Advertisement

Computational Management Science

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 559–583 | Cite as

Implied volatility and state price density estimation: arbitrage analysis

  • Miloš Kopa
  • Sebastiano Vitali
  • Tomáš Tichý
  • Radek Hendrych
Original Paper
  • 130 Downloads

Abstract

This paper deals with implied volatility (IV) estimation using no-arbitrage techniques. The current market practice is to obtain IV of liquid options as based on Black–Scholes (BS type hereafter) models. Such volatility is subsequently used to price illiquid or even exotic options. Therefore, it follows that the BS model can be related simultaneously to the whole set of IVs as given by maturity/moneyness relation of tradable options. Then, it is possible to get IV curve or surface (a so called smile or smirk). Since the moneyness and maturity of IV often do not match the data of valuated options, some sort of estimating and local smoothing is necessary. However, it can lead to arbitrage opportunity if no-arbitrage conditions on state price density (SPD) are ignored. In this paper, using option data on DAX index, we aim to analyse the behavior of IV and SPD with respect to different choices of bandwidth parameter h, time to maturity and kernel function. A set of bandwidths which violates no-arbitrage conditions is identified. We document that the change of h implies interesting changes in the violation interval of moneyness. We also perform the analysis after removing outliers, in order to show that not only outliers cause the violation of no-arbitrage conditions. Moreover, we propose a new measure of arbitrage which can be considered either for the SPD curve (arbitrage area measure) or for the SPD surface (arbitrage volume measure). We highlight the impact of h on the proposed measures considering the options on a German stock index. Finally, we propose an extension of the IV and SPD estimation for the case of options on a dividend-paying stock.

Keywords

Option pricing Implied volatility State price density No-arbitrage conditions Local polynomial smoothing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research was supported by the Czech Science Foundation under Project 402/12/G097 and 16-09541S and the European Social Fund (CZ.1.07/2.3.00/20.0296). The third author was supported also through an SP2017/32, an SGS research project of VSB-TU Ostrava. The support is greatly acknowledged. All computations were done in MatLab 2009 and GAMS 23.5.

References

  1. Avellaneda M, Friedman C, Holmes R, Samperi D (1997) Calibrating volatility surfaces via relative-entropy minimization. Appl Math Financ 4(1):37–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benko M, Fengler M, Härdle W, Kopa M (2007) On extracting information implied in options. Comput Stat 22(4):543–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Black F, Scholes M (1973) The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. J Polit Econ 81(3):637–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bloch DA (2010) A practical guide to implied and local volatility. Available at SSRN 1538808Google Scholar
  5. Bloch DA, Coello CAC (2011) Smiling at evolution. Appl Soft Comput 11(8):5724–5734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borovkova S, Permana FJ (2009) Implied volatility in oil markets. Comput Stat Data Anal 53(6):2022–2039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brockhaus O, Farkas M, Ferraris A, Long D, Overhaus M (2000) Equity derivatives and market risk models. Risk, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Brunner B, Hafner R (2003) Arbitrage-free estimation of the risk-neutral density from the implied volatility smile. J Comput Financ 7(1):75–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cont R, Da Fonseca J (2002) Dynamics of implied volatility surfaces. Quant Financ 2(1):45–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dumas B, Fleming J, Whaley RE (1998) Implied volatility functions: empirical tests. J Financ 53(6):2059–2106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dupire B (1994) Pricing with a smile. Risk 7(1):18–20Google Scholar
  12. Fan J, Gijbels I (1996) Local polynomial modelling and its applications: monographs on statistics and applied probability, vol 66. CRC Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Fan J, Yao Q (2003) Nonlinear time series. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  14. Fengler M (2005) Semiparametric modeling of implied volatility. Springer finance. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  15. Fengler MR (2006) Semiparametric modeling of implied volatility. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  16. Fengler MR (2009) Arbitrage-free smoothing of the implied volatility surface. Quant Financ 9(4):417–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fengler MR (2012) Option data and modeling BSM implied volatility. In: Duan JCH, Härdle WK, Gentle JE (eds) Handbook of computational finance. Springer, Berlin, pp 117–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fengler MR, Hin L-Y (2015) Semi-nonparametric estimation of the call-option price surface under strike and time-to-expiry no-arbitrage constraints. J Econ 184(2):242–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fengler MR, Härdle WK, Villa C (2003) The dynamics of implied volatilities: a common principal components approach. Rev Deriv Res 6(3):179–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Glaser J, Heider P (2012) Arbitrage-free approximation of call price surfaces and input data risk. Quant Financ 12(1):61–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hardle W (1990) Applied nonparametric regression. Cambridge Univ Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Homescu C (2011) Implied volatility surface: construction methodologies and characteristics. Available at SSRN 1882567Google Scholar
  23. Jackwerth JC (2004) Option-implied risk-neutral distributions and risk aversion. Research Foundation of AIMR, CharlottevilleGoogle Scholar
  24. Kahalé N (2004) An arbitrage-free interpolation of volatilities. Risk 17(5):102–106Google Scholar
  25. Kim N, Lee J (2013) No-arbitrage implied volatility functions: empirical evidence from kospi 200 index options. J Empir Financ 21:36–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ludwig M (2015) Robust estimation of shape-constrained state price density surfaces. J Deriv 22(3):56–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Merton RC (1973) Rational theory of option pricing. Bell J Econ Manag Sci 4:141–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shimko D (1993) Bounds of probability. Risk 6(4):33–37Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miloš Kopa
    • 1
  • Sebastiano Vitali
    • 1
  • Tomáš Tichý
    • 2
  • Radek Hendrych
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Probability and Mathematical Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and PhysicsCharles UniversityPragueCzech Republic
  2. 2.Department of Finance, Faculty of EconomicsVŠB-Technical University OstravaOstravaCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations