Skip to main content

Location: A Neglected Determinant of Firm Growth

Review of World Economics volume 143, pages 79–107 (2007)Cite this article

Abstract

This paper links the performance of new technology firms, measured in terms of employment growth, to geographic location. We introduce a model of firm growth that is specific to characteristics of the location as well as the firm and industry. The model is estimated using a unique data set identifying the growth performance of small technology-based firms in Germany. We find that firm performance, as measured by employment growth, does appear to be influenced by locational characteristics as well as characteristics specific to the firm and the industry. In particular, the empirical evidence suggests that being located in an agglomeration rich in knowledge resources is more conducive to firm growth than being located in a region that is less endowed with knowledge resources. These results suggest the economic value of location as a conduit for accessing external knowledge resources, which in turn, manifests itself in higher rates of growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. Acs, Z., and C. Armington (2004). The Impact of Geographic Differences in Human Capital on Service Firm Formation Rates. Journal of Urban Economics 56 (2): 244–278.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Almus, M., and E. A. Nerlinger (2000). Testing ‘Gibrat’s Law’ for Young Firms—Empirical Results for West Germany. Small Business Economics 15 (1): 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Audretsch, D. B., and M. P. Feldman (1996). R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production. American Economic Review 86 (3): 630–640.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Audretsch, D. B., and M. Keilbach (2004). Entrepreneurship Capital and Economic Performance. Regional Studies 38 (8): 949–959.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ballot, G., and E. Taymaz (1997). The Dynamics of Firms in a Micro-to-Macro Model: The Role of Training, Learning and Innovation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 7 (4): 435–457.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bartik, T. S. (1989). Small Business Start-Ups in the United States: Estimates and the Effects of Characteristics of States. Southern Economic Journal 55 (4): 1004–1018.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bröcker, J. (1995). Korreferat zum Referat Agglomerationen und regionale Spillovereffekte von D. Harhoff. In B. Gahlen, H. Hesse and H. J. Ramser (eds.), Neue Ansätze zur Regionalökonomik. Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Seminar Ottobeuren Band 24. Tübingen: Mohr.

  8. Bröcker, J. (2004). Agglomeration and Knowledge Diffusion. In R. Capello and P. Nijkamp (eds.), Urban Dynamics and Growth: Advances in Urban Economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  9. Carlton, D. W. (1983). The Location Employment Choices of New Firms: An Econometric Model with Discrete and Continuous Endogenous Variables. Review of Economics and Statistics 65 (3): 440–449.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Caves, R. (1998). Industrial Organization and New Findings on the Turnover and Mobility of Firms. Journal of Economic Literature 36 (4): 1947–1982.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Deutsche Boerse AG (2002). What’s Changing in Deutsche Börse’s Market Segments? Stocks & Standards 8/2002.

  12. Dosi, G., O. Marsili, L. Orsenigo, and R. Salvatore (1995). Learning, Market Selection and the Evolution of Industrial Structures. Small Business Economics 7 (6): 411–436.

  13. Ericson, R., and A. Pakes (1995). Markov-Perfect Industry Dynamics: A Framework for Empirical Work. Review of Economic Studies 62 (1): 53–82.

  14. Evans, D. (1987). Tests of Alternative Theories of Firm Growth. Journal of Political Economy 95 (4): 658–674.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Feldman, M. P. (1999). The Economics of Innovation, Spillovers and Agglomeration: A Review of Empirical Studies. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 8 (1): 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Feldman, M. P., and D. B. Audretsch (1999). Innovation in Cities: Science-Based Diversity, Specialization and Localized Competition. European Economic Review 43 (2): 409–429.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fritsch, M. (1997). New Firms and Regional Employment Change. Small Business Economics 9 (5): 437–448.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fritsch, M., and P. Müller (2005). The Evolution of Regional Entrepreneurship and Growth Regimes. In M. Fritsch and J. Schmude (eds.), Entrepreneurship in the Region. New York: Springer.

  19. Fujita, M., P. Krugman, and A. Venables (1999). The Spatial Economy—Cities, Regions and International Trade. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

  20. Glaeser, E., H. Kallal, J. Scheinkman, and A. Shleifer (1992). Growth of Cities. Journal of Political Economy 100 (6): 1126–1152.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Griliches, Z. (1979). Issues in Assessing the Contribution of R&D to Productivity Growth. Bell Journal of Economics 10 (1): 92–116.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hall, B. (1987). The Relationship between Firm Size and Firm Growth in the US Manufacturing Sector. Journal of Industrial Economics 35 (4): 583–604.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Heckman, J. J. (1976). The Common Structure of Statistical Models of Truncation, Sample Selection, and Limited Dependent Variables and a Simple Estimator for Such Models. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement 5: 475–492.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Henderson, J. V., A. Kuncoro, and M. Turner (1995). Industrial Development in Cities. Journal of Political Economy 103 (5): 1067–1090.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hoover, E. M. (1937). Location Theory and the Shoe and Leather Industries. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

  26. Jaffe, A. B. (1989). Real Effects of Academic Research. American Economic Review 79 (5): 957–970.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jaffe, A. B., M. Trajtenberg, and R. Henderson (1993). Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 (3): 577–598.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jovanovic, B. (1982). Selection and the Evolution of Industry. Econometrica 50 (3): 649–670.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jovanovic, B., and R. Rob (1989). The Growth and Diffusion of Knowledge. Review of Economic Studies 56 (4): 569–582.

  30. Klodt, H. (2001). The Essence of the New Economy. Kiel Discussion Papers 375. Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiel.

  31. Klodt, H., C. M. Buch, B. Christensen, E. Gundlach, R. P. Heinrich, J. Kleinert, D. Piazolo, K. Sailer, and J. Stehn (2003). Die neue Ökonomie: Erscheinungsformen, Ursachen und Auswirkungen. Kiel Studies 321. Kiel: Springer.

  32. Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing Returns and Economic Geography. Journal of Political Economy 99 (3): 483–499.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Krugman, P. (1998). What’s New About the New Economic Geography? Oxford Review of Economic Policy 14 (2): 7–17.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the Mechanisms of Economic Development. Journal of Monetary Economics 22 (1): 3–42.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mansfield, E. (1962). Entry, Gibrat’s Law, Innovation, and the Growth of Firms. American Economic Review 52 (5): 1023–1051.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of Economics London: Macmillan.

  37. Maurel, F., and B. Sédillot (1999). A Measure of the Geographic Concentration in French Manufacturing Industries. Regional Science and Urban Economics 29 (5): 575–604.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Norton, R. D. (2000). The Geography of the New Economy. In Scott Loveridge (ed.), The Web Book of Regional Science. Morgantown, WV: Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University <www.rri.wvu.edu/regscweb.htm>.

  39. Pakes, A., and R. Ericson (1998). Empirical Implications of Alternative Models of Firm Dynamics. Journal of Economic Theory 79 (1): 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal Knowledge. Towards a Post-Critical Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  41. Rauch, J. E. (1993). Productivity Gains from Geographic Concentration of Human Capital: Evidence from the Cities. Journal of Urban Economics 34 (3): 380–400.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Reynolds, P., D. Storey, and P. Westhead (1994). Cross-National Comparisons of the Variation in New Firm Formation Rates. Regional Studies 28 (4): 443–456.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Romer, P. (1986). Increasing Returns and Long-Run Economic Growth. Journal of Political Economy 94 (5): 1002–1037.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Romer, P. (1990). Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy 94 (1): 71–102.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Rosenthal, S., and W. Strange (2003). Geography, Industrial Organizations and Agglomeration. Review of Economics and Statistics 85 (2): 377–393.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Singh, A., and G. Whittington (1975). The Size and Growth of Firms. Review of Economic Studies 42 (1): 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Sutton, J. (1997). Gibrat’s Legacy. Journal of Economic Literature 35 (1): 40–59.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Tschoegel, A. E. (1983). Size, Growth, and Transnationality Among the World’s Largest Banks. Journal of Business 56 (2): 187–201.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

  50. Zucker, L. G., M. R. Darby, and M. B. Brewer (1998). Intellectual Human Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotech Enterprises. American Economic Review 88 (1): 290–306.

    Google Scholar 

Data Sources

  1. BBR (Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung) (2001). Aktuelle Daten zur Entwicklung der Städte, Kreise und Gemeinden. Berichte. Band 8. Bonn.

  2. BVK (Bundesverband Deutscher Kapitalbeteiligungsgesellschaften) e.V. (2003). Mitgliederdatenbank. Electronic document <http://www.bvk-ev.de>, accessed on April 25, 2003.

  3. Deutsche Boerse AG (2003). Neuer Markt. Electronic document <http://www. neuer-markt.de>, accessed on March 30, 2003.

  4. Onvista AG (2003). Einzelwerte NEMAX 50 Performance-Index. Electronic database <http://index.onvista.de/stocks.html?IDNOTATION=2580608>, accessed on March 30, 2003.

  5. RBSC (Roland Berger Strategy Consultants) (2002). Der Beitrag der am Neuen Markt gelisteten Unternehmen für die Beschäftigung in Deutschland. (Studie im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Wirtschaft und Technologie) Berlin.

  6. SdK (Schutzgemeinschaft der Kleinaktionäre) e.V. (2003). HV-Info: Informationen rund um die Hauptversammlungen aller börsennotierten deutschen Aktiengesellschaften, Unternehmensberichte und –meldungen. Electronic database <http://www.hv-info.de>, accessed on April 15, 2003.

  7. Statistisches Bundesamt (1999). Statistisches Jahrbuch 1999 für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Wiesbaden.

  8. Statistische Ämter des Bundes und der Länder (var. issues). Statistik regional—Daten für die Kreise und kreisfreien Städte Deutschlands auf CD-ROM. Wiesbaden.

  9. ZEW Mannheim (2003). ZEW-Gründungspanels Ost und West. Gründungsintensitäten 1997–2000 nach Kreisen und Raumordnungsregionen. Mannheim.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA

    David B. Audretsch

  2. MPI Jena, Jena, Germany

    David B. Audretsch

  3. CEPR, London, UK

    David B. Audretsch

  4. Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Düsternbrooker Weg 120, 24105, Kiel, Germany

    Dirk Dohse

Authors
  1. David B. Audretsch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dirk Dohse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dirk Dohse.

Additional information

JEL no.

L10, R11, O12, O30

About this article

Cite this article

Audretsch, D., Dohse, D. Location: A Neglected Determinant of Firm Growth. Rev. World Econ. 143, 79–107 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-007-0099-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-007-0099-7

Keywords

  • Agglomeration
  • knowledge resources
  • firm growth