Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Impact of Industry Characteristics and IPR Policy on Foreign Direct Investment

  • Published:
Review of World Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the interaction of industry characteristics and intellectual property rights (IPRs) on multinational firm behavior. The results suggest that firms in industries with high capital costs are more likely to maintain control over production knowledge in countries with less intellectual property protection by engaging in foreign direct investment (FDI). Moreover, when IPRs are strong, firms in industries with high investment in research and development (R&D) are more likely to enter a market by licensing to an unaffiliated host firm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aitken, B., and A. E. Harrison (1999). Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Direct Foreign Investment? Evidence from Venezuela. American Economic Review 89 (3): 605–618.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anand, B., and T. Khanna (2000). The Structure of Licensing Contracts. Journal of Industrial Economics 48 (1): 103–135.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blonigen, B. (1997). Firm-Specific Assets and the Link between Exchange Rates and Foreign Direct Investment. American Economic Review 87 (3): 447–465.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Borjas, G., and G. Sueyoshi (1994). A Two-Stage Estimator for Probit Models with Group Structural Effects. Journal of Econometrics 64 (1/2): 165–182.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brainard, S. L. (1997). An Empirical Assessment of the Proximity-Concentration Trade-Off between Multinational Sales and Trade. American Economic Review 87 (4): 520–544.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen, W. M., R. R. Nelson, and J. P. Walsh (2000). Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (Or Not). NBER Working Paper No. 7552. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass.

  7. Dunning, J. (1981). International Production and the Multinational Enterprise. London: George Allen and Unwin.

  8. Evenett, S. (2002). How Much Have Merger Review Laws Reduced Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions? Mimeo. World Trade Institute, Bern.

  9. Ferrantino, M. (1993). The Effect of Intellectual Property Rights on International Trade and Investment. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv/Review of World Economics 129 (2): 300–331.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fox, E. (2000). Antitrust and Regulatory Federalism: Races Up, Down, and Sideways. New York Law Review 75 (6): 101–126.

  11. Gallini, N., and B. Wright (1990). Technology Transfer Under Asymmetric Information. RAND Journal of Economics 21 (1): 147–160.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ginarte, J. C., and W. G. Park (1997). Determinants of Patent Rights: A Cross-National Study. Research Policy 26 (3): 283–301.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Glass, A. (1997). Product Cycles and Market Penetration. International Economic Review 38 (4): 865–891.

  14. Graham, E. M., and J. D. Richardson (eds.) (1997). Global Competition Policy. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.

  15. Haddad, M., and A. Harrison (1993). Are There Positive Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment? Journal of Development Economics 42 (1): 51–74.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hanson, G. H. (2001). Should Countries Promote Foreign Direct Investment? G-24 Discussion Paper Series No. 9. New York.

  17. Hausman, J., B. Hall, and Z. Griliches (1984). Economic Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patent-R&D Relationship. Econometrica 52 (4): 909–938.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Helpman, E. (1993). Innovation, Imitation, and Intellectual Property Rights. Econometrica 61 (6): 1247–1280.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hines, J. R. (1995). Forbidden Payment: Foreign Bribery and American Business after 1977. NBER Working Paper No. 5266. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass.

  20. Hoeckman, B. (1997). Focal Points and Multilateral Negotiations on the Contestability of Markets. In K. E. Maskus, et al., (eds.), Robert M. Stern and His International Economic Legacy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

  21. Horstmann, I., and J. Markusen (1987). Licensing versus Direct Investment: A Model of Internalization by the Multinational Enterprise. Canadian Journal of Economics 20 (3): 464–481.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kaufmann, D., A. Kraay, and P. Zoido-Lobaton (1999). Aggregating Governance Indicators. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2195. World Bank, Washington, D.C.

  23. Kee, H. L., and B. Hoekman (2003). Imports, Entry, and Competition Law as Market Disciplines. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 3777. Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.

