Skip to main content
Log in

Diagnostic accuracy of ICD-9 code 780.2 for the identification of patients with syncope in the emergency department

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Clinical Autonomic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Syncope is a common condition that affects individuals of all ages and is responsible for 1–3% of all emergency department (ED) visits. Prospective studies on syncope are often limited by the exiguous number of subjects enrolled. A possible alternative approach would be to use of hospital discharge diagnoses from administrative databases to identify syncope subjects in epidemiological observational studies. We assessed the accuracy of the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) code 780.2 “syncope and collapse” to identify patients with syncope.

Methods

Patients in two teaching hospitals in Milan, Italy with a triage assessment for ED access that was possibly related to syncope were recruited in this study. We considered the index test to be the attribution of the ICD-9 code 780.2 at ED discharge and the reference standard to be the diagnosis of syncope by the ED physician.

Results

The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the ICD-9 code 780.2 to identify patients with syncope were 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58–0.67), 0.98 (95% CI 0.98–0.99), 0.83 (95% CI 0.79–0.87) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.94–0.95), respectively.

Conclusions

The moderate sensitivity of ICD-9 code 780.2 should be considered when the code is used to identify patients with syncope through administrative databases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moya A, Sutton R, Ammirati F, Blanc JJ, Brignole M, Dahm JB et al (2009) Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (version 2009). Eur Heart J 30:2631–2671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Costantino G, Perego F, Dipaola F, Borella M, Galli A, Cantoni G et al (2008) Short- and long-term prognosis of syncope, risk factors, and role of hospital admission. results from the STePS (short-term prognosis of syncope) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 51:276–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Saccilotto RT, Nickel CH, Bucher HC, Steyerberg EW, Bingisser R, Koller MT (2011) San Francisco syncope rule to predict short-term serious outcomes: a systematic review. CMAJ 183:E1116–E1126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Serrano LA, Hess EP, Bellolio MF, Murad MH, Montori VM, Erwin PJ et al (2010) Accuracy and quality of clinical decision rules for syncope in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Emerg Med 56(362–373):e1

    Google Scholar 

  5. Benesch C, Witter DM, Wilder AL, Duncan PW, Samsa GP, Matchar DB (1997) Inaccuracy of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9-CM) in identifying the diagnosis of ischemic cerebrovascular disease. Neurology 49:660–664

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Goldstein LB (1998) Accuracy of ICD-9-CM coding for the identification of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 29:1602–1604

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. McCormick N, Lacaille D, Bhole V, Avina-Zubieta JA (2014) Validity of heart failure diagnoses in administrative databases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 9:e104519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wendelboe AM, Campbell J, McCumber M, Bratzler D, Ding K, Beckman M et al (2015) The design and implementation of a new surveillance system for venous thromboembolism using combined active and passive methods. Am Heart J 170(447–454):e18

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sun BC, Derose SF, Liang LJ, Gabayan GZ, Hoffman JR, Moore AA et al (2009) Predictors of 30-day serious events in older patients with syncope. Ann Emerg Med 54(769–778):e5

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ruwald MH, Hansen ML, Lamberts M, Kristensen SL, Wissenberg M, Olsen A-MS et al (2013) Accuracy of the ICD-10 discharge diagnosis for syncope. Europace 15:595–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Grossman SA, Babineau M, Burke L, Kancharla A, Mottley L, Nencioni A et al (2012) Applying the Boston syncope criteria to near syncope. J Emerg Med 43:958–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cernuschi G, Bonzi M, Fiorelli E, Birocchi S (2012) Do outcomes of near syncope parallel syncope? Am J Emerg Med 30:2064–2065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Grossman SA, Babineau M, Burke L, Kancharla A, Mottley L, Nencioni A et al (2012) Do outcomes of near syncope parallel syncope? Am J Emerg Med 30:203–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ludovico Furlan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they do not have conflicts of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 61 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 65 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Furlan, L., Solbiati, M., Pacetti, V. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of ICD-9 code 780.2 for the identification of patients with syncope in the emergency department. Clin Auton Res 28, 577–582 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10286-018-0509-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10286-018-0509-z

Keywords

Navigation