The secondary benefits of climate change mitigation: an overlapping generations approach

Abstract

We modify a model of climate and economy to address the effects of the reduction in atmospheric pollutants which occurs as a result of climate change mitigation policies. In particular, the reduction of sulphur dioxide (SO2) emissions as a result of climate change policies leads to reduced statistical morbidity and infant mortality, but increased short term climate change. It remains the case, even with the consideration of secondary benefits, that there are welfare costs of GHG emission control to almost all working-age agents alive when the policies are imposed, which suggests that the consideration of secondary benefits alone may not be sufficient to provoke aggressive action on climate change.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Amann M, Cofala J, Heyes C, Klimont Z, Schöpp W (1999) The RAINS model: a tool for assessing regional emission control strategies in Europe. Pollut Atmos 4:41–63

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ansuategi A, Escapa M (2002) Economic growth and greenhouse gas emissions. Ecolo Econ 40(1):23–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Burtraw D, Krupnick A, Palmer K, Paul A, Toman M, Bloyd C (1999) Ancillary benefits of reduced air pollution in the US from moderate greenhouse gas mitigation policies in the electricity sector. Technical Report 99-51, Resources for the Future, USA

  4. Chay KY, Greenstone M (2003) The impact of air pollution on infant mortality: Evidence from geographic variation in pollution shocks induced by a recession. Q J Econ 118(3):1121–1167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Diamond PA (1965) National debt in a neoclassical growth model. Am Econ Rev 55(5):1126–1150

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ekins P (1996) How large a carbon tax is justified by the secondary benefits of CO2 abatement. Resour Energy Econ 18(2):161–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ekins P, Speck S (1999) Competitiveness and exemptions from environmental taxes in Europe. Environ Resour Econ 13(4):369–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Eyckmans J, Bertrand C (2000) Integrated assessment of carbon and sulphur emissions, simulations with the CLIMNEG model. ETE Working Paper 2000-08, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium

  9. Gerlagh R, Keyzer MA (2001) Sustainability and the intergenerational distribution of natural resource entitlements. J Public Econ 79(2):315–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gerlagh R, van der Zwaan B (2001) The effects of ageing and an environmental trust fund in an overlapping generations model on carbon emission reductions. Ecol Econ 36:311–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gerlagh R, van der Zwaan B (2003) Gross world product and consumption in a global warming model with endogenous technical change. Resour Energy Econ 25:35–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Holland M, Berry J, Forster D (1999) Externe, 1999: externalities of energy, vol 7: methodology 1998 Update. Technical report, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg

  13. Howarth RB (1998) An overlapping generations model of climate-economy interactions. Scand J Econ 100(3):575–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2000) Special report on emissions scenarios. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  15. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2001a) Climate change 2001: mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  16. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2001b) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  17. Kavuncu YO, Knabb SD (2005) Stabilizing greenhouse gas emissions: Assessing the intergenerational costs and benefits of the Kyoto Protocol. Energy Econ 27(3):369–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kverndokk S, Rosendahl K (2000) CO2 mitigation costs and ancillary benefits in the Nordic Countries the UK and Ireland: a survey. Technical Report Memorandum 34/2000, Department of Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo

  19. Leach A (2006) The welfare implications of climate change policy. Mimeo, November 2006. Revised version available at http://www.bus.ualberta.ca/aleach

  20. Manne AS, Mendelsohn R, Richels R (1995) MERGE: a model for evaluating regional and global effects of GHG reduction policies. Energy Policy 23(1):17–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Newbery DM (2005) Why tax energy? Towards a more rational policy. Energy J 26(3):1–39

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nordhaus WD, Boyer J (2000) Warming the world. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ono T, Maeda Y (2001) Is aging harmful to the environment?. Environ Resour Econ 20(2):113–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Overpeck J, Otto-Bliesner B, Miller G, Muhs D, Alley R, Kiehl J (2006) Paleoclimatic evidence for future ice-sheet instability and rapid sea-level rise. Science 311(5768):1747–1750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rignot E, Kanagaratnam P (2006) Changes in the velocity structure of the Greenland ice sheet. Science 311(5763):986–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Schwartz SE (1996) The whitehouse effect—shortwave radiative forcing anthropogenic aerosols: An overview. J Aerosol Sci 27(3):359–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shah J, Nagpal T, Johnson T, Amann M, Carmichael G, Foell W, Green C, Hettelingh JP, Hordijk L, Li J, Peng C, Pu Y, Ramankutty R, Streets D (2000) Integrated analysis for acid rain in Asia: Policy implications and results of the RAINS-Asia model. Ann Rev Energy Environ 25(5768):339–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tol R (2002) Estimates of the damage costs of climate change, part II. Dynamic estimates. Environ Resour Econ 21(2):135–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olivier Bahn.

Additional information

Olivier Bahn—Affiliated researcher: GERAD, Bahn acknowledges the support of NSERC. Andrew Leach—Affiliated researcher: CABREE, CIRANO, CIRPEE.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bahn, O., Leach, A. The secondary benefits of climate change mitigation: an overlapping generations approach. CMS 5, 233–257 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10287-007-0048-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Climate change
  • Environmental regulation
  • Growth
  • Pollution
  • Health

JEL classification

  • Q25
  • Q28