We modify a model of climate and economy to address the effects of the reduction in atmospheric pollutants which occurs as a result of climate change mitigation policies. In particular, the reduction of sulphur dioxide (SO2) emissions as a result of climate change policies leads to reduced statistical morbidity and infant mortality, but increased short term climate change. It remains the case, even with the consideration of secondary benefits, that there are welfare costs of GHG emission control to almost all working-age agents alive when the policies are imposed, which suggests that the consideration of secondary benefits alone may not be sufficient to provoke aggressive action on climate change.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Amann M, Cofala J, Heyes C, Klimont Z, Schöpp W (1999) The RAINS model: a tool for assessing regional emission control strategies in Europe. Pollut Atmos 4:41–63
Ansuategi A, Escapa M (2002) Economic growth and greenhouse gas emissions. Ecolo Econ 40(1):23–37
Burtraw D, Krupnick A, Palmer K, Paul A, Toman M, Bloyd C (1999) Ancillary benefits of reduced air pollution in the US from moderate greenhouse gas mitigation policies in the electricity sector. Technical Report 99-51, Resources for the Future, USA
Chay KY, Greenstone M (2003) The impact of air pollution on infant mortality: Evidence from geographic variation in pollution shocks induced by a recession. Q J Econ 118(3):1121–1167
Diamond PA (1965) National debt in a neoclassical growth model. Am Econ Rev 55(5):1126–1150
Ekins P (1996) How large a carbon tax is justified by the secondary benefits of CO2 abatement. Resour Energy Econ 18(2):161–187
Ekins P, Speck S (1999) Competitiveness and exemptions from environmental taxes in Europe. Environ Resour Econ 13(4):369–396
Eyckmans J, Bertrand C (2000) Integrated assessment of carbon and sulphur emissions, simulations with the CLIMNEG model. ETE Working Paper 2000-08, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
Gerlagh R, Keyzer MA (2001) Sustainability and the intergenerational distribution of natural resource entitlements. J Public Econ 79(2):315–341
Gerlagh R, van der Zwaan B (2001) The effects of ageing and an environmental trust fund in an overlapping generations model on carbon emission reductions. Ecol Econ 36:311–326
Gerlagh R, van der Zwaan B (2003) Gross world product and consumption in a global warming model with endogenous technical change. Resour Energy Econ 25:35–57
Holland M, Berry J, Forster D (1999) Externe, 1999: externalities of energy, vol 7: methodology 1998 Update. Technical report, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
Howarth RB (1998) An overlapping generations model of climate-economy interactions. Scand J Econ 100(3):575–591
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2000) Special report on emissions scenarios. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2001a) Climate change 2001: mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2001b) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kavuncu YO, Knabb SD (2005) Stabilizing greenhouse gas emissions: Assessing the intergenerational costs and benefits of the Kyoto Protocol. Energy Econ 27(3):369–386
Kverndokk S, Rosendahl K (2000) CO2 mitigation costs and ancillary benefits in the Nordic Countries the UK and Ireland: a survey. Technical Report Memorandum 34/2000, Department of Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo
Leach A (2006) The welfare implications of climate change policy. Mimeo, November 2006. Revised version available at http://www.bus.ualberta.ca/aleach
Manne AS, Mendelsohn R, Richels R (1995) MERGE: a model for evaluating regional and global effects of GHG reduction policies. Energy Policy 23(1):17–34
Newbery DM (2005) Why tax energy? Towards a more rational policy. Energy J 26(3):1–39
Nordhaus WD, Boyer J (2000) Warming the world. MIT Press, Cambridge
Ono T, Maeda Y (2001) Is aging harmful to the environment?. Environ Resour Econ 20(2):113–127
Overpeck J, Otto-Bliesner B, Miller G, Muhs D, Alley R, Kiehl J (2006) Paleoclimatic evidence for future ice-sheet instability and rapid sea-level rise. Science 311(5768):1747–1750
Rignot E, Kanagaratnam P (2006) Changes in the velocity structure of the Greenland ice sheet. Science 311(5763):986–990
Schwartz SE (1996) The whitehouse effect—shortwave radiative forcing anthropogenic aerosols: An overview. J Aerosol Sci 27(3):359–382
Shah J, Nagpal T, Johnson T, Amann M, Carmichael G, Foell W, Green C, Hettelingh JP, Hordijk L, Li J, Peng C, Pu Y, Ramankutty R, Streets D (2000) Integrated analysis for acid rain in Asia: Policy implications and results of the RAINS-Asia model. Ann Rev Energy Environ 25(5768):339–376
Tol R (2002) Estimates of the damage costs of climate change, part II. Dynamic estimates. Environ Resour Econ 21(2):135–160
Olivier Bahn—Affiliated researcher: GERAD, Bahn acknowledges the support of NSERC. Andrew Leach—Affiliated researcher: CABREE, CIRANO, CIRPEE.
About this article
Cite this article
Bahn, O., Leach, A. The secondary benefits of climate change mitigation: an overlapping generations approach. CMS 5, 233–257 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10287-007-0048-x
- Climate change
- Environmental regulation