Skip to main content
Log in

Privatization, Foreign Acquisition and the Motives for FDI in Eastern Europe

  • Published:
Review of World Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper examines the motives for FDI in Eastern Europe by analysing foreign entry by acquisition facilitated by privatization programmes. Firm-level characteristics encouraging entry through their effect on expected profits, as well as industry level determinants are considered. The data are drawn from the list of the 500 largest companies in Polish manufacturing and span privatizations between 1993 and 1998. The results point to market-seeking rather than resource-seeking motives behind the location decisions of foreign investors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aleksandrova, A., and J. Lubys (2004). Application of the Structure-Conduct-Performance Paradigm in a Transition Economy: Explaining Reported Profitability of the Largest Latvian Firms. Riga Working Papers 63. Stockholm School of Economics, Riga.

  2. Altomonte, C., and L. Resmini (2001). Multinational Corporations as Catalyst for Industrial Development: The Case of Poland. Working Paper 368. The William Davidson Institute, Ann Arbor, Mich.

  3. Barbosa, N., P. Guimaraes, and D. Woodward (2004). Foreign Firm Entry in an Open Economy: The Case of Portugal. Applied Economics 36 (5): 465–472.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bevan, A., and S. Estrin (2004). The Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment into European Transition Economies. Journal of Comparative Economics 32 (4): 775–787.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boudier-Bensebaa, F. (2005). Agglomeration Economies and Location Choice: Foreign Direct Investment in Hungary. Economics of Transition 13 (4): 605–628.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Buch, C., J. Kleinert, A. Lipponer, and F. Toubal (2005). Determinants and Effects of Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from German Firm-Level Data. Economic Policy 20 (41): 51–110.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Carlin, W., and P. Aghion (1996). Restructuring Outcomes and the Evolution of Ownership Patterns in Central and Eastern Europe. Economics of Transition 4 (2): 371–388.

  8. Carstensen, K., and F. Toubal (2004). Foreign Direct Investment in Central and Eastern European Countries: A Dynamic Panel Analysis. Journal of Comparative Economics 32 (1): 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Caves, R. E. (1996). The Multinational Enterprise: An Economic Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  10. Chakrabarti, A. (2001). The Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: Sensitivity Analyses of Cross-Country Regressions. Kyklos 54 (1): 89–114.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Clausing, K., and C. Dorobantu (2005). Re-Entering Europe: Does European Union Candidacy Boost Foreign Direct Investment? Economics of Transition 13 (1): 77–103.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Conyon, M., S. Girma, S. Thompson, and P. Wright (2002). The Productivity and Wage Effects of Foreign Acquisition in the United Kingdom. Journal of Industrial Economics 50 (1): 85–102.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Damijan, J., and M. Knell (2005). How Important Is Trade and Foreign Ownership in Closing the Technology Gap? Evidence from Estonia and Slovenia. Review of World Economics/Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 141 (2): 271–295.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Disdier, A., and T. Mayer (2004). How Different Is Eastern Europe? Structure and Determinants of Location Choices by French Firms in Eastern and Western Europe. Journal of Comparative Economics 32 (2): 280–296.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Djankov, S., and B. Hoekman (2000). Foreign Investment and Productivity Growth in Czech Enterprises. The World Bank Economic Review 14 (1): 49–64.

  16. Driffield, N. (2002). Determinants of Inward Investment in the UK: A Panel Analysis. Applied Economics 34 (3): 555–560.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dunning, J. H. (1977). Trade, Location of Economic Activities and the Multinational Enterprise: A Search for an Eclectic Approach. In B. Ohlin, P. O. Hesselborn, and P. M. Wijkman (eds.), The International Allocation of Economic Activity. London: Macmillan.

  18. Dunning, J. H. (1988). The Eclectic Paradigm of International Business: A Restatement and Some Possible Extensions. Journal of International Business Studies 19 (1): 1–31.

  19. Dunning, J. H. (1998). Location and the Multinational Enterprise: A Neglected Factor? Journal of International Business Studies 29 (1): 45–66.

    Google Scholar 

  20. EBRD (1994). Transition Report. London: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.

  21. Feliciano, Z., and R. E. Lipsey (2002). Foreign Entry into U.S. Manufacturing by Takeovers and the Creation of New Firms. NBER Working Paper 9122. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass.

  22. Fukao, K., K. Ito, H. G. Kwon, and M. Takizawa (2006). Cross-Border Acquisitions and Target Firms’ Performance: Evidence from Japanese Firm-Level Data. Centre for Economic Institutions Working Paper Series 2006-18. Hitotsubashi University, Tokyo.

  23. Girma, S., and H. Görg (2007). Multinationals’ Productivity Advantage: Scale or Technology? Economic Inquiry 45 (2): 350–362.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Girma, S., R. Kneller, and M. Pisu (2005). Acquisition FDI and the Export Intensity of Multinational Firms. GEP Discussion Paper 2005/01. University of Nottingham.

  25. Girma, S., S. Thompson, and P. Wright (2006). International Acquisitions, Domestic Competition and Firm Performance. International Journal of the Economics of Business 13 (3): 335–349.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Görg, H., A. Hijzen, and B. Muraközy (2006). The Productivity Spillover Potential of Foreign-Owned Firms: Firm-Level Evidence for Hungary. GEP Discussion Paper 2006/08. University of Nottingham.

  27. Holland, D., M. Saas, V. Benacek, and M. Gronicki (2000). The Determinants and Impact of FDI in Central and Eastern Europe: A Comparison of Survey and Econometric Evidence. Transnational Corporations 9 (3): 163–212.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jarosz, M. (1995). Foreign Capital and Privatization. Warsaw: PAN (in Polish).

  29. Kinoshita, Y., and N. Campos (2003). Why Does FDI Go Where It Goes? New Evidence from the Transition Economies. Working Paper 573. The William Davidson Institute, Ann Arbor, Mich.

  30. Lankes, H.-P., and T. Venables (1996). Foreign Direct Investment in Economic Transition: The Changing Pattern of Investment. Economics of Transition 4 (2): 331–347.

  31. Levy, B. (1998). The Determinants of Manufacturing Ownership in Less Developed Countries. Journal of Development Economics 28: 217–231.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Louri, L. (2001). Entry through Acquisition: Determinants of Multinational Firm Choices. Review of Industrial Organisation 19 (2): 199–209.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Markusen, J. (1995). The Boundary of Multinational Enterprises and the Theories of International Trade. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 (2): 169–189.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Markusen, J. (2002). Integrating Multinational Firms into International Economics. NBER Research Summary, Winter 2001/02. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass.

  35. Markusen, J., and K. Maskus (1999). Multinational Firms: Reconciling Theory and Evidence. NBER Working Paper 7163. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass.

  36. Markusen, J., and K. Maskus (2002). Discriminating among Alternative Theories of the Multinational Enterprise. Review of International Economics 10 (4): 694–707.

  37. Mencinger, J. (2003). Does Foreign Direct Investment Always Enhance Economic Growth? Kyklos 56 (4): 491–508.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mickiewicz, T., and M. Baltowski (2003). All Roads Lead to Outside Ownership: Polish Piecemeal Privatization. In D. Parker and D. Saal (eds.), International Handbook on Privatization. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

  39. Piscitello, L., and Rabbiosi L. (2005). The Impact of FDI on Local Companies’ Labour Productivity: Evidence from the Italian Case. International Journal of the Economics of Business 12 (1): 35–51.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Powers, D., and Y. Xie (2000). Statistical Methods for Categorical Data Analysis. San Diego: Academic Press.

  41. Resmini, L. (2000). The Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in the CEECs. Economics of Transition 8 (3): 665–689.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Sabirianova, K., J. Svejnar, and K. Terrell (2005). Foreign Investment, Corporate Ownership, and Development: Are Firms in Emerging Markets Catching up to the World Standard? Working Paper 734. The William Davidson Institute, Ann Arbor, Mich.

  43. Sinn, H., and A. Weichenrieder (1997). Foreign Direct Investment, Political Resentment and the Privatization Process in Eastern Europe. Economic Policy 12 (24): 178–213.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Uminski, S. (2001). Foreign Capital in the Privatization of Poland. Transnational Corporations 10 (3): 75–94.

    Google Scholar 

  45. UNCTAD (1998). World Investment Report: Trends and Determinants. Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.

  46. UNCTAD (2000). World Investment Report: Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions and Development. Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara M. Roberts.

Additional information

JEL no.

F23, L33, P31

About this article

Cite this article

Roberts, B., Thompson, S. & Mikolajczyk, K. Privatization, Foreign Acquisition and the Motives for FDI in Eastern Europe. Rev World Econ 144, 408–427 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-008-0154-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-008-0154-z

Keywords

Navigation