  24. Kogut, B., and S. J. Chang (1991). Technological Capabilities and Japanese Foreign Direct Investment in the United States. Review of Economics and Statistics 73 (2): 401–413.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kokko, A. (1994). Technology, Market Characteristics, and Spillovers. Journal of Development Economics 43 (2): 279–293.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kondo, E. (1995). The Effect of Patent Protection on Foreign Direct Investment. Journal of World Trade 29 (6): 265–290.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Levin, R., A. Klevorick, R. Nelson, and S. Winter (1987). Appropriating the Returns from Research and Development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 3: 783–820.

  28. Mansfield, E. (1994). Intellectual Property Protection, Foreign Direct Investment, and Technology Transfer. Discussion Paper 19. International Finance Corporation, Washington, D.C.

  29. Mansfield, E. (1995). Intellectual Property Protection, Foreign Direct Investment, and Technology Transfer: Germany, Japan, and the United States. Discussion Paper 27. International Finance Corporation, Washington, D.C.

  30. Maskus, K. (1998). The International Regulation of Intellectual Property. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv/Review of World Economics 134 (2): 186–208.

  31. Maskus, K. (2000). Intellectual Property Rights in the Global Economy. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.

  32. Markusen, J. (1995). The Boundaries of Multinational Enterprises and the Theory of International Trade. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 (2): 169–189.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Markusen, J. (2001). Contracts, Intellectual Property Rights, and Multinational Investment in Developing Countries. Journal of International Economics 53 (1): 189–204.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mataloni, R. J. (1995). A Guide to BEA Statistics on U.S. Multinational Companies. Survey of Current Business 75 (March): 38–55.

  35. McDaniel, C. (2000). Inventing Around and Impacts on Modes of Entry in Japan: A Cross-Country Analysis of U.S. Affiliate Sales and Licensing. U.S. International Trade Commission Working Paper 99-11-A. Washington, D.C.

  36. Moulton, B. (1990). An Illustration of a Pitfall in Estimating the Effects of Aggregate Variables on Micro Units. Review of Economics and Statistics 72 (2): 334–338.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Nicholson, M. (2002). Intellectual Property Protection, Internalization, and Technology Transfer. Federal Trade Commission Working Paper No. 250. Washington, D.C.

  38. Rapp, R., and R. Rozek (1990). Benefits and Costs of Intellectual Property Protection in Developing Countries. Journal of World Trade 24 (5): 75–102.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Smarzynska, B. (2004). Composition of Foreign Direct Investment and Protection of Intellectual Property Rights: Evidence from Transition Economies. European Economic Review 48 (1): 39–62.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Smarzynska, B., and S. Wei (2002). Corruption and Cross-Border Investment: Firm-Level Evidence. Mimeo. World Bank, Washington, D.C.

  41. Smith, P. J. (2001). How Do Foreign Patent Rights Affect U.S. Exports, Affiliate Sales, and Licenses? Journal of International Economics 55 (2): 411–439.

    Google Scholar 

  42. United Nations (2001). Human Development Report. New York: UN.

  43. Wei, S. (2000a). How Taxing Is Corruption on International Investors? Review of Economics and Statistics 82 (1): 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wei, S. (2000b). Local Corruption and Global Capital Flows. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2: 303–354.

  45. Yang, G., and K. Maskus (2001a). Intellectual Property Rights, Licensing, and Innovation in an Endogenous Product Cycle Model. Journal of International Economics 53 (1): 169–188.

  46. Yang, G., and K. Maskus (2001b). Intellectual Property Rights and Licensing: an Econometric Investigation. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv/Review of World Economics 137 (1): 58–79.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Transylvania University, 300 N Broadway, 40508, Lexington, KY, USA

    Michael W Nicholson

Authors
  1. Michael W Nicholson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael W Nicholson.

Additional information

JEL no.

F23, C25, O34

About this article

Cite this article

Nicholson, M. The Impact of Industry Characteristics and IPR Policy on Foreign Direct Investment. Rev. World Econ. 143, 27–54 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-007-0097-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-007-0097-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation