Skip to main content
Log in

A Comparative Study of Performance Between Federated Learning and Centralized Learning Using Pathological Image of Endometrial Cancer

  • Published:
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Federated learning, an innovative artificial intelligence training method, offers a secure solution for institutions to collaboratively develop models without sharing raw data. This approach offers immense promise and is particularly advantageous for domains dealing with sensitive information, such as patient data. However, when confronted with a distributed data environment, challenges arise due to data paucity or inherent heterogeneity, potentially impacting the performance of federated learning models. Hence, scrutinizing the efficacy of this method in such intricate settings is indispensable. To address this, we harnessed pathological image datasets of endometrial cancer from four hospitals for training and evaluating the performance of a federated learning model and compared it with a centralized learning model. With optimal processing techniques (data augmentation, color normalization, and adaptive optimizer), federated learning exhibited lower precision but higher recall and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) than centralized learning. Hence, considering the critical importance of recall in the context of medical image processing, federated learning is demonstrated as a viable and applicable approach in this field, offering advantages in terms of both performance and data security.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data are accessible from the corresponding author by request, subject to approval from the institutional review board.

References

  1. Dhalla S, et al.: Semantic segmentation of palpebral conjunctiva using predefined deep neural architectures for anemia detection. Procedia Computer Science 218:328–337, 2023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kaur A, Kumar M, Jindal M: Cattle identification system: a comparative analysis of SIFT, SURF and ORB feature descriptors. Multimedia Tools and Applications:1–23, 2023

  3. Mohiuddin S, Malakar S, Kumar M, Sarkar R: A comprehensive survey on state-of-the-art video forgery detection techniques. Multimedia Tools and Applications:1–41, 2023

  4. Bohr A, Memarzadeh K: The rise of artificial intelligence in healthcare applications. Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare:25 - 60, 2020

  5. Darzidehkalani E, Ghasemi-Rad M, van Ooijen PMA: Federated Learning in Medical Imaging: Part II: Methods, Challenges, and Considerations. J Am Coll Radiol 19:975–982, 2022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Darzidehkalani E, Ghasemi-Rad M, van Ooijen PMA: Federated Learning in Medical Imaging: Part I: Toward Multicentral Health Care Ecosystems. J Am Coll Radiol 19:969–974, 2022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rieke N, et al.: The future of digital health with federated learning. NPJ Digit Med 3:119, 2020

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Sheller MJ, et al.: Federated learning in medicine: facilitating multi-institutional collaborations without sharing patient data. Sci Rep 10:12598, 2020

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Kairouz P, et al.: Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning 14:1–210, 2021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lutnick B, et al.: A tool for federated training of segmentation models on whole slide images. J Pathol Inform 13:100101, 2022

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Adnan M, Kalra S, Cresswell JC, Taylor GW, Tizhoosh HR: Federated learning and differential privacy for medical image analysis. Sci Rep 12:1953, 2022

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Carbonneau MA, Cheplygina V, Granger E, Gagnon G: Multiple instance learning: A survey of problem characteristics and applications. Pattern Recognition 77:329–353, 2018

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ogier du Terrail J, et al.: Federated learning for predicting histological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer. Nat Med 29:135–146, 2023

  14. Cetinkaya A, Akin M, Sagiroglu, S: Improving Performance of Federated Learning based Medical Image Analysis in Non-IID Settings using Image Augmentation. 2021 International Conference on Information Security and Cryptology (ISCTURKEY):69–74, 2021

  15. Hsu T-MH, Qi, Brown M: Measuring the Effects of Non-Identical Data Distribution for Federated Visual Classification. ArXiv abs/1909.06335, 2019

  16. Farmer ER, Gonin R, Hanna MP: Discordance in the histopathologic diagnosis of melanoma and melanocytic nevi between expert pathologists. Human Pathology 27:528–531, 1996

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lodha S, Saggar S, Celebi JT, Silvers DN: Discordance in the histopathologic diagnosis of difficult melanocytic neoplasms in the clinical setting. J Cutan Pathol 35:349–352, 2008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vahadane A, et al.: Structure-preserving color normalization and sparse stain separation for histological images. IEEE transactions on medical imaging 35:1962–1971, 2016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T: U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation. ArXiv abs/1505.04597, 2015

  20. Wang Y, Shi Q, Chang T-H: Why Batch Normalization Damage Federated Learning on Non-IID Data? IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems PP, 2023

  21. Wu Y, He K: Group Normalization. International Journal of Computer Vision 128:742 – 755, 2018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kingma DP, Ba J: Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. CoRR abs/1412.6980, 2014

  23. McMahan HB, Moore E, Ramage D, Hampson S, Arcas BAy: Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data. Proc. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics: City

  24. Reddi SJ, et al.: Adaptive Federated Optimization. ArXiv abs/2003.00295, 2020

Download references

Acknowledgements

We extend our heartfelt gratitude to the members of the biomedical engineering lab for their invaluable guidance and significant contributions to the development of the federated model.

Funding

This work was supported by the Gachon University research fund of 2022 (GCU-2022–202209640001) and National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (2021R1A2B5B02001915).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Jisup Kim and Kwang Gi Kim contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Jong-Chan Yeom, Jae-Hoon Kim and Jisup Kim. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Jong-Chan Yeom and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jisup Kim or Kwang Gi Kim.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

This study received approval from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Gachon University Gil Medical Center (GBIRB2022-236). Informed consent was waived given the retrospective study design, which presented minimal risk to participants.

Consent to Participate

The study used data devoid of personally identifiable information, and informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) due to minimal risk posed to participants.

Consent to Publish

The study used data devoid of personally identifiable information, and informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) due to minimal risk posed to participants.

Competing Interests

The authors declare competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yeom, J., Kim, J., Kim, Y.J. et al. A Comparative Study of Performance Between Federated Learning and Centralized Learning Using Pathological Image of Endometrial Cancer. J Digit Imaging. Inform. med. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-024-01020-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-024-01020-1

Keywords

Navigation