kunt, A., Laeven, L., & Maksimovic, V. (2006). The determinants of financial obstacles. Journal of International Money and Finance, 25(6), 932–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, T., Demirgüς-Kunt, A., & Levine, R. (2010). Financial institutions and markets across countries and over time: The updated financial development and structure database. World Bank Economic Review, 24(1), 77–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellone, F., Musso, P., Nesta, L., & Schiavo, S. (2010). Financial constraints and firm export behaviour. The World Economy, 33(3), 347–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, N., & Héricourt, J. (2009). Financial factors and the margins of trade: Evidence from cross-country firm-level data. Journal of Development Economics, 93(2), 206–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, A. B., & Jensen, J. B. (1999). Exceptional exporter performance: Cause, effect, or both? Journal of International Economics, 47(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, A. B., & Jensen, J. B. (2004). Why some firms export. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(2), 561–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, M. (2003). Financial Contractibility and Asset Hardness (Working Paper). Los Angeles: University of California.

  • Braun, M., & Raddatz, C. (2008). The Politics of financial development: Evidence from trade liberalization. The Journal of Finance, 63(3), 1469–1508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castellani, D. (2002). Export behavior and productivity growth: Evidence from Italian Manufacturing Firms. Review of World Economics/Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 138(4), 605–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaney, T. (2005). Liquidity Constrained Exporters (Working Paper). Chicago: University of Chicago.

  • Desai, M., Foley, C. F., & Hines, J. (2004). A multinational perspective on capital structure choice and internal capital markets. Journal of Finance, 59(6), 2451–2488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desai, M., Foley, C. F., & Forbes, K. J. (2008). Financial constraints and growth: Multinational and local firm responses to currency depreciations. Review of Financial Studies, 21(6), 2857–2888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Do, T., & Levchenko, A. (2007). Comparative advantage, demand for external finance, and financial development. Journal of Financial Economics, 86(3), 796–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenaway, D., Guariglia, A., & Kneller, R. (2007). Financial factors and exporting decisions. Journal of International Economics, 73(2), 377–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. (1976). The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5(4), 475–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaud, M., & Kukenova, M. (2011). Financial development and survival of African agri-food exports (Policy research working paper 5649). Washington, DC: World Bank.

  • Kasahara, H., & Rodrigue, J. (2008). Does the use of imported intermediates increase productivity? Plant-level evidence. Journal of Development Economics, 87(1), 106–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, R. G., & Levine, R. (1993). Finance and growth: Schumpeter might be right. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 717–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, R. (1997). Financial development and economic growth: Views and agenda. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(2), 688–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, R., Loayza, N., & Beck, T. (2000). Financial intermediation and growth: Causality and causes. Journal of Monetary Economics, 46(1), 31–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinsohn, J., & Petrin, A. (2003). Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. Review of Economic Studies, 70(2), 317–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López, R. A., & Yadav, N. (2010). Imports of intermediate inputs and spillover effects: Evidence from Chilean plants. Journal of Development Studies, 46(8), 1385–1403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manova, K. (2010). Credit Constraints, Heterogeneous Firms, and International Trade (Working Paper). Stanford: Stanford University.

  • Melitz, M. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695–1725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minetti, R., & Zhu, S. C. (2011). Credit constraints and firm export: Microeconomic evidence from Italy. Journal of International Economics, 83(2), 109–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olley, G. S., & Pakes, A. (1996). The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica, 64(6), 1263–1297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, R. G., & Zingales, L. (1998). Financial development and growth. American Economic Review, 88(3), 559–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, M., & Tybout, J. (1997). An empirical model of sunk costs and the decision to export. American Economic Review, 87(4), 545–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roodman, D. (2009). A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 135–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, S. (2011). Firms survival and financial development: Evidence form a panel of emerging markets. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(7), 1736–1752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J. (2012). International trade and firm performance: A survey of empirical studies since 2006. Review of World Economics/Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 148(2), 235–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Beck, T., & Honohan, P. (2008). Finance for all? Policies and pitfalls in expanding access (A World Bank Policy Research Report). Washington, DC: The World Bank.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Rolando Campusano for excellent research assistance, and two anonymous referees and participants at the 6th Workshop of the International Study Group on Exports and Productivity (ISGEP) held at Leuphana University, Lüneburg, Germany, on September 28–30, 2011 for helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper. Alvarez thanks also the Millennium Science Initiative (Project NS 100017 “Centro Intelis”) for their financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Chile, Santiago, Chile

    Roberto Alvarez

  2. International Business School, Brandeis University, Mail Stop - MS 032, Sachar International Center, 415 South Street, Waltham, MA, 02454, USA

    Ricardo A. López

Authors
  1. Roberto Alvarez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ricardo A. López
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ricardo A. López.

About this article

Cite this article

Alvarez, R., López, R.A. Financial development, exporting and firm heterogeneity in Chile. Rev World Econ 149, 183–207 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-012-0143-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-012-0143-0

Keywords

  • Exporting
  • Financial development
  • Credit constraints
  • Plant-level data
  • Chile

JEL Classification

  • F14
  • O16
  • O54