Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal treatments for photodynamic therapy

  • Industry
  • Published:
4OR Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Medical applications in operations research have flourished over the last few decades, and one of the most prolific topics has been how to optimally design cancer treatments. The preponderance of this research has considered radiotherapy design, but several new procedures are emerging as alternatives to standard treatments. This paper addresses the developing treatment modality called photodynamic therapy (PDT), which uses the light-harvesting properties of a photosensitizer. The premise is that cells expire due to a toxic reaction caused by exposing a photosensitizer to a specific wavelength of light. The purpose of treatment design is to decide how to best treat the patient, meaning that cancerous tissues are damaged but that surrounding organs are not. This paper has two objectives. First, we develop a model that allows us to explore the design process. In particular, we develop a standard pharmacokinetic model to estimate the absorption and elimination of the photosensitizer. The biological model provides the data to cast the design process as a time dependent linear program. Second, we use the linear program to answer the question of whether or not PDT is a viable treatment for deep tissue cancers with the only drug currently approved in the USA. Our results indicate that even under optimal conditions, the treatments based on the currently approved drug are not capable of targeting tumors without destroying surrounding tissues. However, a treatment’s success significantly increases with the drug’s affinity for cancerous tissues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bartolozzi F et al (2000) Operational research techniques in medical treatment and diagnosis. A review. Eur J Oper Res 121(3):435–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourne D, Triggs E, Eadie M (1986) Pharmacokinetics for the Non-Mathematical. MTP Press Limited, The Hague, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Bressler N, Bressler S (2000) Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin(visudyne): Impact on ophthalmology and visual sciences. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:624–628

    Google Scholar 

  • Chwilkowska A, Saczko J, Modrzycka T, Marcinkowska A, Malarska A, Bielewicz J, Patalas D, Banas T (2003) Uptake of photofrin II, a photosensitizer used in photodynamic therapy, by tumor cells in vivo. Acta Biochim Polonica 50(2):509–513

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty T, Kaufman J, Goldfarb A, Weishaupt K, Boyle D, Mittleman A (1978) Photoradiation therapy for the treatment of malignant tumors. Cancer Res 38:2628–2635

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan T, Ortel B, Moor A (2000) Mechanisms of photodynamic therapy. In: Patrice T, Haeder D, Jori G (eds) Reviews in photosciences: photodynamic therapy. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands

  • Hasan T, Ortel B, Moor A, Pogue B (2003) Photodynamic therapy of cancer. In: Pollock R, Weichselbaum R, Gansler T, Holland J, E. Frei III E, Bast R, Kufe D (eds) Cancer medicine, 5th edn. B.C. Decker, pp 489–502

  • Holder A (2004) Radiotherapy treatment design and linear programming. In: Brandeau M, Sainfort F, Pierskalla W (eds) Operations research and health care: a handbook of methods and applications, chap 29. Kluwer, Dordrecht

  • Holder A (2003) Designing radiotherapy plans with elastic constraints and interior point methods. Health Care Manage Sci 6(1):5–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopper C (2000) Photodynamic therapy: a clinical reality in the treatment of cancer. Lancet Oncol 1:212–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacques S (1992) Laser-tissue interactions: photochemical, photothermal, and photomechanical. Surg Clin North Am 72(3):531–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Jori G (1990) Factors controlling the selectivity and efficiency of tumour damage in photodynamic therapy. Lasers Med Sci 5(115):115–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCaughan J (1999) Photodynamic therapy: a review. Drugs Aging 15(1):49–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMurry J (2000) Organic chemistry, 5th edn. Brooks/Cole, Belmont

    Google Scholar 

  • Oikonen V (2002) Model equations for [15O]H2O pet perfusion (blood flow) studies. In: Technical Report report TPCMOD0004, Turka PET Centre Modeling, Turku University Central Hospital

  • Pandey R, Zheng G (2000) Porphyrins as photosensitizers in photodynamic therapy. In: Kadish KM, Smith KM, Guilard R (eds) The Porphyrin handbook, vol 6. Academic, New York

  • Rosen I, Lane R, Morrill S, Belli J (1991) Treatment plan optimization using linear programming. Med Phys 18(2):141–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard D, Ferris M, Olivera G, Mackie T (1999) Optimizing the delivery of radiation therapy to cancer patients. SIAM Rev 41(4):721–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Holder.

Additional information

The authors are grateful for the comments of the editor and the referee on the original submission.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holder, A., LLagostera, D. Optimal treatments for photodynamic therapy. 4OR 6, 167–182 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10288-007-0046-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10288-007-0046-4

Keywords

MSC Classification (2000)

Navigation