Advertisement

Review of World Economics

, Volume 143, Issue 4, pp 742–763 | Cite as

Aid Effectiveness, Debt Relief and Public Finance Response: Evidence from a Panel of HIPC Countries

  • Danny  Cassimon
  • Bjorn Van Campenhout
Article

Abstract

Substantial amounts of debt relief have been granted to a set of low-income countries, as an alternative aid modality. Although the theoretical case for debt relief is firmly established, only empirical analysis can show whether debt relief is indeed a (more) effective mode of aid delivery. We investigate the linkages between debt relief and other fiscal variables such as current expenditure, government investment, taxation and domestic borrowing, in comparison to the effects of grants and concessional loans. We find that the fiscal impact of HIPC debt relief follows fairly complex dynamics. For example, debt relief initially reduces government investment, but the effect becomes positive after two years, well outperforming other modes of aid delivery.

Keywords

HIPC debt relief fiscal response aid effectiveness 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Arellano, M., and S. R. Bond (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. Review of Economic Studies 58 (2): 277–297.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berlage, L., D. Cassimon, J. Drèze, and P. Reding (2003). Prospective Aid and Indebtedness Relief: A Proposal. World Development 31 (10): 1635–1654.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Birdsall, N., S. Claessens, and I. Diwan (2003). Policy Selectivity Foregone: Debt and Donor Behaviour in Africa. World Bank Economic Review 17 (3): 409–435.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bond, S. R. (2002). Dynamic Panel Data Models: A Guide to Micro Data Methods and Practice. CEMMAP Working Papers CWP09/02. Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies, London.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bulow, J., and K. Rogoff (1991). Sovereign Repurchases: No Cure for Overhang. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (4): 1219–1235.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burnside, C., and D. Dollar (2000). Aid, Policies, and Growth. American Economic Review 90 (4): 847–868.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cassimon, D., and J. Vaessen (2007). Theory, Practice and Potential of Debt for Development Swaps in the Asian and Pacific Region. Economic Systems 31 (1): 12–34.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cassimon, D., and B. Van Campenhout (2006). Aid Effectiveness, Debt Relief and Public Finance Response: Evidence from a Panel of HIPC Countries. IOB-UA Working Paper 2006.02. Available at <http://www.ua.ac.be/download.aspx?c=.IOBE&n=37408&ct=38185&e=115146>.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chauvin, N. D., and A. Kraay (2005). What Has 100 Billion Dollars Worth of Debt Relief Done for Low-Income Countries? International Finance 0510001, EconWPA. Available at <http://ssrn.com/abstract=818504>.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Claessens, S., E. Detragiache, R. Kanbur, and P. Wickham (1997). HIPCs’ Debt. Review of the Issues. Journal of African Economies 6 (2): 231–254.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cohen, D. (1996). The Sustainability of African Debt. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 1621. World Bank, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    De Grooth, A., G. Jennes, and D. Cassimon (2006). The Management of HIPC Savings in Five African Countries. In P. Bursens and P. Thijssen (eds.), Zoon Politikon: tussen effectiviteit en legitimiteit. Bruges: Vandenbroele.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fagernäs, S., and J. Roberts (2004). Fiscal Impact of Aid: A Survey of Issues and Synthesis of Country Studies of Malawi, Uganda and Zambia. ODI, ESAU Working Paper 11. Overseas Development Institute, London.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Franco-Rodriguez, S., O. Morrissey, and M. McGillivray (1998). Aid and the Public Sector in Pakistan: Evidence with Endogenous Aid. World Development 26 (7): 1241–1250.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gupta S., B. Clements, A. Pivovarsky, and E. Tiongson (2004). Foreign Aid and Revenue Response: Does the Composition of Aid Matter? In S. Gupta, B. Clements, and G. Inchauste (eds.), Helping Countries Develop. The Role of Fiscal Policy. Washington, D.C.: IMF.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Heller, P. S. (1975). A Model of Public Fiscal Behavior in Developing Countries: Aid, Investment, and Taxation. American Economic Review 65 (3): 429–445.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Heller, P. S. (2005). Understanding Fiscal Space. IMF Policy Discussion Paper PDP/05/4. International Monetary Fund, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Holtz-Eakin, D., W. Newey, and H. S. Rosen (1988). Estimating Vector Autoregressions with Panel Data. Econometrica 56 (6): 1371–1395.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    IDA (International Development Association) and IMF (International Monetary Fund) (2006). Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative and Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative (MDRI) – Status of Implementation. Washington, D.C.: IDA and IMF.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    IMF (International Monetary Fund) and IDA (International Development Association) (2001). Tracking of Poverty-Reducing Public Spending in Heavily Indebted Poor Countries. Washington, D.C.: IMF and IDA.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Krugman, P. (1988). Financing vs. Forgiving a Debt Overhang. Journal of Development Economics 29 (3): 253–268.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mavrotas, G. (2002). Foreign Aid and Fiscal Response: Does Aid Aggregation Matter. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv/Review of World Economics 138 (3): 534–559.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    McGillivray, M., and O. Morrissey (2004). Fiscal Effects of Aid. In T. Addison and A. Roe (eds.), Fiscal Policy for Development: Poverty, Reconstruction and Growth. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    McGillivray, M., and B. Ouattara (2005). Aid, Debt Burden and Government Fiscal Behaviour in Côte d’Ivoire. Journal of African Economies 14 (2): 247–269.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ndikumana, L. (2004). Additionality of Debt Relief and Debt Forgiveness, and Implications for Future Volumes of Official Assistance. International Review of Economics and Finance 13 (3): 325–340Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nickell, S. (1981). Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed Effects. Econometrica 49 (6): 1417–1426.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    OED (Operations Evaluation Department) (2004). Debt Relief for the Poorest: An OED Review of the HIPC Initiative. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Osei, R., O. Morrissey, and T. Lloyd (2005). The Fiscal Effects of Aid in Ghana. Journal of International Development 17 (8): 1037–1053.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pack, H., and J. R. Pack (1993). Foreign Aid and the Question of Fungibility. Review of Economics and Statistics 75 (2): 258–265.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Renard, R. (2006). The Cracks in the New Aid Paradigm. IOB Discussion Paper 2006.01. IOB, University of Antwerp, Antwerp.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Roodman, D. (2005). xtabond2: Stata Module to Extend xtabond Dynamic Panel Data Estimator. Center for Global Development, Washington, D.C. Available at <http://econpapers.repec.org/software/bocbocode/s435901.htm>.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sims, C. A. (1980). Macroeconomics and Reality. Econometrica 48 (1): 1–48.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Thomas, A. (2006). Do Debt-Service Savings and Grants Boost Social Expenditures? IMF Working Paper 180. International Monetary Fund, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Van de Walle, N., and T. Johnston (1996). Improving Aid to Africa. Washington, D.C.: Overseas Development Council.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Weeks, J., and T. McKinley (2006). Does Debt Relief Increase Fiscal Space in Zambia? The MDG Implications. International Poverty Centre Country Study 5. Brasilia: UNDP.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    World Bank (1998). Assessing Aid: What Works, What Doesn’t and Why. World Bank Policy Research Report. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    World Bank (2006). Debt Relief for the Poorest: An Evaluation Update of the HIPC Initiative. Independent Evaluation Group, World Bank, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kiel Institute 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Development Policy and Management (IOB)University of AntwerpAntwerpenBelgium
  2. 2.Universiy of AntwerpAntwerpenBelgium

Personalised recommendations